A Report On Animal Testing

This is an annotated bibliography of animal testing and if it’s morally justified. There are many opinions on the results and the entire process that it takes to test a cosmetic product or a medicine on an animal. There are many alternatives and benefits to animal testing but is it really justified? Or are animals in potential danger.

Nancy Day talks about the two unique perspectives of the generally discussed subject of creature testing and altogether discusses the results of creature testing and experimentation and furthermore the advantages we pick up and expand upon. Staying nonpartisan, she gives the pursuer a decent opportunity to see where both sides are originating from additionally giving many motivations to reject the other so that no inclination is affecting the pursuer’s sentiment. Implied for any one, mindful of this level headed discussion or not, she clears the reality this issue has been overstated and is undoubtedly influencing our day by day lives regular. This book has a fundamental motivation behind giving the pursuer some data about what is going on with the goal that they can choose for themselves which side in this warmed debate to take. This two sided pugnacious source gives an alternate bend and draws in the pursuer to an unceasing fight while alternate sources are exceptionally uneven and straightforwardly tending to the solid contradiction toward creature testing. Before perusing this book I would quickly blame the creature experimenters for such superfluous savagery and abuse yet after some exhaustive exploring, I found that there are a few advantages for creature

Around the world, millions of scientists conduct their studies by testing their research on animals. Many people believe that experimenting on animals is crucial to the advancement of medical discoveries. Studies show however, that animal experimentation is brutal and unnecessary. There are alternatives though: “replacement, reduction, and refinement” (Howard 2).

understand benefits of animal use and know that whether a person wants it or not animal

Animal testing is a cruel way to try and develop new products. There are several other and much safer options that will get better results and potentially save up to two million animals every single year. The Animal Welfare Act is in place but only minimally protects certain animals and leaves many others, up to 95%, vulnerable to atrocious fates. The animals not protected by this act (mostly small or considered house pets) are most widely used and not related closely to humans. There are several alternative methods but they are being neglected since they are new and not being enforced because of it. A few countries and states have banned certain aspect of animal testing but others are encouraging this cruelty.

There are so many products being tested on animals , from being lipsticks, shampoos, makeup, skin care etc. But have you ever wondered the side effects these animals experience while using these products? They will experience Burning, torturing, pain, hunger, thirst etc. How is living in a cage living? It's not it is just surviving.

Ever since the beginning of human history, to the reign of the Mongols, and even to the colonization of the Americas, disease has played a role in shaping society. Its negative impacts has depopulated many cities, countries, and empires. In the distant past, it was quite difficult to avoid contagious diseases. However, in today’s society, steps have been taken to discover new effective modes of treatment through animal testing. Such testing; however, has proved to be quite a controversial issue due to ethics and its utilization of animals. Despite any objections, the use of genetically bred animals is imperative for the purpose of discovering new medications to treat various terminal diseases.

Imagine being poked and prodded with a needle, all to test for a new drug against

Aziz, T., & Stein, J. (2011). Animal testing: TV or not TV? Two views on whether scientists

Discuss the strategic decisions that firms in this sector may be facing. What future strategies can firms pursue to try to secure their competitive advantage and long term survival?

A.1 sought to introduce and launch a new poultry marinade item, and was planning to continue an aggressive marketing campaign against its competitors. However, marketing the new poultry product was a failure and A.1 had to reassess its strategies regarding the launching of new trial marinade brands. The major challenge that A.1 based however was protecting its market share, and brand integrity by counteracting though bold launch of a new steak sauce product by Lawry which was cheaper, and very similar to the A.1 product. Lawry Steak Sauce was one dollar less than A.1. Steak Sauce ($3.99 vs. $4.99), and the Lawry product were 11 ounces whereas A.1 was 10 ounces. Lawry’s product was also similar in taste, texture and packaging as the A.1 product which also presented a serious problem for A.1. Added to this was the fact that Lawry introduced its new product live on an interactive cooking show which gave the product an extra media boost. (Kerin & Peterson, 2011, 634)

Many of us are unaware of the sheer number of animals that undergo constant suffering in the name of human vanity. Animal testing was originally introduced in the early 20th century and is still prominent today. It is morally unacceptable to experiment on animals for human purposes. The procedures used in animal testing are cruel and inhumane, nor are they the most reliable source of data; resulting in many mishaps. Moreover, with the perpetual advancements in technology, there are several alternative methods making animal testing unnecessary. If testing cosmetics and drugs on humans is unacceptable, what makes it acceptable to test on animals?

Mr. Clean, Ivory, OFF, Herbal Essences, BIC, really? These are some of the products used to test on animals, but for what reason. By using these products, you are a suspect to animal testing/ cruelty. Animals should have as much rights as humans, because no animal should have to go through so much pain for what reason, does society really need new cleaning products and chemically made soap? But what society needs to know behind closed doors is that there are about 115 million animals that suffer and are killed each year. Also, animals endure chemicals being dripped into their eyes, injected into their bodies, forced up their nostrils or forced down their throats. (With no pain killers during the process). They are addicted to drugs, forced

Stated by Mahatma Gandhi, “The greatness of the nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated”. Medical research on animals is an effective way for scientist to test different medical discoveries and experiment before using them on humans to check their result. This technique has been used for centuries dating back to people such and Aristotle and Erasistratus. What exactly is medical research on animals? When we take a deeper look into the experiment that are preformed we can conclude that animals are a living model of humans in these laboratories. It is a necessity to harm and test animals with new drugs in order to market them in the medical industry to aid human illnesses. In order to better comprehend and regulate drugs one must understand what medical research on animals is described as and its benefits to pharmaceutical companies for humans. Exposure to the trials and tribulations that animal testing reveals how important it is for scientists to understand the negative effects they contribute to an animal’s welfare and life. In contrary animal testing has been used to save many human lives from consuming or using a drug that could have caused them life threatening illnesses.

(4) Absent any resource constraints, which of the four departmental directions do you think is the most viable? Which is the second best strategy? Which is the least viable? In my humble opinion the most viable option would be to follow Eric Stanger’s advice to go ‘back to basics’. In order to underwrite the new line of LR trademark and experiment with more new products, they had in effect been milking the OM lines. Their price increase on several of our more critical items had outpaced those of their key competitors, in order to always deliver more bottom line profits. They had shaved their A&P budgets for the same purpose and this was resulting in slippage in value and trust among our consumer franchise thus the declining sales and share. They thus needed to cut on