A Research On Employee Engagement

One of the primary factors in employee engagement is a person’s relationship with his or her direct manager. Some managers are excellent at managing teams and making each person feel valued, while others don’t have the same abilities. Train your managers in the skills that can improve employee engagement, and it can boost your organization’s overall results. Most employees fear their supervisors, so they choose to leave because they don’t want to work in a stressful environment. However, they don’t always express their

Employee Engagement: It’s a known perception that an engaged workforce provides many intangible benefits that is linked directly to retention. HR policies should focus on employee engagement initiatives that stimulate motivation levels of employees to perform better and bond with organisation. This process should be initiated right from induction and continue throughout their tenure by opening channels of continuous communication and encouraging interpersonal relations. HR is responsible to incorporate methods to measure engagement and at regular intervals track engagement contribution to company’s success.

In other nations meeting the altruistic and simple human needs of being part of something greater than yourself are the driving forces to an engaging environment (Vorhauser-Smith, 2013). According to Major Angelo’s actions of communicating with employees and developing a relationship with them demonstrate how leaders begin to create an engaging environment. According to Harter & Adkins (2015), employees whose manager communicate with them through meetings are practically three times more likely to be engaged as employees whose managers do not hold regular meetings with them. Another method to engage employees is by ensuring they understand their goals and helping them understand the big picture of how their role impacts the whole organization structure.

It’s important to understand that every experience and interaction at work has the potential to influence an employee’s engagement level. Each person is unique, and to influence their commitment requires an understanding of what motivates them. The most important thing any leader can do to improve engagement is focus on the employee’s individual spirit as well as the team’s and to ensure that they are in complete

An engaged employee will more likely be a greater asset to their employer as the emotional connection will drive them to strive for greater effectiveness.

Maintaining and improving employee engagement are increasingly complex for company’s operations these days due to the instable environment and varied economic conditions (Aon Hewitt, 2012). However, if a company has a good performance in employee engagement, it would surely enjoy competitive advantage and better business outcomes than other companies.

Companies that have higher levels of engaged employees have higher earnings per share (EPS) than companies that have lower engagement levels (Kelleher, 2011). Engaged employees are more productive, have higher levels of customer loyalty and help their employers become more profitable. An engaged employee is less likely to leave their current position. This saves their company money because there is no need to spend money to hire and train new personal. These saving can be passed along to the employees for increased wages, bonuses, and benefits. All of these items help in motivating employees, to attempt to engage the disengaged.

Employee engagement is a business management concept. An "engaged employee" is one who is fully involved in, and enthusiastic about their work, and therefore will act in a way that furthers their organisations interests. Employee Engagement is a measurable degree of an employee's positive or negative emotional attachment to their job, colleagues and organisation which profoundly influences their willingness to learn and perform at work. A well and engaged employee is efficient and effective and a valuable asset in the workplace.

An organization’s performance and success is closely related to that organization’s ability to effectively manage employee engagement, and several advantages of engaged employees include profitability, more motivated employees and higher levels of performance, and an increase in employees’ trust in the organization (Hough, Green & Plumlee, 2015). One important aspect to include when discussing benefits with employee engagement is overall workplace satisfaction. Engaged employees not only create value, but in turn also feel valued in the workplace. This value is accompanied by a meaningful job which provides the employees with a sense of satisfaction. The more a person’s work environment fulfills his or her needs, values or personal characteristics, the greater the degree of job satisfaction (Abraham, 2012).

Employee engagement is the buzzword in any organization. Several articles and studies have highlighted on how to measure and manage engagement. This is an essential area in an organization to draw on because it translates into an organizational success. However, engagement is two-way process: organizations must bring about a design to engage the employee, who in turn has a choice about the level of engagement to offer the employer. Each reinforces the other. An engaged employee comes across a mix of job contentment, organizational commitment, job connection and feelings of empowerment. It is where the concept of synergy comes in, where a creation of a whole is greater than the sum of its parts.

This course emphasized the concept of employee engagement in the workplace. Employee engagement is critical for many reasons, it is necessary to understand and help organizations lower employee turnover, increase revenue, and help managers communicate more efficiently. There are differences between employees who are actively engaged and disengaged in the workplace. Within active engagement, it is more likely that an employee is confident, valued, and inspired within the organization. They understand their personal worth in the group. The quote by Maya Angelou resonated with me, “People will forget what you said, what you did, but they will never forget how you made them feel”. This quote speaks true to all aspects of life, not just in the workplace. When we treat people with their God-given significance, it can motivate them to work and live better. Employees who are

Employee engagement is the emotional commitment an employee shows for the organization and its goals (Kruse 2012). It can also be defined as the act of an employee being involved in, enthusiastic about and satisfied with his or her work (Seijts et al.., 2006). An engaged employee is one who actually cares and is passionate about his job and company goals. He or she does not work just to get a paycheck rather they work to ensure the organization’s goals are met.

Employee engagement is a fairly new concept (Macey & Schneider, 2008), yet it has received extensive attention in the past decade, leading Schaufeli & Salanova (2007) to contend that engagement is indispensable for modern organisations given the multitude of challenges they face in such a dynamic business environment. Moreover, it leads Macey et al. (2009) to contend that organisations that harness engagement can even gain a competitive advantage. For example, research by Macey et al. (2009) showed “that among a sample of 65 firms in different industries, the top 25% on an engagement index had a greater return on assets (ROA), profitability, and more than double the shareholder value compared to the bottom 25%” (Gruman & Saks, 2011). Furthermore, Gruman & Saks (2011) note that numerous studies highlight the role employee engagement plays in driving “individual attitudes, behaviour and performance as well as organisational performance, productivity, retention, financial performance, and even shareholder return”. Therefore, as captured by Kaye & Jordan-Evans (2003), “the challenge today is not just retaining talented people, but fully engaging them, capturing their minds and hearts at each stage of their work lives”.

If you are a supervisor in small organizations, encourage a team of empowered, devoted employees should be on top of your priorities. There is nothing more essential to the organization’s operation than having committed and engaged manpower. As studies by many researches and practical investigations, employee engagement is the key driver for efficiency, development, competitive advantages and labor retention. The actions of immediate supervisor crucially affect their subordinate’s engagement. A supervisor who fails to engage employees by providing their support and creating a good working relationship environment can lead to talent attrition. The cost of the effort, timing and resource for hiring new replacement and training new

Engaging employees and keeping them motivated in their job is important for an organization. Engaged and disengaged employees perform differently from each other. Shuck and Wollard (2013) stated that engaged employees are 18% more productive, 12% more profitable, 12% better at engaging customers, 62% less likely to be involved in a workplace accident, and 27% less prone to absenteeism (as cited in Fleming & Asplund, 2007, p. 169). Additionally, engaged employees are 87% less likely to leave an organization than disengaged employees (Corporate Leadership Council, 2004). Supervisors can play a role in helping employees feel more engaged; therefore leading to less turnover and more productive employees within the organization. There are many theories that have been produced about employee engagement and motivation. Frederick Herzberg produced a theory in 1968 called Motivation – Hygiene Theory. This theory, along with a few others, marked a change in how employee motivation was viewed. This theory will be examined and discussed in terms of social service employees’ engagement and what role supervision plays.