A Research On Individuals Born Between 1980 And 2000

Social networking is the mainstream way to communicate with anyone. Teenagers are obsessed with social networking, no one calls each other unless it’s extreme circumstances or their mother. Sharing pictures, sharing life stories, and sharing opinions online has been the way of life and the norm for kids growing up with computers and smart phones. The parents to this generation have not grown up in the same environment and have different standards for online activity. In the Article “ 10 Reasons Why I Avoid Social Networking Services” written by Alan Norton, he lists why he does not use social networking services. His personal beliefs are backed up with statistics and hold true to many people in his generation but not in the younger ones.

Social networking is quickly becoming more and more popular. I am going to investigate exactly how and why it influences people lives. I'm going to specifically look at different age groups and see if there is any pattern in their lifestyle. I will find my information from books, articles, news stories, the internet and people’s experiences and opinions. I will interview a whole range of people so I can get more of a range of opinions from teenagers to OAP’s to see if there is a general feeling for different age groups. My essay will address many questions such as are people’s opinions affected by their age? Does it influence people’s lives in different ways because of their age?

The data collection method and form include self-administered surveys given through the Internet, thereby eliminating potential interviewer bias and interpretive error. Furthermore, self-administered surveys assure the respondent’s anonymity and invoke more honesty in the responses. The surveys will consist of questions concerning media habits of the respondents: whether or not they have social media accounts, how often they check they check social media on a daily basis, and which social media platform they use the most. Questions will also probe the amount of time spent using social media, the approximate length of each session in which they check social media, the types of media they use to remain abreast of current events, and the media platforms they rely on most to provide them with the news. Questions concerning their perceptions of trust in the media they use will also be included in the self-administered surveys.

Through just one click of a button on Facebook, I was able to launch my research survey to my personal network of hundreds of people. This online snowballing approach broadened the pool of participants into a more diverse group of people

This technology tools allows adults to keep in touch with technology, society, and learning, actually based on research from Pew Research Center (n.d) by examine a survey in November 2010 several elements were identified like the increase in social network sites are been used in order to elevated the numbers of social interaction, and the average user of social media is half likely to be in isolation from society that the average person living in North America.

The rapid growth of technology in our society has become more dominant than it was in the 17th and 18th century. Today, technology is used for almost everything in our day to day lives. But the most common usage of technology is for communication and industrialization. However, every good thing has its disadvantage if it is over used, and since technology has become very dominant, it is used by both young and older people but more predominant among the youth of the today. Even more, technology has brought about social networking such as Facebook, Twitter, my space, piazza.com, instagram, tango, and last but not the least texting. According to socialnetworking.procon.org, “47% of American adults used social networking sites like

This resource is a four-year overview of trends with Millennials. It also tracks the changes in methodology of their research. Their findings summarized as Millennials prefer to help people not institutions, they are strongly influenced by their peers and have frequent interaction with them, they treat their time, money, and skills with equal value, and they use media and technology to build their informal networks.

Most of us probably have siblings, and the majority of us can get quite frustrated with them. Surely you can relate to the situation when your sibling accuses you of doing something, even when they were the ones at fault? If you do, have you ever thought about why your younger sibling has it easier than you? Most of the time they don’t have to deal with the consequences, and they are favoured and get more attention. Also, their personality is different due to their order of birth. Birth order could shape their personality, or simply how they got treated throughout their childhood. Besides, when your younger sibling gets away with everything, the blame falls on you.

Edison Reasearch and The Arbitron Incorporation administered a survey in 2013 to provide statistics on behaviors and attitudes of people who access digital platforms. Their findings shed light on the use of social media networks and smartphones, which influence the quality of communication in society. This study found that six in ten Americans have a social profile on a SNS and that 71 million Americans show habitual use of social media. A thirty-eight percent increase in a five-year span of those who have a SNS, and a twenty-two percent increase of habitual users. The greatest growth rate is seen in people 55 and older, which is not surprising. People of this age group typically experience cultural lag, meaning it takes a bit more time

Rat: A person born in the year of Rat is ambitious, honest, sincere, generous, and able to maintain self-control. Good jobs for people born in the year of the rat are adventurer, scientist, poet, or politician.

2) Approximately 80% of adults in the United States use a social network on a daily basis.

Nevertheless, the Internet opens new ways to investigate in social and behavioural sciences because there are many scientific questions about some target population that do not look for generalised results but representative ones. As many scholars recognise, the Internet provides new opportunities for non-random survey data (Couper, 2000; Fricker and Schonlau, 2002). In particular, these authors distinguish the advantages of the Internet to capture the “hard to reach”/“hard to involve” population. In fact, this paper proposes to analyze if social networking sites (SNSs), specifically the Facebook network site, can help researchers to contact hidden or hard to reach persons. Although in the last decade researchers became interested in the study of SNSs, they particularly focus on the characteristics of the users of SNSs (Back et al., 2010), on the analysis of the social capital and their influence in users behaviour (Ellison et al., 2007; Bigge, 2006) or on ethical issues concerning with the reward of private information on the Internet (Acquisti and Gross, 2006; Boyd and Ellison, 2008; Boyd, 2008; Boyd and Hargittai, 2010). But until now it has not been common to exploit SNSs as a research tool (Brickman-Bhutta, 2009). Boyd and Ellison (2008, p. 1) define SNSs as “web-based services that allow individuals to construct a public or semi-public

* What makes social network sites unique is not that they allow individuals to meet strangers, but rather that they enable users to articulate and make visible their social networks. This can result in connections between individuals that would not otherwise be made, but that is often not the goal, and these meetings are frequently between "latent ties" (Haythornthwaite, 2005) who share some offline connection. On many of the large SNSs, participants are not necessarily "networking" or looking to meet new people; instead, they are primarily communicating with people who are already a part of their extended social network. To emphasize this articulated social network as a critical organizing feature of these sites, we label them "social network sites."

The use of SNSs (social network sites) can have both positive and negative effects on the individual; however, few studies identify the types of people who frequent these Internet sites

The method of the survey was to gather data connecting the parallels between how different generations incorporate social media into their lives and whether or not they have an effect on the individuals physical and social environment. In order to gather data, to prove that there is a correlation between how social media does have an effect on an individual’s physical and social environment, an anonymous survey was constructed and distributed to focus on the idea of how different generational groups interact with social media. The survey was titled “How Often Do You Use Social Media”, and was structured with questions that targeted individuals that were familiar with using social networks.