A Research Paper On Women's Suffrage

It is only recently, all things considered, that women are playing larger roles in the United States political system. However, there is still a large gap in gender representation between men and women. Some women, like politician Wendy Davis, are working diligently to close this gap and represent issues important to women. Despite the progress that is slowly being made, there are still large issues that face women in politics today, and under the scrutiny of the public eye it can be difficult for women to prove their readiness for leadership roles (though this should not be the case). In this paper I will be analyzing Wendy Davis' campaign for

enhance female voters’ identification with the political system – and in turn, their sense of being able to influence the decision-making process, making their participation worthwhile. These effects, however, are not confined only to women: the presence of women in a wide range of political offices can increase the confidence that male citizens have in the political system as well. Consequently, electing greater proportions of women to political positions can deepen democracy and encourage civic engagement in the general population.

The proportion of women in leadership roles in the Senate, House of Representatives, and Presidential positions reflect this. The current position of women representation in the U.S. is precarious. In the elections of 2012, the greatest number of female incumbents ever were up for re-election in the Senate. Ten female Democrats, six of them incumbents, were nominated, while one Republican was nominated for Senate and ran for office. Ryan Steinhauer notes that in Congress, both in the Senate and the House of Representatives, women historically and currently lack representation. The results from the 2012 election could greatly affect female representation in the Senate: “If all or most of the incumbent women prevail in 2012, and even just a few women of the many recruited win new seats, women would reach an all-time high in the Senate. But the loss of just one female Senate seat with no replacements would cost women ground in the Senate for the first time since 1978, when the number of women in the Senate went to one from

Why should a woman be President of the United States? Well, the question should really be, “Why Not? Why has a woman not been elected president?” Women are capable to handle the assignments, duties, responsibilities, and obligations that a president must deal with. They have the same functioning body and mind as men, and perhaps a better moral compass. This paper will list some of the reasons why a woman should, one day, become President of the United States. The argument will also be backed by interviews and literature from other authors, and women who have researched and written about this topic.

Though the representation of women in national legislatures has been thoroughly studied, there has been relatively little research dedicated to women’s representation in subnational institutions (as Vengroff, Nyiri, and Fugiero note in “Electoral System and Gender Representation in Sub-National Legislatures”). This is unfortunate, as women have been shown to tend to take on different roles in legislatures than men; for example, women often tend to focus on issues described by one author as “children’s and families’ concerns”. These issues include things like education, welfare and childcare, with far fewer women focusing on things like public works (Palley, Dolan). A better understanding of what factors lead to greater representation of women

When examining women in politics there are two different stages to consider: the decision to run for office and getting elected to office. Party leadership, whether state or legislative, can play a significant role in both stages. With regard to the decision to run, party leadership can partake in recruitment—encouraging potential candidates to run— and/or gatekeeping—discouraging potential candidates from running (Sanbonmatsu, 2006, 28). Additionally, party leadership can provide mentorship throughout the race, and into office if the candidate is elected, access to and help raising resources, and official endorsements among other avenues of support. Through interviews done for her book, Kira Sanbonmatsu finds that “most party leaders believe

As many would say, men still rule when it comes to the world of politics. Female representation is down and fewer women are running for elective office. Due to the decreasing participation and the gender gap in political ambition, we are becoming farther away from aspiring young women to seek and hold office in our future generations. But women’s underrepresentation is likely to continue in office is likely to extend towards the future unless we all start taking a

The cultural and social factors that counter women’s entrance into the political arena are not easily altered. It is would be abnormal for a country’s culture to revolutionize at the drop of a hat, biases and beliefs are deep-seated in society and they take time to weed out and transform.

As a matter of fact, how can men solve a problem that doesn’t affect them. According to Valerie Hoekstra a Professor in the Political Science department at Arizona State University, ‘’ In Western Europe and other democracies, women represent only a small percentage of the members of high courts’’(ProQuest). There can be plenty of solutions to solve the dehumanization of women, but they will not become effective when men are the ones deciding if the proposition should become effective or not. Unfortunately, there is a low participation of women in Government, and that has stopped almost every solution to end the inequality of women and men.

Even though women have increased their interest in politics, their involvement remains slow-moving almost at a standstill. Participation of women in US government is only a mere 18 percent. There are several factors that have impacted the female participation in the politics. These factors include their responsibility for childcare, their disbelief that they qualify for the position, and they lack confidence in their ability to perform the duties of the position.

Women politicians will be a role model to many females in society, encouraging them to believe in themselves, and defy stereotypes that suggest that women do not possess the same skills as men to be a federal government candidate. Furthermore, if there are more women in positions of power in the government they can introduce programs training programs, quotas, affirmative action measures, and special financial support for female candidates (Trembley, Pelletier,2001) This quote suggests that these programs that will introduced for women have alleviate women from their current situations in terms of education, employment and opportunity. These programs can raise awareness amongst women, provide them with the education they require in order to represent their cultural groups or issues in the government. Furthermore, it has also been revealed that women have less financial support in comparison to men for their campaigns (Trembley, Pelletier,2001). In order to eradicate this disparity between the funding between men and women, these programs that provide them financial support that will empower women, and provide them with equal tools in to win roles of leadership, and eventually win the election. Furthermore, young women will be given additional education on how they can enter the political sphere and overcome the barrier that pose as a challenge to their ambitions. Therefore, there will be an increase in the number of women seeking candidacy in federal politics, and an increase in female representation in the government. This is the shift that we aim to see in the future, allowing the government to serve the needs of the

Abstract This essay looks into the reasons why societies have prevented women from making a fair and equal representation in parliament and what has held the females back from doing so. Firstly it looks into the two major aspects of personal problems, which are internal conflicts and being confined to family duties. Secondly, this essay explores what type of stereotypes are there and how they discourage women from entering into politics. Thirdly this essay discusses how gender inequality stops females from pursuing into politics.

Third, parties employee the notion of “gender appropriateness” both in vertical and horizontal distribution of political responsibilities. Both direction of the power distribution are dominated by men. When women exclusively focus on women issues within the parties they do not receive much recognition and feel powerless as opposed to men whose scope of dealing with issues seem diverse. This same practice is pervasive in parliamentary settings too.

New Zealand was the first country to give women the right to vote in 1893, however, since then we have dropped to 27th when it comes to gender representation in government, out of 188 countries. One of the many reasons as to why women are under represented in parliament can be linked to the issue of the political obstacles that face women. This is when they want to be in parliament, women whom are in parliament, and the many women who this is not an option for due to lack of opportunity. Women have to face this “masculine model” of politics and government. Men are dominant in parliament, meaning that political life revolves around male norms and values (Shvedova). This can be extended, politics is very much about competition and confrontation. Rather than politics being

Another measurement of women in governmental issues developed as of late everywhere throughout the world. An ever increasing number of females have now been going into politics. Ordinary governmental issues reflected male concerns and henceforth women were eminently truant in legislative issues.