A Research Study On Ownership Structure Affects Management Board Diversity

1923 Words8 Pages
CRITICAL APPRIASAL OF QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH 1. Full title - Author(s)- A Quantitative Case Study of How Ownership structure affects management board diversity in Germany. 2. Name – Jane Oehmichen, Marc Steffen and Michael Wolff. 3. Date or Year – 2012 4. Journal or Conference Name – ZFB SPECIAL ISSUE 2/2012 5. Publication Place –Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft March 2012, Volume 82, Supplement 2, pp 95–125 ZFB. 6. Web Link- http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11573-011-0541-0 WHAT WAS THE MAIN HYPOTHESIS? The hypothesis was whether a higher ownership concentration of a company is associated with a higher probability of having at least one woman on the management board. The author’s basic assumption of…show more content…
WHAT WERE THE MEASURES USED? The authors utilized both clear and inferential insights to examine the data. It is likewise proper to the companion plan as this configuration additionally means to quantify contrasts between the two groups, as far as result variables. A logit regression and propensity score matching score coordinating was utilized in order to challenge the strength of the method. The authors used control group for the companies with women on their management boards on the control model, and calculated the t-values for the important variables using the closest neighbourhood approach. The outcomes can in this way be considered as strong with respect to the decision of strategy. Logit regressions of the ownership structure, board characteristics and company controls on the dummy variable indicating if there is a woman among the management board members. All variables used are described in the appendix. The sample is described. The authors report used Huber/White (QML) robust z-values in parentheses. ETHICAL ISSUES The authors stated that, the purpose behind the research designed which utilized just publically accessible information starting from databases, for example, DataStream and yearly reports, and did not specified when authorization was sort from the companies involved in the research. This raised a moral issue as the authors utilized these as model to describe the
Open Document