preview

A Rhetorical Analysis Of BOW DOWN, Macklemore

Decent Essays

Rhetorical Analysis of “BOW DOWN, MACKLEMORE: Why Same Love is NOT My Queer Anthem”

In the article, “BOW DOWN, MACKLEMORE: Why Same Love is NOT My Queer Anthem,” Kelly Fox argues that Macklemore’s song Same Love is homophobic, racist, and that Macklemore is a poor excuse for an LGBT ally. While Fox may have a few good points, she rants throughout her article, and establishes almost no credibility with her audience. All of this makes finding those good bits really difficult and not worth it.
Kelly Fox presents as incredibly emotional about the subject, and her article comes off as more of a rant than the rhetoric she intended it to be. With a title like, “BOW DOWN, MACKLEMORE,” in all caps, and with her closing statement of, “I don’t need …show more content…

She quotes Macklemore’s song Same Love, “‘If I was gay, I would think hip hop hates me.’ Macklemore denounces hip hop as categorically homophobic. [...] Hip hop is no more homophobic than pop, country, rock, or any other musical genre.” This may or may not be true, but simply stating it and expecting her audience to take her word for it is completely irrational. Fox goes on to say that allowing hip hop to be thought of as more homophobic than any other musical genre “reinforces the racist myth that people of color are more homophobic than white people,” because hip hop is a genre “created by and for people of color.” Many people, myself included, have never heard of this idea of black homophobia. Fox offers no outside source to back up her radical statement. Another example Fox’s terrible inability to offer any information other than her own personal opinions to her audience is where she states that “trans* women of color are dying on the streets daily, and queer people are disproportionately subjected to incarceration, homeless[ness], rape, and murder…” This is very likely true, however, it’s not exactly common knowledge. While it’s definitely not absolutely necessary to cite any sort of study here, doing so would have acknowledged a broader audience and strengthened her

Get Access