A Rhetorical Analysis Of Donald Trump's Allegations

Another thing that Trump has done to affect us that live in the valley or in Texas, Donald Trump said that he would renegotiate or break the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). "We will either renegotiate it or we will break it," Trump said during an interview on 60 Minutes, following a question about how to keep American jobs from moving to Mexico. "Because, you know, every agreement has an end." NAFTA, which has been in effect since the mid-1990s, allows free trade between the United States, Canada and Mexico." “We need fair trade. Not free trade,” he said. "It’s got to be fair." Trump is not the only GOP candidate to suggest that the U.S. can and should break its international agreements in some circumstances. Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee and former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina all have said they would renege on the Iran nuclear deal the Obama Administration struck earlier this year. This has a major effect on us because if the NAFTA brakes the agreement that has been since the 1990’s it would stop everyone that comes to here for a better job and just stay in Mexico with that the population would decrease and much more will happen.

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is an international agreement between Canada, America and Mexico. This agreement took effect in January 1994 and was signed by President Bill Clinton. This agreement brought great changes in trade volumes and open new opportunities for millions of labours. Later, in January 2008 according to the schedule all duties and restrictions were eliminated. About 45,000 tariffs were eliminated in 1994 and only 3000 were left until 1999.

After 27 months of negotiation, the North Atlantic Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), a trade agreement between the three north American countries: Canada, United States, and Mexico, was put into effect on January 1st 1994. NAFTA was developed to increase trade among the three north American countries while simultaneously promoting each countries’ economy growth. However, the United States faces a new government, and President Trump believes that NAFTA should be renegotiated to modernize the trade agreement instead of removing U.S participation. Some of these renegotiations, include: Trade in goods, Investment, Digital Trade, Cross-Border Data Flows, Government Procedure, etc, take into account the changes in the economy since 1994. This new

There are even more people engrossed in Trump's campaign as his contentious rhetoric is spreading and becoming exponentially obscene. His words foreshadow what he'd do if he were president. My teachers have said that they "don't care" if Trump becomes president because "he wouldn't have any power, thanks to Congress." Obviously, that's false, and as we all have seen, his divisive words have been significantly detrimental to unification in this country - and he's not even in charge. I can imagine how he'd undermine the liberties granted by this country from the start. As he gains more advocates for becoming President of the U.S.A, I'm sure everyone else will be even more surprised by what he has to say because he'll have more leeway for his

The article entitled “The Tide That Sinks All Boats” by Chris Matthews discusses how feelings of protectionism and nationalism are making it difficult for President Obama to pass the Trans-pacific partnership (TPP) through Congress. The implication in this article is that the campaigns of Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump during this presidential election stirred these feelings amongst Americans. Thus, members of Congress fear that passing the free trade agreement will make them a “traitor to the American Worker”. The article also mentions how free trade agreements often take the brunt of people’s fears regarding global trade and its impact on domestic job security referencing NAFTA (Matthews, 2016).

In Is Steve Bannon really as bad as all that? , from the nature of the topic, the audience can already be narrowed down to those who enjoy political news and events. This can already be picked out from the introductory sentence stating “If you’ve never heard of Stephen K. Bannon…” Non-followers of politics would not recognize that Bannon is President-elect Donald Trump’s chief White House strategist and senior counselor, as the mainstream media news is usually only filled with the unsightly and controversial side of Trump, like with his locker room talks and “plans to build a wall”. Someone who actually is concerned with the policies and administration of the new President-elect would know of Bannon’s appointment. Furthermore, Parker is addressing

Three years after the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) created the largest free trade area in the world, the debate rages on.

With the United States under Trump, there has been renegotiating of NAFTA, an agreement that allows free trade between the United States, Canada, and Mexico. In the opinion article, “NAFTA talks should stick to helping consumers and taxpayers, not pet clauses,” economist, Mark Milke, attempts to persuade his audience to share his views on changing NAFTA and its free trade policies, as well as to explain what he believes should be considered when redrafting these policies. Milke comments on the three principles that he believes are most important when redrafting NAFTA using quantitative and statistical data, as well as his personal observations on situations to support his thesis that free trade should remain

The North American Free Trade Agreement, commonly known as the NAFTA, is a trade agreement between the United States, Canada and Mexico launched to enable North America to become more competitive in the global marketplace (Amadeo, 2011). The NAFTA is regarded as “one of the most successful trade agreements in history” for its impact on increases in agricultural trade and investment among the three contracting nations (North American Free Trade Agreement, 2011). Supporters and opponents of the NAFTA have argued the effects of the agreement on participating nations since its inception; yet, close examination proves that NAFTA has had a relatively positive impact on the economies of the United States, Canada, and Mexico.

First, he wants to “appoint the toughest and smallest trade negotiators to fight on behalf of American workers.(Fernandez 1). Mr. Trump wants to understand and see where the American workers’ jobs are going. Furthermore, he wants to note why millions of Americans don’t have jobs and who are taking them away. To do that he has to first renegotiate NAFTA or get rid of it (Fernandez 2).What is NAFTA and what mess it is creating? Basically, a trade agreement between the USA, Mexico and Canada formed by Bill Clinton, and it has let many Americans without jobs because most of them have gone to Mexico. That is the main reason Donald J. Trump hates this agreement and how it has destroyed the United States economy to bits and pieces. Additionally, what makes Trump fierce is that China has been stealing American trade secrets for many years. He clearly stated, “If China does not stop its illegal activities, including its theft of American trade secrets, I will use every lawful presidential power to remedy trade disputes, including the application of tariffs consistent with Section 201 and 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 and Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962” (Fernandez 3). Clearly, this shows that Trump is serious about his job and doesn’t care if he is dealing with China. China has been stealing all our trade secrets and Barack Obama didn’t do anything about it. In brief, this clearly shows that our future President has the characteristics and personality of a true leader that is ready for this great battle.

The first topic that these candidates have spilled their views on would be how they would take on the trade system. Candidate Donald Trump’s views on the trade system are depicted in a seven-point plan. One, he would take the U.S. out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership; two, he is going to get trade experts to fight for the American workers; three, assign the secretary of commerce to uncover all issues with current trade agreements in efforts to protect the American workers; four, reestablish and negotiate terms with NAFTA; five, state that China’s currency is a manipulator; six, take action on trade cases against the Chinese and enforce the WTO; and seven, put an end to illegal activity that China partakes in and enforce action. (Hains, 2016) Trump makes it clear that if an agreement is not reached that the Unites States will walk from

The development, successes, and failures of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) interest me because of the recent media coverage and the issues brought to the forefront as a result of the new presidential administration. While I endeavor to follow the controversy communicated through the major news sources, the countless opinions regarding the effects of the agreement and the potential renegotiation has left me with questions. Hence, I thought it would be a timely and beneficial research project to discern the original intent, expected outcomes, and discussions expounding on successes and failures since it was signed.

What emerged from these back-room dealings was a monumentally flawed agreement. On the issue of job creation, the central focus of pro-NAFTA campaigning, it is fair to measure NAFTA's real-life results against its supporters' expansive promises of hundreds of thousands of new, high paying U.S. jobs. However, even measured against more lenient "do no harm" standard, NAFTA has been a failure. Consider this recent opinion poll of Americans on NAFTA's performance:

In the article, “Trade Agreements Trump Loves To Hate Actually Have Small Positive Effects”, the main idea is that trade is affecting United States in both negative and positive ways, although many just see the negative effects. Both of the presidential candidates oppose NAFTA and TPP, as Donald Trump said, “the worst trade deal maybe ever signed anywhere.” The article shows several graphs describing that NAFTA only contributed 7.5% growth to US economy during the 90s. Although preferential trade agreements have said to have small positive effects on trade between small countries, the negative effects cannot be overlooked. For example, workers temporarily lose their jobs, wages are distributed unevenly, and low skilled workers are in trouble.

In the article “NAFTA at 20: Overviews and Trade Effects” by Villarreal and Fergusson, we are given and account of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Specifically, the article is broken down into four main sections. They are: trade liberalization before the implementation of NAFTA, an overview of NAFTA provisions, trade trends and economic effects, and policy considerations respectively. In each of these sections, the article discusses in detail how what NAFTA is and how it has affected the US, Canadian, and Mexican economies. Therefore, let us briefly examine NAFTA.