A Rhetorical Analysis On Immigration

Recently illegal immigration has become a very pressing issue among people. Many people around the borders are being greatly affected by the issue and think immediate action needs to be taken to put a stop to the issue. The Documentary Border War: Battle Over Illegal Immigration takes a stand on the issue using many examples of pathos, ethos, and logos to try and persuade people that illegal immigration is a very serious issue and we need to put a stop to it. This documentary follows the lives of people who have been affected by illegal immigration, and explains how they feel about the issue. Another way that people can look at the issue of illegal immigration is through the eyes of the immigrants, and the reasons why they might be trying

No doubt, it is a hot button issue, look up any presidential nominee with the term ‘immigration’ after their name and scores of videos, articles, and data will flood your way. The language used when referring to immigration policy, legislation, and migrants themselves determines the scope used in assessing the situation. All of the nominees for the 2016 President Election have taken a stance on immigration, each may be independent from one another, but are common in several key elements. Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, and Ben Carson’s immigration policies reveal a gendered and criminalizing rhetoric, which marginalizes and dehumanizes migrant people.

Donald Trump has voiced his strong opposition to Mexicans being in the United States; he even went as far as proposing the idea of building a wall separating Mexico from the US. According to Forbes’ article written by Dolia Estevez, “he wants to deport 11.3 million undocumented workers, 6 million of which are Mexicans, and strip babies born to undocumented immigrants of their birthright citizenship.”

Immigration has been one of the largest topics of political conversations recently due to the extreme stances taken towards it with the current presidency. President Trump’s entire campaign was based on promises to take harsh measures against illegal immigration, blaming immigrants for many of the nation’s problems. His rhetoric caused many individuals to take action against those who heavily believe in mass deportation. During his presidency, he unfortunately was able to pass policies that allow the Immigration and Customs Enforcement to be extremely strict and harsh on arresting anyone suspected of being an illegal immigrant. These policies further incite the argument concerning the power balance between federal and state governments, otherwise

In the article “Deportation Before Incarceration” by Peter H. Schuck, he proposes an innovative way to help alleviate overcrowding in the United States prison system – the deportation of some immigrants before they enter prison. What makes Schuck’s article effective is his use of the rhetorical device known as organization. By organizing his paper starting with background information of the topic at hand; including several other proposals and examining the faults of each; setting up his point with the laws already established; offering a solution, his proposal, to overcrowding in the prison system; and finally, with a strong conclusion that recaps the entirety of the article, Schuck makes an effective article.

Throughout the article, “The Framing of Immigration,” George Lakoff and Sam Ferguson hold an affirmative tone encouraging the public to view immigration not only politically, but also emotionally. The authors’ claim that today’s current debate on immigration is not fully grasping all the aspects, such as an analyzing immigrant's reasons for fleeing and how they live in America, later affecting it -- these reason must be taken into account to find an efficient solution where all countries must help to end this conflict. To emphasis their main claim they break down immigration, analyzing how they are referred to in a degrading manner, are being treated unfairly by the government in America, and encouraging readers to understand their perspective.

This paper looks at the rhetorical style of three articles regarding immigration. The article have various viewpoints and each looks at different aspects of the immigration. The articles all have in depth analysis on the topic they are covering. I will look at each article by analyzing the way the article is presented. I will try not worry about the topic, but the style of the writing and tone. Each article has characteristics of audience and rhetoric which gives them a sense of credibility.

My Rhetorical analysis, essay was quite challenging because I’ve never composed one before. Learning that a rhetoric analysis essay is the study of how writers and speakers use words to influence an audience was a whole new subject for me. After brainstorming and doing the actual analysis, I was ready to write a thesis. I chose a topic that was I was very intrigued about and honestly wanted to learn more about. Finally, I started to write an introduction, paragraphs, and conclusion.. Starting with an introduction, which lead cleanly into my argument. My argument involved my author’s stance on the Immigration Reform Act, I began by giving factual data and/or the history of the Immigration Reform Act’s that were passed. Each one of my body paragraphs

Since the beginning of diplomacy and government in the U.S immigration/immigration reform has been a highly debated topic. Immigration reform refers to changes to the country's current immigration policies. However, never has this topic ever been so controversial then now, with President Donald Trump’s and his proposed policies and ideas on how the country should go about securing our borders from immigrants he claims are may pose a threat to our nation. On reason this topic is so highly debated is it affects employment, crime, and many other large topics that touch everyone who lives in the country. Ever since Trump formally launched his campaign on June 16, 2015 one of his main topics to speak on are immigration and how he’s going to secure

President Trump's goal is to rid the entire nation of undocumented immigrants(Calabresi et al, 2016). Trump plans to send immigrants back to Mexico to wait out the immigration process(Kulish et al, 2017). However, Mexico did not approve of this plan. Trump is trying to pawn a U.S. problem on another country, and it is causing tensions to rise. Trump also plans to use expedited removal of illegal Mexican immigrants. This means he plans to deport people without a judge as extensively as the law will allow it in order to prevent back log of immigrant cases(Kulish et al, 2017). By preventing illegal Mexican immigrants from obtaining the necessary wages in order for their families to be financially stable, the Mexican economy will only plummet more. These people will continue to live in poverty, and the incentive will be even higher to illegally immigrate to the U.S.. It also creates the problem for the U.S. with a lack of a blue collar workforce population for the service economy and agriculture. He also plans on expanding the program 287(g) which, from 2013-2016, led to over 175,000 deportations(Kullish et al, 2017). The program was able to deport so many people because it used racial profiling. The U.S. has come so far in civil rights and liberties just to stigmatize Mexican Americans as illegal immigrants. The only beneficial thing Trump has done in his immigration policy is leave DACA alone.

There are millions of illegal immigrants in the United States, as Markon (2016) argues that illegal from South and Central America, Europe, and Mexico form the entire illegal immigrants between 10 million to 12 million in the United States. One of these illegal is my father, who came in 1996, he came to the U.S.A to work and searched the possibility to pay the many debts that he got in my country; in addition, my country had a big problem where there weren’t jobs and many banks had broken because the change from Sucre to the dollar. At that time, my father thought the only solution was coming here to get money and pay. Likewise, as my father, there are other undocumented immigrants that came from the same situation or by other reasons to this country. Present day, the actual president of the U.S is Donald Trump, who has been wanted that entirely illegal immigrants are deported to their own country since he made some line of attack against the illegal trough his campaign. Precisely Abdullah and Jaffe (2017) explain that the president Trump signed many executive orders in his first days of being president, one of these

In “The Framing of Immigration,” George Lakoff and Sam Ferguson believe that issue defining framing is narrowing, particularly in the case of immigration reform. Immigration reform, they claim, is a complex issue whose simple frame incorporates and ignores different security, economic, and social concerns. The paper relies on the warrant that undocumented immigrants deserve equal rights, which can be seen sdkjs. The authors insures that their claim is easily understood by the audience though the structure of their paper — which breaks up their argument into different headings, subheadings, and bullet points — and their jargon — which is written to make it easier for an everyday

Our President, Mr. Donald Trump has been going on about why the wall should be built ever since he started running for President. Accordingly, Mr. Trump has recently signed an order for the Mexico border wall to be built. Moreover, he has talked greatly about deporting Illegal criminal immigrants from the U.S. to where they originated from. Deporting these Illegal aliens along with building this wall and our border security, we could keep the illegal aliens out of our country. These things could help the U.S. greatly with many worldwide problems.

Illegal immigration is one of the biggest problems our country faces today. No solution will make everyone happy. Many political candidates are currently expressing their views on illegal immigration. Donald Trumps has a idea of putting a wall across the southern n borders of the U.S up walls to stop illegal immigration. He also proposes to end birthright citizenship and raise penalties for overstaying a visa, etc. Some of Donald Trumps immigration reform may be a bit extreme, but if could also be very effective.

Trumps views on immigration is America should build a wall along the southern border and says that Mexico should help pay for the wall. Donald Trump explains that they make money off our trade deals and the remittances from sending illegal immigrants back to Mexico; and until the help pay for the wall, he wants to raise fees on visas, border crossing cards, etc. He also says that illegal immigrants have cost American taxpayers billions of dollars. According to Donald Trump immigration reform, “U.S. taxpayers have been asked to pick up hundreds of billions in health care costs, housing costs, education costs, welfare costs, etc. The annual cost of free tax credits alone paid to illegal immigrants quadrupled to $4.2 billion in 2011.” He feels Mexico government has cleaned out America. He stated that immigrants are coming to America and rising the crime rates, and are responsible for thousands of rapes, murders, and violent beatings. In 2011, the Government Accountability Office found that there were a “shocking 3 million arrests attached to the incarcerated alien population”. It seems like he plans to fix this problem by getting rid of them. He wants to blame Mexicans for high crime, when there is crime all over; especially right here in Chicago. I just do not think this plan is going to work because once some of them became citizens, you can’t just deport a citizen and I don’t