A Short Note On The Treaty Of Waitangi Essay

In 1840 the Māori chiefs and the English crown signed the Treaty of Waitangi which showed the dual heritage between the cultures and to develop a partnership to develop a shared future as we have today. This historical event has big impacts on Te Whāriki the way it was created with both Māori and Pākehā input to develop a curriculum that supports every child to develop as confident and competent learners. “.. all

They claimed that their rights to the land had not been extinguished by the Crown when their islands were taken over or annexed by Queensland. They still had a legal right to the land based on the legal concept of ‘native title’ – right of ownership based on traditional ownership of the land. The Queensland Government’s response was to pass the Coast Islands Declaratory Act, 1985.

The first paper by Ladner and Orsini, (2003) gives a detailed account, review and analysis of the First nations governance act. The paper reflects on the act and provides arguments supporting the fact that it is an example of a gentler, subtle form of colonialism that is still in practice today. It argues that although the government has well researched the problems affecting the first nations, it has not efficiently advocated the involvement of these people in their own welfare and improvement.

Cherokee lands to give up their claims. In the last article of the treaty states that ―the

What contact did you have with the Maori/ Europeans prior to signing/not signing the Treaty? “My contact with the Europeans has been very pleasant leading up to the Treaty signing. I am glad to be creating a sacred bond between our two cultures and continuing to introduce new things into each others lives. In addition I constantly have contact with missionaries as I believe in the word of the lord which they spread. The Europeans are honest people and I am very glad to be creating an agreement with

A Key conflict that endures as one of the most noteworthy events in New Zealand’s early history is the Waikato war of 1863-1864. The significance of the battles lies in the definition of the status of Maori and Pakeha in New Zealand. Particular historic debate surrounds whether the Waikato war was caused more primarily over the dispute of land or sovereignty. Maori were rising against British control and domination over them exhibited by establishment of the Kingitanga movement and the resistance to land sales. Responding in a way they saw that they had the right British invaded the Waikato. The outcomes of these events still hold debate and controversy in the regions of occurrence even today. With large loss of lives on both sides directly from the clashes, as Maori retained their pride refused to surrender to the British’s superior technology. New laws were passed as a result of the resistance involving shameless policy’s which marginalised Maori and there rights further. The consequences of this war were drawn out until the late 20th, when finally reparations were made in full.

New Zealanders, we have a problem. We suffer from something called tall poppy syndrome; where we repress those who exceed us - cutting down the poppies that grow taller towards the light. The reason that we do this, while also for reassurance of ego and uniformity of persona, is for equality. Inequality is a predominant negative to our modern world and is particularly present amongst things like financial status, sexual orientation, gender and race. For New Zealand, racial inequality and the oppression of indigenous, Maori people and their culture has been one of the most enduring problems it has faced since it was first settled by European colonists in the 18th century. The Maori were subjected to the theft of land, imprisonment, persecution and exploitation at the hands of the early settlers. One of the ripple effects of this oppression was a severe lack of education, leading to a dulled appreciation of the benefits a full and formal education can provide. Tall poppy syndrome is evident throughout humankind’s long history of cultural, religious and political disputes. New Zealand, unfortunately, is no exception.

Te Tiriti o Waitangi is a very important document for Aotearoa (New Zealand). The name Te Tiriti O Waitangi was from a place in Bay of Islands, where it was first signed on 6th February, 1840 (New Zealand History, 2014).It is an agreement between the Māori and English people. That was made between the British crown and about five hundred and thirty Māori chiefs (New Zealand History, 2014). There are two versions of Treaty of Waitangi, one of them is

The Maori, “Children of Heaven”, are the indigenous people of New Zealand. It has been thought that Polynesian navigator Kupe, discovered New Zealand in 950 AD, and named the island Aotearoa, “Land of the long white cloud”.1 The Maori migrated to New Zealand from the tropical islands of

Policy tensions surrounding culture in New Zealand have existed since the European settlers arrived. This is most prominently related to the nature of settler societies, not just in New Zealand but in many other nations around the world including Canada and Australia (Bromell, 2008, p. 31). But New Zealand is unique in the regards to the Treaty of Waitangi, which has set the foundations of the countries public policy and constitutional arrangements. The argument that New Zealand is bi-cultural is probably the most evident

On 6 February 1840, representatives of the British Crown and numerous Maori chiefs united in the ceremony of the signing of the Te Tiriti o Waitangi / Treaty of Waitangi documentation in the Bay of Islands, New Zealand, (New Zealand Ministry of Justice, 2015). (1) This, signified the official colonisation of New Zealand and with this the promise of certain principles that were to be upheld by the British law, including that of Protection, Participation and Partnership, for all citizens now unified under the British Crown (MOH, 2000b). (2)

In Grace .v. Minister for Land Information (2014), a New Zealand Environment Court (NZEnvC) case, the primary legal considerations regarding compulsory public works acquisitions of Maori land were brought to the fore. The following case note aims to provide legal background to the aforementioned case, determine material facts which consequently give rise to the key legal issue, the ratio of the case and provide criticisms on its legal value. The underlying theme of preservation of Maori ancestral rights for the ongoing use and education of future generations is a profound one. Thus, the question arises, not whether the case has any prospective legal significance but to what extent.

This transformation of Māori from a previously solely spoken language into a written form had two major effects. The first was the ability, and so necessity to write the treaty in a Māori form, and secondly that, in order to communicate the concepts laid out in English, familiar conceptual ideas would have to be used in Māori, many of which had, through Luke, taken on a greater level of spiritual significance in regard to Christian thought. This can be seen in Māori conception of te Tiriti as a form of covenant . This notion of the treaty as covenant was an idea further enforced by the work of missionaries who were deeply involved in Māori life and politics, and one which, it is argued, helped to sway many Māori chiefs to sign . With recognition of the Anglican Church as the sending institution of the CMS missionaries who translated and endorsed the treaty to Māori chiefs and the realization of the role that Christian belief and conceptions played in Māori understanding of the treaty, it is without doubt that, as a church, we must take responsibility for te Tiriti and ensure that it is upheld. As such, its prominence and role within the structural framework laid out in Te Pouhere is a necessary and valid attempt by the Anglican Church in Aotearoa/New Zealand

The Treaty of Waitangi has always been Aotearoa, New Zealand’s founding document, however it’s status continues to change over time. Signed over 175 years ago, February 6th 1840, the document continues to cause much controversary and debate in its meaning and interpretation (Orange, 2011). It is the history that keeps repeating itself. During pre-colonisation of New Zealand, Britain entered partnership with Maori as protection from other colonisers and as help with legal trading according to British Maritime law. The treaty entered the scenario to concrete British Colonisation and secure this partnership. At this time, the treaty had begun a movement in Britain to acknowledge and regret the harmful effects of colonization they had seen in previous encounters. These good intentions were considered in the making of the treaty , but unfortunatley were addressed in a way that favoured the Crowns plans for New Zealand.

The treaty of Waitangi is considered to be the founding document of the English and European control and settlement in New Zealand. After the treaty’s signing in 1840 it has played a huge role in legal affairs and the treatment of both European New Zealanders and Maori New Zealanders. Though there is dispute as to the correct or incorrect translation from English to Maori and vice versa, the treaty has on the whole created a harmonious existence between the two cultures.