A Simple Random Sample Of 200 Australian University Students Ages 18 And Above Via An Internet Survey Essay

This survey is targeted towards the grade 12 students at Bayview Secondary School who have been in the Canadian education system for over 3 years and completed the careers course. The sampling technique I used to collect the survey responses is voluntary-response sampling. This method was chosen since it is the easiest and quickest way to collect data from the target population.

To ensure the proposed study is academically, professionally, and ethically sound, researchers shall complete a risk assessment on the proposed method (participants, materials and design) of the study. This risk assessment will form the basis of the application to Swinburne University’s Research Ethics Office for ethical review. This application will address the risks identified with the participants used, including recruitment and informed consent, as well as data and publication arrangements.

Part I: The legal considerations would be to inform the participants that there would be no harm or risk to the participants. Since the participants are adolescents the researcher needs to obtain a secure informed consent from the parent or guardian before they participate. The researcher’s ethics are to provide full disclosure to the participants. The researcher should be open and honest to the participants regarding the study. The researcher’s ethical consideration is to protect the privacy of each participant. This can be accomplished by ensuring confidentiality and by having the data stored securely. Also, the researcher should

Respect for human dignity includes two rights; the right to self-determination and the right to full disclosure. When conducting a research study these two rights must be maintained to ensure that the participants are not coerced into participation and that they are making the choice of their own free will. Patients must be provided with all the information necessary to make an informed decision and voluntarily participate. No deception or concealed data collection can be done because it will violate the patients’ rights.

The study was conducted to determine the post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among family members of homicide victims (Sharpe, Osteen, Frey, & Michalopoulos, 2014). The authors made sure to get approval from the institutional review board (IRB) and started recruiting a sample of participants who met with a certain criteria (Sharpe et al., 2014). This criteria was not only to benefit the research study but also to make sure the research was ethical to the respondents. An example of one of the criteria was the respondent had to be “at least 18 years of age at the time of the study” (Sharpe et al., 2014, p.

The Class of 2019 page has over 9,000 members and since it requires a knights mail account it guarantees these participants are students. The Greek life groups also are all students which gave me even more results that I needed. I received 99 responses but 2 responses were from outside my target demographic so I used the tool Survey Monkey offers to delete their responses. I had ten questions that I asked. I asked their age so that I could decide if they were the right demographic for my study. I asked what video streaming websites they belonged to or used. I also asked the hours a day they spend on television and the hours they spend with friends, as well as if they watched television alone or with a friend. I asked if they watched similar television shows to their friends, as well as if they would prefer to go out with a friend or to watch Netflix. Finally I asked what device they use to watch Netflix along with how many episodes in a row they usually watch. I wanted easy quick questions so that I didn’t take up too much of my respondent’s time. I included an “Other” option because some of the questions I knew could have answers I was unaware of. The information I gathered in the survey was to see what college student’s television streaming habits were like so that I could analyze them.

Assessing ethical concerns is of key importance in planning, performing, and evaluating research, and includes four key issue areas of protection from harm, informed consent, right to privacy, and professional code of APA ethics (Cozby & Bates, 2012) These four areas of ethical issues must be considered whenever research involves human participants. Another important area for the researcher to review relative to ethical issues in human research is the importance of gaining an understanding of the internal review board (IRB). The purpose of this paper is to examine ethical concerns, and provide a brief review of the IRB, including when completion of an IRB application is required.

The findings of the survey responses can relate back to the literature review on how my data has shown that male drivers tend to get stopped more frequently that female drivers, just like other research that has been done. Police just consider males to be more suspicious than females from what many studies have shown. As well has non-whites and younger drivers are more likely to be stopped by police. Back to literature reviewed, many research that has been done have shown Blacks or any other non-white race would most likely be targeted by police. With age, police officers tend to suspect young drivers of crimes such as underage drinking, or drug related crimes. With the data collected of such a small, yet decent amount of respondents, sample has shown what much other research has shown about the relationship between gender, age, and race that do play a significant role in who the police decide to stop.

The researcher assumes that the respondents will be at least 20 years of age. Additionally, the researcher assumes that the respondents will be able to read and write English.

, we interviewed 165 students. 79% of the students were in ninth grade as Freshman, 8% were in tenth grade, 10% were in eleventh grade, and 4% were in twelfth grade as seniors. The participants were made up of 58% male

The poll of 1,189 adults, with a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percent,

In Waugh’s case study the ethical considerations that the research faced was conducting and delivering an electronic survey, warranted data, survey being bias, use of small sample size, inaccurate data and lack of time management. “The NHMRC framework brings together within a single national organisation the functions of research funding and development of advice” (NHMRC 2017). The NHRMC framework was used in the survey. Waugh’s research of identifying stress-related issues through the general population working in law enforcement and finding out which ones of the genre population was exposed to traumatic death events, the framework was used to find out whether it was harm, discomfort and inconvenience. The NHMRC framework for the participants

Starting in 1972, the General Social Survey (GSS) used a four-category response scale for respondents to answer a question on how they view their own health, known as the self-reported health question (SRH) (Smith 2005, 1). The four-categories used were: poor, fair, good, and excellent (Smith et al. 2017, 385) Starting in 2002, the GSS started using both a four and five-category scale for people to respond to the SRH (Smith et al. 2017,1537). The five-category scale used the same measures from the four-category scale, but also included “very good” as the fifth option. The question is: which response category form gives a better ability to determine SRH among people?

In order to conduct the research, twenty-nine children and their families were selected from 426 different areas within England, Wales and Scotland. Some parents refused to take part in the research, while 76% agreed to be interviewed (Meltzer et al. 2009). The research that was organized determined that the violence affects different age groups and sexes in different ways.

There were 523 participants all undergraduates from psyc121 course at Victoria University of Wellington. All participants who gave consent and completed the questionnaire received course credit. This was also approved by the ethics committee and all participation in the study remained anonymous.