A Specific Culture Of Leadership

The first author wrote this chapter while a Marvin Bower Fellow at the Harvard Business School, and is grateful for their support.

The most useful culture assessment tools available to organizational leaders is the leadership competency tools. Here’s why? These tools relate to diverse cultures in the areas of organizational performance, productivity, and unity. This form of assessment has the potential of uncovering possible deficits in the leaders' different cultures and give the manager an opportunity to overcome perceived shortcomings. The leaders may require additional cultural intelligence training to be more effective. However, Human resource officials select future global leaders because these leaders already have acquired job-related technical knowledge (Daher, 2015). Groups at times often overlook interpersonal skills and cultural knowledge. For these reasons, initial cultural assessments are essential for new leaders.

Managers in today’s world are important assets to the multicultural organisations. Leadership styles of managers are highly important in terms of managing the team of followers, which has a correlation to the productivity and results that the team would achieve in the future. By having good management, it contributes to the success of the organisation. Hence, it is vital to identify the different leadership styles especially in different cultures to suit the working environment and culture of the organization. In the present multicultural global business industry, cultural differences can come in the way of the success of project completion (Anbari, Khilkhanova, Romanova, & Umpleby , 2009) . It has been claimed that rigid leadership does not promote motivation and creativity, therefore, managers should lead by flexible leadership and be culturally sensitive, adapting to different cultures, for the team to be able to move forward and reach their goals (Anabri et al. 2009). The way a manager’s leadership takes place also affect’s the experience of the employees at work and the relationship between the manager and the employee. Jariya (2012, p66) states that ‘different cultures differ in the values they endorse, people from these cultures often interpret the same managerial practices

The rise in China from a poor, stagnant country to a major economic power within a time span of twenty-eight years is often described by analysts as one of the greatest success stories in these present times. With China receiving an increase in the amount of trade business from many countries around the world, they may soon be a major competitor to surpass the U.S. China became the second largest economy, last year, overtaking Japan which had held that position since 1968 (Gallup). China could become the world’s largest economy in decades.

A key theme of this book is that effective leadership requires considerable self-knowledge about one's own cultural beliefs and assumptions. Terrell and Lindsey (2009) review historical and contemporary beliefs about race, ethnicity, language, gender, and social class, and they challenge readers to examine their own experiences and beliefs in these areas. They suggest that development of a culturally proficient perspective will help provide prospective leaders with an ethical framework for their

China is the largest market in the world, and probably the hardest business environment. This narrative reflex China’s immense diversity, complexity, and its enormous competitive intensity is unrivalled versus the world.

Leadership style is the driving force behind an organizations effectiveness and overall success. Leaders control the heart of an organization; they control the direction, values, and employee’s level of commitment to the organization. Consistency and reliability are key traits that followers look for in a leader. Team members need to understand and know that the actions of their leaders will be within the expected realm of who they are and how they have presented themselves. A leader’s inconsistency could be viewed by followers as unreliable, unpredictable, and hard to follow. So how does a leader navigate an organizations multi-faceted culture while cultivating success and effectiveness?

Leadership is perceived and defined in many ways, but in the end, every concept of leadership is brought back on the focus of people. Followers’ reaction towards a leader decides the effectiveness of his or her specific style of governance. Because of the importance of the subordinate, leaders must treat everyone they manage with dignity and respect. To achieve this feat, the leader must understand the meaning of culture and other aspects which stem from it and social perceptions and biases which lead to schema and ultimately unjust stereotypes. In the leadership textbook Preparing to Lead: Introduction to Leadership and Development written by LCDR Litchford, USN and LT Bryant, USN, it defines culture as “the totality of learned socially transmitted

Cultural differences between countries have strong effects on individual personality and behavior, as well as on organizational culture (Hofstede 2001). These differences can be a significant barrier for an international business leader. Failure to understand and adapt to these differences may

In today’s dynamic business environment leadership must understand the value and importance of their organizations’ culture. While it may never be formally defined, leadership must have a vision of their intended culture and a plan for creating and maintaining it. This vision will serve as the potter’s clay that determines everything from the dress code to the organizational structure. This paper examines two methods organizations can choose to create and maintain a healthy culture.

Leadership is a concept most people feel informed enough to discuss, but that few are truly educated sufficiently to comment on. Therefore, it is instructive to consider the leadership styles of people with very different approaches both to better understand the diversity underlying leadership, as well as to appreciate the effective and less effective strategies that underlie different leadership outcomes. For that reason, this essay will consider the styles of two leaders who are less visible in this highly contentious presidential election season: Jill Stein (the Green Party nominee) and Gary Johnson, the Libertarian candidate. The leadership styles of both are very different, yet they are aligned in the sense that both are outsider candidates struggling to gain momentum from a disaffected electorate. This essay begins with a theoretical discussion of leadership more generally and then turns to the two leaders as case studies, comparing and contrasting them and drawing conclusions about how they both work within the same public sphere and for putatively similar ends (i.e., gaining votes).

With China emerging as a global power in business within the last decade, knowing about doing business in China has become more important than ever. There are both many advantanges and challenges with doing business in China in this modern era, and understanding both sides of this coin is the key to being successful in China. Some aspects to keep in mind include the cultural barrier, the price of the work force in China compared to the United States, and have the “made in China” brand be accepted back in the United States.

There are numerous differing assumptions about the leadership from other cultures that occurs across the globe specifically in regards to high-context cultures like “China, China, Korea, Japan, France, Greece, and many Arab countries”, more emphasis is placed upon perception rather than what is “actually written down or said”

In times of rapid globalisation and economic development growth, the environment of business has become more and more complicated as a huge number of firms want to globally expand their businesses. Subsequently, the managerial implications of cross-cultural management is the challenge of this development. As Abbe (2007) states, cross-cultural leadership has developed as a way to understand leaders who work in the global markets. Culture is the “software of mind” that can influence people’s patterns of thinking and behaving.

Often we as humans make assumptions of other cultures based on stereotypes and cliches However, we fail by relying on such narrow minded thinking. The nature of culture is very complex, and thus when observed requires a deeper understanding and awareness. These statements addressed by Erin Meyer truly resonated with me and my future self Looking into my future as a leader in the Healthcare field, I realized I need to become more culturally aware. The ever-changing work environment requires a leader who can lead across many cultures and use the differences that arise as an asset. In being a leader myself I will be exposed to multiple cultures and therefore must embrace the words of Brett “Avoid imposing single culture based approaches on