A Study Of Feminine Psyche Essay

Saving Sourdi is a short story, which deals with the struggles and perceptions of Nea, who is one of the characters. The main characters are the elder sister Sourdi and the younger sister Nea. These two sisters are close and grew together all through to their life. Their growth and togetherness exhibit their different roles played in this story thus clearly bringing out their definite characters. This story is illustrated to show how the character of Nea and her viewpoint shapes the interpretation of the reader about the story. Saving Sourdi is a tale that holds up the strong bonds of sisterhood and family and change as people grow to maturity. The story is created from a point of view that can influence how one views the characters and

The memoir contains a number of other fires that claim houses, sheds, and injure other characters. Fire is said to represent a trend of chaos that is both natural and staged by man. The theme of fire relates closely to other themes concerning nature and pollution that

There are also themes of immigration and culture. It is interesting that cultural responsibilities to her husband is what really separates Nea and Sourdi. Coming of age and the role men is also something. Yet again, it is the cultural instance of the man Mr. Chhay that takes Sourdi away; despite any protestations of his uncouthness Duke actually may have made for something more inclusive for Nea as he is delayed in development like Nea; symbolized by the fact Duke and Nea even held hands while present with Nea in the car. With Mr. Chhay in the life of Sourdi, there is very little role for Nea; perhaps this is why Nea hates so much that fact that he calls her ‘little sister’ (Chai, 2001). Overall Sourdi represents a choice to become that her mother became, a wife and mother.

Sight is a motif present from the cover page to the end. In the novel Marie-Laure is a schoolgirl who loses her vision by the age of thirteen. In Part One, the author introduces the Sea of Flames, a rock fabled to give its wielder an eternal life. This blessing however is paired with a curse. The stone wielder will lose all the people he loves. “‘Why not”,

This reveals the theme of the novel just as Raami and her mother escape the dangers of Cambodia and take a helicopter to Vietnam. The major theme of the novel is that words, whether spoken or written, can be constructive and destruction. There are countless events in the novel where words proved to be constructive. For example, Raami’s father was a successful poet and used his words to inspire others. Another example is how Raami’s mother speaks in lyrically beautiful sentences to console and comfort Raami in her times of desperation. Some events in which words were destructive were when Raami revealed to the spies about her father’s lineage and when the Khmer Rouge attempted to create propaganda through radio broadcasts to discourage the rebel forces and the citizens of Cambodia. In summary, Raami’s statement is significant to the theme of the novel as it encapsulates the effects of words throughout the

Prior to reading the article Doing Gender, I have never paid attention to the concept of doing gender. I found it interesting how these roles go so unnoticed because they are so enforced in our society. We never stop to think or questions if an individual’s actions are masculine or feminine. For example, some of us are just so use to having our mothers cook and our dad’s do all the heavy lifting but we never stop to think why is it like this or what does this represent.

This study adopts the analytical descriptive methods to analyze the concepts of power and resistance in Collin’s Catching Fire (2009). Moreover, this study focuses on the description and the analysis of the events, attitudes, behaviors of characters, along with the symbols that embody the concepts of power and resistance.

Throughout today’s society, almost every aspect of someone’s day is based whether or not he or she fits into the “norm” that has been created. Specifically, masculine and feminine norms have a great impact that force people to question “am I a true man or woman?” After doing substantial research on the basis of masculine or feminine norms, it is clear that society focuses on the males being the dominant figures. If males are not fulfilling the masculine role, and females aren’t playing their role, then their gender identity becomes foggy, according to their personal judgment, as well as society’s.

It feels as though most of the time when thinking about psychology and the great contributions that have been made to it, that most of them have been from men, but along the way there have been several influential women that have contributed to the field of psychology as well. Just like men, there were several women who were pioneers, theorists, and counselors; many of these women have contributed to the field of psychology in their own special between the years of 1850 and 1950. Of all these amazing women who are pioneers, theorists, and counselors, the one who stands out the most is Anna Freud. This paper will go on to explain Anna Freud’s

Society should be more open minded with the topic of gender identity. Our society does not like rapid changes when they are publicly made; there is always a dispute or an opposition against those unexpected changes. The LGBTQIA+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and asexual) community is the “rapid change” that society finds difficult to deal with. Although, this community has always existed, but it has never been publicly recognized like it is today. Gender Identity is a very complicated topic to talk about because it has so many concepts that only those who find themselves as part of the LGBTQIA+ community can fully understand.

The textbook identifies four approaches to gender development: biological, interpersonal, cultural, and critical. Define each theory. Then answer the following question: which of the theoretical approaches to gender do you find the most valid? Be sure to include at least two examples from your own experience as well as two scholarly sources to back up your claim.

The resentment within the young girl’s family is essential to the novel because one can understand the young girl better as she makes her decision.

S. Eliot’s ‘The Wasteland’. She is a connecting link between culture that she belongs to and literature that she records. She represents the voice of the sub-altern history in both senses that it is a female voice coming from the marginal space. Her narrative is part of the residual culture that Raymond Williams defines in his essay “Dominant, Residual and Emergent.”8 According to him, the residual narrative always exists with the dominant culture and comprises of the tendency to reach back to a past where the meaning can be located, and “which still seems to have significance, because [it] represents areas of human experience, aspiration and achievement which the dominant culture neglects, undervalues, opposes, represses or even cannot recognize.”9 This residual thus needs to be incorporated in order for the dominant narrative to make sense. The prolific use of myths in post-modern texts like Eliot’s “The Wasteland” and also in Kanthapura questions the relation between past and present and thus obliterates the distinction between fact and fiction. The historic-writing process that Achakka participates in is not based on a personal narrative but on ‘reality’ that is drawn from a perceiving collective and therefore representing a totality. She stands as the symbol of the determination of all women of Kanthapura who draw their strength from Moorthy as well as their religious faith. Kenchamma is hailed as the solution to their every problem and thus the deity is made customary while their leader Moorthy is exalted and

Raju, the central character of this novel, grows up near a railway station, and becomes a shopkeeper and then a guide. He meets Rosie, a beautiful dancer and her husband whom Raju gave a nickname “Marco” because he dressed like a man about to undertake an expedition with his thick coloured glasses, thick jacket and a thick helmet over which was perpetually stretched a green, shinny, waterproof cover, giving him thin appearance of space traveller. Marco is a scholar and anthropologiest who is more interested in his research than in his wife. He has no interest in his wife. Through the service of Raju as a tourist guide, Rosie want to see the cobra dance and Marco want to see cave painting. Rosie and Marco quarrel constantly. Whlie Marco is always studying carve painting, Raju falls in love with Rosie. When Marco found that Raju an Rosie have becomes lover, Marco return to

Romesh Gunesekera; the author of the novel Reef (1994), begins the story with a young boy by the name of Triton, entering Mr Salgado’s household as a “Kolla”, meaning boy, and starting to become weary of himself and his own capabilities. Throughout the novel, Triton faces certain hardships, but quickly learns to overcome them as he begins to develop a sense of responsibility and independence within the household. Mr Salgado becomes the “centre of Triton’s world” and he is someone that Triton looks up to and wants to become. However, everything changes when Miss Nili becomes the central aspect of Mr Salgado’s life and changes the relationships within the household, allowing Triton to see things from a new perspective. Throughout the novel we see how Triton plays the role of an Outsider as well as Insider within the home and how he starts becoming very observant with regards to Miss Nili. In this essay I will discuss how Triton’s role in Mister Salgado’s household alters and becomes a turning point in the novel.