A Study On The Work Of A Teacher At Harvard University Essay

Almost every student has been there: staring at his/her computer trying to get an assignment done when they have twenty other obligations swinging over his/her head. Students are trying to find the fastest and easiest way to get the assignment completed. Many students will plagiarize intentionally or unintentionally at some point of their educational career. Plagiarism is the act of taking someone else’s work or ideas then calling that work their own. There is no acknowledgement being given to the original author. In Trip Gabriel’s “Plagiarism Lines Blur for Students in Digital Age,” the internet has created new challenges for students being able to give credit to ideas and information. Often, Students do not understand that information on

Plagiarism cases can provide insight on the dire consequences that can occur if a student is caught plagiarizing within an academic setting. A former student of Rutgers University, Amanda Serpico, was accused by her professor of plagiarizing on her opinion paper in her argumentation class (Bailey, 2011). Amanda received credit for using citations in a majority of the paper and providing the sources in the reference section, but she did not properly cite at least three verbatim passages that she used within her work (Bailey, 2011). Amanda utilized Turnitin software to review her paper and to detect plagiarism before turning in the assignment for grading to her professor (Bailey, 2011). The plagiarism accusation resulted in Amanda receiving a failing grade on the paper, a failing grade in the course, and being denied admission to several graduate schools. (Bailey,

The paper responds to this proposition with a thesis that understanding the ethical reasoning provided by students in defending plagiarism is crucial in preventing it in student populations. The reasons can provide the basis for specific action-orientated recommendations to reduce plagiarism and to design programs to encourage originality and

As one begins to grasp the concept of Schroth’s (2012) article The Plagiarism Plague, it is easy to identify the author’s dissatisfaction for plagiarism and the negative connotations he has for someone who is involved in this heinous offense. He initiates and summarizes his commentary with personal stories of how plagiarism has affected him. Schroth offers several solutions for the copyright issue that is upon us; he states, “the sanction for plagiarism must be at least an F on the paper, accompanied by a letter in the student's file to be consulted if it happens again, with the understanding that a second offense would mean expulsion.” Schroth was also sure to mention the collective approach necessary from all educators for his solution to be implemented. He believes the “policy will be effective only with leadership from the president and full cooperation from the faculty.” The writer goes on to explain how plagiarism has become an epidemic in this society and the effects of its prevalence thereof. Although plagiarism has become rampant in this society, it is still immoral and unethical. College students continue to plagiarize however, because they refuse to regard their education as a top priority and it has become culturally acceptable for people to falsify information without any serious penalties for their dishonesty.

Plagiarism cases can provide insight on the dire consequences that can occur if a student is caught copying within an academic setting. The professors accused Amanda Serpico, a former student of Rutgers University, of plagiarizing on her opinion paper in her argumentation class (Bailey, 2011). Amanda obtained partial credit for using citations in a majority of the writing and providing the sources in the reference section, but she did not properly cite at least three verbatim passages that she used within her work (Bailey, 2011). Amanda utilized Turnitin software to review her document and to detect plagiarism before turning in the paper for grading, but the plagiarism accusation still resulted in her receiving a failing grade on the assignment and in the course and denied admission to several graduate schools. (Bailey, 2011).

A policy created by school institutions is the honor-code, which prevents students from plagiarizing and cheating off one another. Among scholars, there’s a debate on whether this policy is still in appropriate use today. Acknowledging the issue is Susan Greenberg, a journalism instructor and writer for The Washington Post, and Lynn Morton, an English professor at Queens University of Charlotte. Through examination of the two authors, both provide insightful background about honor-code practices on college campuses. However, their evidence presents opposing points-of-view on the subject.

The students at Lakewood Ranch High School also insinuated that plagiarism was not discussed in class, suggesting that they were insufficiently informed about plagiarism and what it represented. Say this is true the corrective measure would be to discuss plagiarism at the beginning of the school year as well as providing a review during the middle of the academic year. Regardless, these adolescents are capable of understanding concepts, standard principles of morality (Feldman, 2014). Therefore, in my opinion they were aware of their actions of intentional copying and submitting another person’s work. Which ultimately resulted with a greater desire for rewards despite the possibility of

Almost all colleges enforce policy when students commit plagiarism. With regard to plagiarism, two authors’ arguments differ. One of authors, Emma Teitel, a student in Dalhousie University, argued that the punishment of plagiarism is un-fare. She was punished for plagiarism in her third year. She claimed that she just made a technical mistake on her essay and did not intentionally plagiarize from another author’s work (Teitel, November 8, 2011). On the other hand, according to Todd Pettigrew, a professor in Kings University, colleges should make a rule clearly for plagiarized assignments depending on the number of offenses. For example, for student who commits plagiarism the second time should get a stronger punishment than the first offense.

In the article “Are We raising a Generation of Helpless Kids?” by Mickey Goodman, Goodman writes about the generation that grew up between 1984-2002. Goodman says that kids rely on instant gratification including social media or even the web to find answers. She believes that kids are getting rewarded for accomplishing so little. Parent are too focus on doing their kid’s homework for them and stopping them from having self-reliance. Children need to be able to rely on their opinions when they come up with new ideas instead of asking others around them for their opinion. Parents are caught up on helicopter parenting, not letting their kids take risks and not preparing them for the future. Stopping a child from accomplishing their work, or school work the right way will make them look at their work negatively and keep them frustrated.

She reviews how educators can be very strict on enforcing honor-codes, but students have trouble understanding the line between original, individual work vs. plagiarized, group work. “As a journalism instructor, I have encouraged students to work together in ways that other honor-code-bound professors would deem “unpermitted collaboration--...” Teachers all have their own rule about plagiarism violations and explain to students the punishment they face if caught. Even though students received discipline in this one computer science class at Stanford University does not mean all instructors at honor-code schools are as rigorous when it comes to collaboration work among their students. Not every college upholds the same conduct when someone has been found at fault; every situation is different. The way one school approaches the situation may not be the way another school does. “Further, rates of overall cheating at honor-code schools rose slightly between the 1990-1991 and 2005-2006 school years, while they declined at no-code schools. As McCabe writes, the influence of honor codes “has eroded over the past two decades.” Greenburg includes no explanation why this decline and rise happened to farther her argument. Not enough anti-plagiarism encouragement methods in the schools could be a reason for the rise. Her connection of the two schools does not necessarily mean that

In Canada, copyright is strictly protected by law. Every year, college and university students write easy. Indeed, some students intentionally commit plagiarism, and, although some students do not want to commit plagiarism, they can be accused of plagiarism. Because, they may not clearly know the definition of plagiarism. Also, if the students who committed plagiarism did not know the penalties for plagiarism or they though schools could not know if their submission was plagiarized, probably, they would regret their behavior. Seneca and George Brown college policy have similar definitions of plagiarism, but different processes for verifying and penalties for plagiarism.

In the New York Times article, Students Disciplined in Harvard Scandal, plagiarism plays an important role in students’ academic success. As explained in the article, many students are accused of academic dishonesty every year. One would not expect such scandals from such a prestigious university as Harvard. Many students were forced to withdraw from the courses as punishment and were not able to attend until a couple of semesters after. It turned into a big controversy because many athletes were forced to take a break from sports. Also, some professor assistants were involved.

There was over 100 Harvard students was suspected cheated on the “Introduction to Congress” course. According to Harvard policy, cheated students had to leave the university for one year. However, Farhad Manjoo – a student in Harvard University, claimed that students who discussed in this exam should be celebrated instead of probation.

The future of the world is in the hands of the children. Whether the future be a positive or negative one depends on the children and the education they receive. The education of a child is so valuable that one needs to consider the importance of the child's education. Also, one needs to consider how to go about nurturing those bright minds so one day they can become independent individuals. As Educators, one needs to be aware of the short-term effects as well as the long-term effects in which education may play on the child's views of the world.

Students recognize the obvious examples of academic dishonesty such as copying during an exam or quoting extensively without a citation. They can be much less clear on how much collaboration is allowed, what kind of paraphrasing is appropriate to summarize a source or whether one assignment can be turned in for two different classes. If students are not accustomed to thinking about the ownership of ideas, they tend to underreport their sources.