A Study of Digital Literacy in a Marginalised Community

|Proportion of students who have cheated in at least one form = 37/90 = 0.4111 |

<a href="http://socialwork.adelphi.edu/global/emailthispage.php" target="_blank"><img src="./Real Cases Andrea R. Case Study Part 1 Adelphi University_files/email.gif" alt="" width="178" height="23" border="0"></a><br>

In 1990, email was not a viable substitute as it was still a part of the research network and not commercially available. The only substitute was standard mail and facsimile. Therefore, in recent years, attractiveness has lowered due to the introduction of another substitute.

Proportion of all business students at Rocky University who were not involved in some type of cheating, are as follows: p1 = 0.1 (9/90).

After the school approved this research, all three teachers of 433 math were contacted for the possibility of the study being conducted in their classrooms. All three happily agreed to take part in this study. Approximately, three days before data collection, the teachers passed out an Opt-Out form (see Appendix I) to the students. This form allowed the students and their parents to choose not to participate in the study. All students who do not return the form participated in the Do-Now. The teacher received a manila folder with two different variations of the Do-Now, fluent and disfluent (see Appendix II and III). The folder contained the exact number of papers as students in the class. Within the folder, there was an equal number of fluent

Average size of a class is 22 students. They have 44 clubs and sports, they have produced 60

The student data file was used as the data source. The sample size included one hundred men and one hundred women. Thirty-five out of one hundred men had not declared for a degree. Fifteen out of one hundred women had not declared for a degree. The level of

The population is undergraduate students of UM and we eliminated the unsuitable sample based on the information of questionnaires (exclude the outliers, blank questionnaire, context is contradictory and so on). Then we selected 30 questionnaires per college year which year 1 to year 4 (30*4=120) from all the completed questionnaires. We used convenience sampling method to distribute the online questionnaires openly. And we received the completed questionnaires online which are from google form.

, we interviewed 165 students. 79% of the students were in ninth grade as Freshman, 8% were in tenth grade, 10% were in eleventh grade, and 4% were in twelfth grade as seniors. The participants were made up of 58% male

This survey spans across the mid-level and high-level schools of United States, which are believed to represent a cross-section of the national population. About 66 – 80% of the American schools participate in the survey on an average, and the students’ participation rate stands at an average of 79 – 83%.

represent 52%. which was unsatisfactory level. As regard the percentage distribution of correct and incorrect

it is important to inform the student or students in the classroom that will be utilizing system and

with this research was that the results are only based on 29 students and 27 of them

All the measures that are mentioned in the textbook are important. However, there a few of these measures that are not as important compared to the others listed. One of these measures involve the school mail.

In addition, there is a problem because the current situation in colleges and universities are having issues and multiple problems concerning the involvement of technology in class and at home. Surely the use of computers are now direly needed to discuss and deliberate on the several subjects taught in high school and colleges. To the contrary, children and young adults have been found failing in class by reason of