A Universal Language : The Idea Of A Universal Language

“Intrinsic arguments describe the English language as providential, rich, noble and interesting. Such arguments tend to assert what English is and what other languages are not”. As mentioned previously, notwithstanding that the english language is widely-spoken around the world, diversity is important and for many individuals language is the basis of their culture. Making english the global language is essentially

When my grandfather was thirty, he could speak four languages. He would talk to his parents in Farsi, his friends in French, his neighbors in English, and his cousins in German. Fifty years later, he continues to surround himself with the culture of those he has met and connected with. He may be living in a largely Farsi speaking community, but the cultural appreciation fostered after years of stumbling through three foreign languages has followed him. Language unlocks doors between different peoples and cultures, ultimately laying the foundation for clear communication and honest discourse. We currently live in a world where the

English has become the most widespread and powerful language on Earth. The imperial English Empire spread English across the globe; from America to Asia. English’s position in the world was cemented by US cultural and diplomatic dominance; evident in American movies, fast food, and clothing. English has proven it is not moving anywhere anytime soon, as English only grows in use over time. Thus a debate has arisen: Should English be the official Universal Language? On one hand, English can harm other cultures, international relations, and scientific development; however, English is very flexible and widely used, making it the perfect candidate for a global language.

Although Ms. Wallraff wants the English Language to be the universal language and wishes everyone to speak the language, she seems skeptical about the implementation of the language and wonder if everyone would be able to understand the language. No doubt, English is a globally-recognized language, but it seems

According to the speculations of linguistic expert, John McWhorter, who wrote the article, “What the World Will Speak in 2115,” in one hundred years English will become the most widely understood language. If current trends continue, in the future one can imagine a world in which humans all share a single universal language. Having a common language would potentially open the doors to many opportunities for increased economic activity and cultural interaction. Additionally, as we travel into the 22nd Century, lesser used and more complex languages that are spoken today will become extinct. Subsequently, the few languages that survive will evolve into

Language can be seen as a communication barrier for some. Sometimes it may be difficult to talk to a customer, distant relative, or just a person walking down the street asking for directions. Now imagine a world where every single human being spoke the same language; a place where your distant relative from another country suddenly speaks the same language as you and you can begin to appreciate or dislike them even more; where now you are connected to billions of people who you can easily communicate with; where one universal language can now progress humankind.

universal language that transcends all communication barriers. All of this knowledge will help me to better serve

In an ever changing world we have seen the number and complexity of languages become reduced. In a Wall Street Journal article entitled What the World Will Speak in 2115, John H. McWhorter advocates for the world to see these changes as necessary and a way for communication worldwide to become more efficient and simplified. McWhorter shows how language has been streamlined for centuries as a way for citizens to adapt rather than viewed as an extinction of culture. Modern English is likely to become the dominant language worldwide but more so for the fact that it can be easily learned and is open to transformation with the times. Despite the fears of a world where lingual diversity is reduced, McWhorter suggests that there will still be variation to promote culture and communication with people from all backgrounds will be easier. The following is a summary and analysis of McWhorter’s main points describing the simplification of language. Following the summary of main points will be a hypothetical situation in what the world language could consist of 100 years from now.

Language is a vital tool for human beings. Human language is a measure for communicating thoughts, ideas, and identity to one another. Cultural relations, economic dealings, and the shaping of friendships are all dependent upon language. While it could be viewed that today’s languages are the result of past language extinctions, the death of language signifies a loss much greater than just words.

Have you ever experienced what it feels like to be bullied for your differences? I was in the 5th grade when I first encountered what it meant to be ridiculed for the way you speak. There was a time when my classmates made fun of another boy for the way he was speaking English. The boy was very quiet and only spoke to his cousin during class. The only language he was comfortable speaking was Chinese. My classmates at the time were taking turns recreating what they thought his language sounded like. Every so cruelly they mocked him in a way that was extremely racist; they were bullying him. I specifically remember one girl telling him, “Does your language sound like, ching chong, chong?”, she proceeded to laugh while she asked him. I never stuck up for him when I heard this, and I feel ashamed till this day that I didn’t speak up for him. Language shaming can come from anyone, and it takes many forms. In “Coming to Language” by Jimmy Santiago Baca, the passage gives us a personal experience, he has with language shaming from a teacher and how it affected his life and his journey of finding freedom through writing. In addition we see, another example of language shaming in “Living with Dyslexia” by Gareth Cook where he talks about his learning disorder and how it altered his relationship with teachers and his life. There is great similarity between Baca, Cooks and I’s encounter with teachers and language shaming. Since I’ve been in college, I have had three professors tell me

Language is used to communicate and convey meaning from one person to another. It is an arbitrary system of sounds and symbols in which it is contextualised and is used to express cultural identity and social relationships. Language can be seen by the way individuals communicate through gestures and facial and body expressions. Language can be heard through voice and attitude (Gee & Hayes, 2011). Language is diverse in the sense that different languages have different words for the same concept. However language allows communication of values and beliefs. Kilickaya (2009) highlights that, ‘English is the best option for people from different backgrounds’. Within Standard English different registers are used to assist communication,

Human have the capability to utilize complicated language, exceedingly more than any other set on Earth. We collaborate in every distant to use language for cammunication; language is frequently used to communicate about and even invent and preserve our social world. Laguage use and human sociality are special parts of humanity as a consanguineous species.

　　　　Language is an essential part of our daily lives. Language is used to communicate with other people to meet our needs and satisfy our understandings. Everyone uses one language or another. Some have an advantage and are able to use

Human beings are unique creatures as we possess the ability to communicate, to learn in more than one language. It is displeasing to say that the day when a gorilla is able to teach a bonobo in the language that a chimpanzee uses, may never arrive. The case was different for Koko, the gorilla and Kanzi, the bonobo as the American Sign Language was involved (Prince-Hughes, 1987). What sets human beings apart is that we are the same species that are inhabiting various regions around the world and thus, we inherit individual languages. Our arterial language is determined by many factors such as, race, ethnicity and even religion. However, the occurrence of a person learning in a non-native language does arise. For example, a child that is raised in Britain who learns English in school might have a family that is from the Philippines and thus, speaks Tagalog. The child may be more fluent in speaking Tagalog than English and thus, may lead to learning difficulties in school as an English Language Learner, which

I believe what Sassower and Cicotello claim is that any art is political in nature whether intentional or not. This is because each artist was raised and socialized to have certain ideologies about the world they live in. Even as attempts are made to make images that are unique and with new ideas they play off of old ideas. The question after this is then, are there any universal images that would be read in the same way? A popular phrase that can be heard is, “A picture is worth a thousand words.”, but in the book Political Blind Spots the argument is more that an idea is worth