A Word Search Project on "Creativity"

In this video Ken Robinson touches on three main points. His first point he was talking about the education system and one's creativity. He gave two anecdotes about kids that showed that they are willing to take a chance and be creative. If you're not prepared to be wrong, you'll never come up with anything original. He believes that the education system institutionalizes people, and that people lose the creativity they had.

At that age and time, students do not understand what it means to be innovative and creative. In the novel, Brave New World, a director raises and conditions human embryos to not be creative and to only follow the rules. In real life, students need a figure of authority, or a teacher, to guide them in certain directions and the only place where they can be taught how to use creativity to their favor is at school. In Brave New World, their figure of authority guided them into the direction of not being creative and as a result millions of humans were boring and felt no desire or need to be different. One of the characters in Brave New World explains that without art, science, and religion, human life is not worth living. If students take the class in creativity they learn that from those three components grows gift of creativity. Without the desire to be different and creative, which would be taught in the class, society would unfortunately decline to a point where trivial culture becomes the most important thing and civilization would result in an abundance of passivity and

Ken Robinson is a university professor who challenges the way we are educating our children. He uses passion and humor to emphasize the importance of creativity and the need for a learning revolution. From Ken’s personal experiences, he has concluded professors tend to only live from their heads, and “slightly more to one side”. Having these professors responsible to teach us what is right and wrong is no dought steering new generations views on what we should value. Creativity is becoming stigmatized, causing individuals to ignore many career paths and conform to our set standards. He states, “we don’t grow into creativity, we grow out of it. Or rather we get educated out of it”. There are so many more types of intelligence, however we categorize one above all. Potential talent is being wasted.

Sir Ken Robinson makes an entertaining and profoundly moving case for creating an education system that nurtures rather than undermines creativity. I fully agree with everything Sir Ken Robinson discusses in his speech. The importance of creativity, originality, and the arts have been deemed nonessential in the public school system. The emphasis placed on math, the sciences, and test scores have stifled many children from discovering and flourishing at their talents. If children are not exposed to the arts and the ingenuity needed to think for themselves how will they have the ability to produce an original story, even if they are taught writing and grammar.

Creativity or the lack of encouraging creativity can be seen declining as you get lower in the class level in Anyons research. She states “Work tasks do not usually request creativity” and “Creativity is not often requested in social studies and Science projects”. In an article entitled “The Impact of Creativity on the Brain” by Judy Willis M.D; M.E.D posted on the website Radtech.com. “Neuroscience and cognitive science research are increasingly providing information that correlates creativity with intelligence; academic, social, and emotional success; and the development of skill sets and the highest information processing (Executive functions)”. This basically states that if creativity is encouraged then the upper intelligence functions of students are developed which includes social and emotional success. Which shows that if you stifle creativity you basically limit the

In the essay “Creativity in the Classroom” written by Ernest L Boyer, the essay talks about creativity in the classroom and what can affect or empower creativity to occur. At the beginning, the writer stated that if the students and the faculty did not work together to create a prosperous ambiance, and did not see that they are having an important thing to do, the effective education atmosphere will be minimized. Another point that the writer stated carefully was when the professor spoiled the book and the students did not react disappointed because they did not need to read the book they had the information’s that they need from the professor. Therefore, in my opinion, the writer point was that students need to get serious about their

In the context of creativity’s stated definition, we will proceed to group our arguments into three themes of factors: cognitive ability, expertise training, and environmental conditions. The human brain is highly adaptable and can continue to develop new cognitive abilities, even past adulthood (Norman, 2015). Proper cognitive expertise and training can help workers produce and operate in ingenious ways (Ginamarie, Lertiz & Mumford, 2004). Finally, the working environment can both motivate or stifle creative output. Managers can influence all three components: expertise, thinking skills, and motivation (Amabile, 1998).

“Do Schools Kill Creativity?” by ken Robinson is a very powerful speech, as well as a good insight on the other side of the spectrum. Mr. Robinson begins his speech he mentions the amount of creativity we as humans have and how we have no such idea where we are headed in the future. Ken makes a point that we are educating and have been educating people to be prepared for the future. He asks why. We do not know what the next few years bring, how do we educate people properly for it. As Mr. Robinson continues he makes a point that creativity should be as important as literacy within education. Throughout the speech he gives countless examples where simple creativity and being different has brought people success and lead them down a path that math or literature never could.

Paulus & Nijstad (2003) defined creativity as “the development of original ideas that are useful or influential”(p.3). That is to say,

In the video “do schools kill creativity?” presented by Ken Robinson. He argues that school need to focus on creativity which the education system should be focusing on instead of only teaching education. Kids are taught to be educated in academics and not so much on the arts and music. In the video “where does creativity hide?” presented by Amy Tan. She said “the value of nothing, out of nothing comes something.” She only talked about her own creative process-nature, nurture, nightmares. Nature is brain science that causes muse effect, spiritually born with it, past lives, psychosis or depression. She thought that near death is good for creativity. She said creativity is inability to stop looking at associations.

When a test determines if you pass a grade or have to take the a course over, teachers tend to teach students only what they need to know to pass. Teachers have to “teach to the test” which means that they have no room in their lesson plans for activities such as art and music which encourage and cultivate creativity. The instructors must teach the “right” answer and in doing so punish children for the seemingly incorrect one, the one that is not so much wrong as creative (Shellenbarger 2011). When creativity in students is not fostered, it dies, decreasing individualism. With standardized tests come standardized learning, and with standardized learning comes standardized children who are no longer free to live through childhoods that are uniquely theirs. Yes, there is the possibility that a child could strike out on their own and create an inimitable life, but without the opportunity to nurse their creative tendencies due to an overabundance of structured class time spent “teaching to the test”, the chances are extremely low

First and foremost, people depend too much on technology and are lazy to use their brain, this reduces the creativity in humans. There were times when people used to spend their time in creative activities, with their friends and family, but today whenever we are idle and feel bored, we just pick up our smartphone, laptop or

Creativity is equally as important as literacy, and we need to start treating it that way in schools around the world. According to Ken Robinson’s claim in his, “How Schools Kill Creativity” speech, he believes this to be exceptionally true. All children are creative and talented, however, we have grown up in a world where we believe that it’s wrong to exemplify our creativity. Robinson uses both, pathos, and ethos to help make his claim. He arises emotion in you; he causes you to really think, to trust him, and to question ultimately, how things are being done in the educational system. We as a world have become so consumed with the idea of putting each child into a category of what they’re going to be successful in, regardless of their creativity or passions. You’re either good at math, science, or English; everything is based on your academic ability. What happens then to the people who aren’t academically smart, but are more creative? They are then made to feel that what they have to offer the world simply isn’t good enough, but the truth is, it is good enough. Over time however, we are taught out of our creativity. Schools around the world kill creativity by instilling a sense of fear in the child that what they are doing, and how they feel is wrong, this ultimately discourages them, and they fall victim to the industrialized educational system that we have present day. Robinson believes now more than

When individuals ask about creativity, typically they have pre conceived notion of what is creativity. Studies from Business insider claims that school are trying to limit creativity by forcing classes that are little to no interest to students. Those who ponder the idea about what is truly creative are individuals who can be reason with. The art of creativity is one's own perspective; what one accepts as ludicrous other might believe to be brilliant. A ted talk by Sir Ken Robinson's proven this statement by using a child who fidgets a lot as an example of how most saw her as ill, but actually she's a talented dancer who later on became a prodigy in ballet. So, if schools took away her creativity, then she wouldn’t have reached her full potential.

“On Defining Creativity” is a dry and scholarly article written to persuade readers’ views regarding usage of the terms “creative” and “creativity.” The article is convincing, and uses logical reasoning combined with etymology to craft an argument. “How ‘Rock Star’ Became a Business Buzzword” is an observation (rather than an attempt to redefine a word like “On Defining Creativity”) that is entertaining and well-supported. Both articles are convincing in their own respects, each employing different techniques. However, the articles do not make conclusive statements: “On Defining Creativity” ends in a multitude of questions and a call for more thought on the term “creativity,” and “How ‘Rock Star’ Became a Business Buzzword” ends with a tale