AAMI Formal Analysis

Bolman & Deal suggest that leaders display leadership behaviors in one of four types of frameworks: Structural, Human Resources, Political and Symbolic (Bolman & Deal, 2008). Unlike the other four frames, the Symbolic frame sees an organizational life an ongoing drama: individuals coming together to create context, culture, and meaning as they play their assigned roles and bring artistry and self-expression to their work (Schein, 2004). It is important for leaders who utilize the Symbolic leadership that what he or she does is important. The manager then has to relay this vision to the employees instilling in them that their work and the work of the organization is important and meaningful. Symbolic frame is important to every organization because it takes into account the traditions, ceremonies and rituals that make the company unique from other companies or departments within the organization itself.

The video was not formatted very well which made it very hard to follow. The names of some of the scholars were cut off. The quality of twenty five percent of the documentary was horrible because of very high pixilation which made it almost unwatchable. The documentary was also hurt by the repetitive scenes it kept replaying when there was someone speaking.

In Laura Hillenbrand’s Unbroken, Louie Zamperini experienced many situations that were both lucky and unlucky. These events helped shape him into who he is and prove that sometimes luck prevails. The Green Hornet crash, the rescue from the sea, and the aftermath of the war are all examples of lucky and unlucky instances that Louie Zamperini faced that left him “unbroken”.

The scoring of the ABAS-II was also conducted by Mr. Jones’ counselor whom meets the qualifications for the scoring and interpreting. The ABAS-II has several subsections including communication, community use, functional academics, home living, health and safety, leisure, self-care, self-direction, social, and work. These raw scores were converted to scale scored and broken down according to the manual to the following sections: general adaptive composite (GAC), conceptual (CON), social (SO), and practical (PR).

The speaker’s delivery was good, they were so nice and socialized. They were all standing and walking around the class room when they were giving the speech, they were asking audience questions, discussions and everybody contributed in the class room, they speakers were not loud, their voice was good for audiences, they were speaking slowly so that everybody can understand, they used their hands to explain things and also read PowerPoint to audience, Yes speakers were natural, at ease, direct and communicative which make the speech interesting and understandable to audience. Speakers were organized and they were not using terms that audience may not understand and they were not just repeating one thing. Speech was really going smoothly. Yes there was introduction, which is how everybody generally has their own primary love languages for receiving love and giving love, Body was to known the love languages such as words of Affirmation, Quality time, Receiving Gifts, Acts of service and Physical touch and conclusion was knowing the love languages is powerful, but knowing how they work in your relationships that is the game changer.

My visual aid was the strongest part about my speech. I brought in the ingredients to make Tiramisu to show which brands I like to use for the recipe. I also prepared Tiramisu for the class as my hold interest technique. To relate the topic to the audience, I told them that they could make this recipe when they want to impress someone. My credibility was also convincing as I informed the class I had researched and compiled the best recipe. My introduction in general was concise and convinced the audience pay attention to the rest of my speech. I also thought my tone was conversational and not too formal.

The speaker did a very good job with his speech. His speech I believe is more informative, because he is describing his recent experience with appendicitis. The area that I liked most about his speech was his introduction. He had a very good hooked that got a lot of people’s attention including my own. He scared me for a moment, because he made everybody believe that he was going to show everybody his appendix that he just had removed from his body. Instead he showed the appendix of a book. Also, as he presented his speech he expressed what happened to him with very personal information. This information helped him establish his credibility. He presented his speech very well and sounded very confident. However, there were a few brief pauses

Overall, I thought that this conference was well presented to us and it had very interesting stuff that I didn’t even know before. I also thought that our speaker was very passionate about the subject which was a good thing and a bad thing at times during

Overall I think are presentation was good the reason why I think that is. Are presentation was about the apollo missions one through eleven and what each objective was for each mission. Each mission was an important role for nasa because they learned many things like the mistakes they made and the new things they discovered throughout the missions. It's fascinating how much they were able to achieve in a short period of time.

The main points were clear, with the transitions feeling a bit lacking. She spent an equal amount of time on the body paragraphs but they were way too short, as the full speech fell a minute behind the minimum required presentation time. The was no slang, but there were some grammar and syntax issues, which are not completely the fault of the speaker, but are the fault of subject-verb agreement in native language. I would be lucky to do so well in a second language. She used effective imagery with her rhetorical questions, but could have done better imagery application with the soft information.

The speaker made direct eye contact at all times unless his head was moving to place emphasis on what he was saying. Further, the speaker spoke loud enough to be heard and did not require me to turn my volume up super high while struggling to hear him. Additionally, the speaker utilized a good pace. He moved slow enough for me to comprehend everything he was telling me but fast enough so that I did not get bored and distracted. Finally, the speaker alternated his pitch throughout the speech which kept my attention. Overall, besides the previously addressed issues, the delivery of the speech was great! I would, however, suggest having more time of the speech spent face to face with the speaker for a more powerful speech.

He gave clear information and was able to show the audience exactly how important it was to learn about their health. He seemed to very passionate about his subject because he was a doctor that understood everything. If I had to rate him on his presentation with a grade, I would give him a letter grade of a B-. The reason for the grade is because though he had solid information, he needed to more active throughout the full presentation. He needed to keep the life from draining in the audience. He gave a good quality speech for the most part. I would recommend him only if he keeps the audience engaged in the presentation. He has to be able to keep everyone’s attention in order for presentation to be a full

The native american presentation that happened in class was quite informative. The things that one might learne were quite interesting. For example, the stereotype slide was informative. One seeing the peter pan part may be genuinely confused as to if they were singing or worshiping Cthulhu. Another part that was informative was the video about the treaties. The original treaty, the Two Row Wampum belt, was particularly interesting because it is a treaty and symbolic. The Iroquois confederacy segment was equally fascinating, as it explains a possible origin of democracy in America. Those are some of the many pieces of information in the native american slideshow.

The feedback I received was varied. The planning, structure and content of the presentation was good and well structured. Based on this feedback I was happy with the flow and how the presentation came across from this perspective. As a result I don’t think I would change how I went about creating the presentation. I do a lot of planning and project work as part of my day to day job so structuring it I found quite

The Exhibition went as smoothly as I wished it had gone, people were enjoying the animation as well as reading through the website and posters to give themselves more information about it. I had compliments from all ages who said they enjoyed my animation and the concept was excellently put together in an artistic way while also showing reality. I had people telling me that I did extremely well to show the topic in an interactive yet sensitive way which stood out for them and they all appreciated my