ACEDS Case Summary

The specific issues to consider would be how CES broke its ruling by not offering a hearing as it previewed for the school officials to notify the parent before an automatic suspension. The board of CES was supposed to hold a full hearing for the third offense to find out if the student is guilty before expulsion, arrest, incarceration for 30 days or confiscating the student's phone permanently. Congress may transfer the authority to create substantive rules that are compatible and in the scope of its statute. CES had a secluded requirement in the statute that allowed their officials to target principally female students because allegedly females talk on the phones than males. CES did not obtain Congressional delegation to target mostly female

The OIG provided the PA 600 application for benefits (Exhibit C-1) as verification that the Individual applied for SNAP benefits and was aware of the rights and responsibilities as a SNAP recipient. Also, the PA 600 showed that the Individual was advised of the prohibitions and penalties for violation. The OIG’s witness, IMCW TL also corroborated

The Department’s Representative contends that the household was receiving benefits and was due for renewal. The household consisted of the Appellant’s husband who is receiving Home and Community Based Service benefits under the MA program and the Appellant was receiving State payment of her Medicare Part B Premium. The Appellant’s total monthly income was Social Security benefits in the amount of $855.00 and a monthly annuity in the amount of $66.00, totaling $921.00. The Appellant’s spouse received income of $767.00 from Social Security benefits. The total household income was combined

Benefits: Ms. Williams’ Public Assistance case is open and active. Ms. Williams is still receiving $389.00 in cash assistance and $355.00 in food stamps.

On August 19, 2013, the Department of Human Services, Office of Program Review, Monitoring and Investigation (OPRMI), Fraud Investigations Division received a hotline compliant alleging that District of Colubia (DC) benefit recipient, Joseph Jackson (Mr. Jackson) was employed by Jiffy Lube in Arlington, Virginia and had not reported his employment.

I sent the forms to the member on 06/06/2016 as per request but she doesn’t want to fill them out. She went to the Medicaid office (115 Chrystie St., NY, NY 10002) on Wednesday June 8,2016 and they informed that her case is being handle and not further documentation is needed. Medicaid Office gave this case # 0237738221E. That’s the reason why she doesn’t want to fill out further documentation.

On 1/5/2016, she had an appointment with Mr. Jose Diaz/WPA Law Project for SSI interview and assessment for SSI entitlement. Client reported base on Mr. Diaz assessment she doesn’t have a strong case to qualify for SSI and he dropped the case. Client continues to say Mr. Diaz recommended the client to see her PCP and continues to take all medical referral to have a stronger case. Client reported this is the 3rd SSI lawyer that dropped her case.

Client and this CM was able to complete all three forms. Client stated to this CM working on Friday at 12PM to Monday at 12PM each week as home health aide in New Canaan for an 89-year-old women. Client expressed happiness to be employed. Client stated being homeless since June of 2016 when due to getting kicked out of father's household. Client stated needing help to get housed is the reason for requesting case management services. Client stated to this CM being kicked out of father's house was due to drug usages. Client is currently receiving $383 monthly from SNAP and make roughly $1890 monthly from job. Client stated to this CM utilizing the Day Street Clinic in Norwalk CT as a primary care provider. Client also stated to this CM receiving therapy from Rebecca at Day Street Clinic for pass history of trauma. Client stated to this CM being raped three years ago and have a history of sexual abuse. Client stated to this CM medical history contains heart murmur. Client currently is taking 500mg of trazadone nightly. Client is diagnosed with depression and bipolar disorder. Client stated to this CM having 8 children, 6 biological and 2 adopted. Client family history contains depression and high blood pressure. Client scored 8 on the CAGE Assessment and scored 15 on the Modified

SC completed monitoring telephone call with Pa on 1/20/2016. SC called Pa. Pa reported that ding “good”. Pa reported no new health problems, no medications, no falls, and no hospitalizations. Pa reported no outstanding doctor’s visits. Pa reported that’s he saw her PCP on 1/19/2016. SC reviewed Pa's ISP. Pa confirms that she is receiving services in the following type, scope, amount, frequency and duration of services specified in the ISP agency model aide via Total Home Health Care from 10-2PM, Monday through Sunday. Pa's aide provides assists her with the completion of ADLs, IALDs and supervision as needed. Pa has PERS system which gives her access to emergency medical service. Pa also, receives HMD from PCA weekly. She reported being satisfied

RESOURCE UPDATE: Client reported she is has an open PA case and her daughters are still on her case. Cash $ 389.00/Cash and Food Stamps $ 324.00. Client reported she went to HRA to take her daughter of her budget and she mentioned to HRA representative that her daughters are no longer residing in her. CM advises the client to go back to HRA and to take her daughters off the case. CM provided client with a Residency Letter and metro cards.

Under Arkansas case law pertinent to actual fraud, Is Mr. Sidewinder liable for fraudulent misrepresentation, when (1) the sword which was solicited as authentic turned out to be a replica; (2) the defendant characterized the sword as what he personally believed to be true; (3) the plaintiff was given the opportunity to inspect the sword before the sale was induced; (4) the plaintiff relied on the statements of the seller, believing him to have peculiar knowledge in the field, and purchased the sword before examining it herself; (5) the plaintiff bought the sword for $50,000 when it was only appraised to a value of $1,000?

Mission: To efficiently investigate SIPV (Suspected Intentional Program Violation) allegations of unreported income by DC Public Assistance Beneficiaries.

Ms ROBERTS, DESIRE M, Case GB9071, expressed her concerns regarding an unmet copay from September of 2014. Her case has not been resolved yet. She said that she went to the SSP, Albany Branch to apply for ERDC, but she was told would not qualify for ERDC due to unmet copay. She said her husband and she are working and need ERDC. Ms Roberts stated that she has been sent back and forth between SSP, Albany Branch and DPU due to an unmet copay from September 2014.

He said that he was a CPA and he knows how to present and create a spreadsheet with all detailed information about his medical bills to be considered in his SNAP benefits. He said that he presented and emailed all his medical bills and the worker is not willing to process them.

Given the complexity and discretionary role of choosing the discount rate for pensions under SFAS No. 87, the planning procedures are essential to ensuring enough evidence is obtained by auditors. Four steps in the audit plan are of utmost importance — (1) assessing business risks, (2) establishing materiality, and (3) assessing the need for specialists. GM was consistently faced with large pension expenses due to their generous pension plans. Consequently, an audit team would need to analyze the pension account with high scrutiny because of its potential to affect the financial position of GM. In addition, materiality needs to be established on the amount of misstatement involved in the account because it provides a steadfast measure of error for the team to use in throughout the audit.