ADR - geneva convention

The agreement reached in the process of settlement of the proceedings awarded the penalty setting precedence by the name of ASIC

f. No preconditions for an award allowed nor may they get used as prizes in

The Geneva Conventions are a set of rules ,for countries that have taken part in the conventions, to conduct war by. They state how soldiers, sailors, POW’s, and civilians are to be treated during times of war between two opposing states or countries. They also show what is required to have the Conventions apply to each person. In the article “The President Is Not Bound by the Geneva Conventions in Dealing with Terrorists” by Jay Bybee, a united states appeals court judge, he talks about how terrorists should be treated under the rules of the Geneva Conventions. Bybee makes a point to say that terrorist groups like al-Qaeda are not a state so therefore the conventions do not apply to them.

Facts of the case (Summary of facts of case and its journey to Supreme Court)

The matter was presented to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) and AAT has different views on this matter and AAT considered the historical Cases and

Kolkey, D. M., Chernick, R., & Neal, B. R. (2012). Practitioners handbook on international arbitration and mediation (3rd ed.). Huntington: JurisNet.

The Court was hearing an appeal by the CCI against the order dated Feb. 15, 2010 of the Tribunal in Steel Authority of India Ltd. v. Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. Jindal Steel had

Finally, based on common law, the principle of comity and equity may oblige the courts to recognize foreign arbitral award, regardless where the arbitration was seated. The US Courts

Include name of parties in the case at the Court of first instance and Appellate Courts and name of Trial and Appellate judges.

this essay I will attempt to examine and analyse the effectiveness of international courts and

The recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in the United States can be a quite confusing and complex matter. To begin with, every judgment from another state that is not from the one in which enforcement is sought in, is considered a “foreign judgment” regardless of whether the judgment is from another state within the United States or a foreign country. Luckily for foreign judgments from sister states, the Full Faith and Credit Clause of Article IV, Section 1 of the United States Constitution applies. Judgment creditors for foreign country money judgments, however, are not so lucky because they cannot benefit from the Full Faith and Credit Clause. Furthermore, the United States has not ratified any international

One of the foundations of arbitration is that awards rendered are final and not subject to appeal before the courts. In this respect, Article 5 of the UNCITRAL Model Law provides for minimal intervention, and says, “In matters governed by this Law, no court shall intervene except where so provided in this Law“. As a result, the grounds upon which a court may set aside an award or refuse to recognize and enforce the same are limited. Article 34 of the Model Law and Article V of the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards provide the restrictive grounds for such relief.

This is a kind of justice which we in India are trying to realize through the process of law and our substantive law is being ,geared to this task."

Chief Justice M. Hameedullah Beg., Justice N. L. Untwalia, Justice P. N. Bhagwati, Justice P. S. Kailasam, Justice S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, Justice V. R. Krishna Iyer and Justice Y. V. Chandrachud.

Firstly, the choice of law applicable to the substance of the dispute which the parties have made can be either express or implied and if such choice took place the arbitrators have to apply it. Without any indications concerning choice of applicable law, an arbitral tribunal has to determine such law through the searching of proper