AP US essay

In a time when the Native Americans were building complex structures and had control of all of the Americas, the Spanish arrived, and took control from the natives conquering the Americas and leaving behind their influence until 1680. Also in a time when new colonists are arriving from England to America to form settlements, and settlers begin to reconsider their traditions. It is in this context that the Spanish and New England colonists are compared and contrasted. The Spanish and New England colonies from 1492 to 1700 were significantly similar in terms of treatment of indigenous people and considerably different in control of religion and control of European government.

This section highlights that history has created a false narrative depicting the natives as a victimized people, which they were to some extent but only in the fashion that they did not possess the same technology for warfare, immunity of communal diseases transmitted, and they were not anticipating combat. All other factors considered, the natives stood to be a potential threat. In regards to knowledge obtained by Spaniards prior to arrival and knowledge gained from observation, it would be remiss had they not prepared for battle. This argument is not to be misconstrued in approving their actions; I do recognize colonization as an evil for both the reasons employed and its damaging effects, but rather to change the narrative surrounding that of the native people. While they did experience a tragedy, I feel that it is erroneous to write them into history as being incompetent resulting from their

It is important to develop a clear thesis on the validity of the statement at the outset of the essay. A good essay could be developed on either side of the issue or in support of a middle-of –the-road position. Supporting paragraphs should be developed to build the position chosen. Both the Spanish and the English treated the Native Americans as inferiors, thought it important to bring them Christianity, sought to profit economically from relations with the Native Americans, and

The relationship between the English and the Native Americans in 1600 to 1700 is one of the most fluctuating and the most profound relationships in American history. On the one side of the picture, the harmony between Wampanoag and Puritans even inspires them to celebrate “first Thanksgiving”; while, by contrast, the conflicts between the Pequots and the English urge them to antagonize each other, and even wage a war. In addition, the mystery of why the European settlers, including English, become the dominant power in American world, instead of the indigenous people, or Indians, can be solved from the examination of the relationship. In a variety of ways, the relationship drastically alters how people think about and relate to the aborigines. Politically, the relationship changes to establish the supremacy of the English; the English intends to obtain the land and rules over it. Socially, the relationship changes to present the majority of the English settlers; the dominating population is mostly the English settlers. Economically, the relationship changes to obtain the benefit of the English settlers; they gain profit from the massive resource in America. Therefore, the relationship does, in fact, change to foreshadow the discordance of the two groups of people.

In the early 1800’s, The United States and Spain had continuously argued with the Native people. The Louisiana Territory was purchased from France in the year 1803, Americans continued to push farther west for fertile land that could be used for farming. Due to overcrowding of eastern cities like New York City and Boston many settlers moved out west for a new start. It allowed for colonists to spread out and own untouched fertile land. When white settlers arrived they had realized that most of the land acquired from the territory was occupied by Native Americans for thousands of years. For decades Americans had thought that the land west of the Appalachian Mountains were unoccupied, but they were wrong. There were many tribes that had occupied this land. This included tribes like, The Choctaw, Cherokee, and The Chickasaw. In a sense, Americans had violent outbreaks with the Natives the minute the colonists’ had arrived in the United State. As the colonists’ tried to establish complete dominance and superiority over the Indians, ongoing heated debates over land ownership, and demanding requests to satisfy greed made forceful attacks between the groups unavoidable.

Looking throughout the overwhelming events the American Revolution had on everyone involved, allows us to examine how the governments’ policies toward the Indians changed over time. It shows how the policy changes effected the Indians as well as the Americans’, their attitudes toward each other as the American’s pushed westward and the Indians resisted. Then the actions on both sides which lead up to the final removal of all Indians to west of the Mississippi in 1830’s.

Supporting Argument 2 A. Topic: The British settlers were more numerous than the Spanish colonies, outnumbering them five to one by 1750. a. Evidence 1: By the time of the American Revolution, some 90 percent or more of these colonies were Europeans. (p.634) b. Evidence 2: Disease and highly aggressive military policy had largely cleared the colonies of Native Americans, and their number did not increase as it did in the land of Aztecs and Incas. (p.634) IV. Supporting Argument 3 A. Topic: British settler colonies evolved traditions of local self-government more extensively than in Latin America, which was governed by Spanish

In the pamphlets “The Crisis” and “The Word and the Silence” Thomas Paine and Subcomandante Marcos formulated arguments based on the struggle between oppressive regimes and the commoners suffering it. Their purpose was to influence a justification to revolt in the common people as well as to establish how they needed to fight the oppression. The rhetorical devices used by Thomas Paine and Marcos can be compared in the sense that they both display anaphora, loaded language, and a credibility ethos to create an emotional, and inspiring tone to help their audience embrace revolt in a positive way. After coming to these conclusions, I was able to extrapolate a new insight on

The Puebloans that remained after Spanish colonization of their homeland, New Mexico, in 1598 submitted to the Encomienda system without being aware of how much it would demand. The Spanish obscurely informed the Puebloans that they would protect them from bordering tribes such as the Apache and Navajo in exchange for labor and supplies. That seemed possible for the Puebloans, but the Spanish should not have been so misleading. What the Puebloans soon find out is that the not so friendly Spanish want unconditional servitude and to hand over supplies when requested.

The Pueblo revolt of 1680 caused major setbacks for the Spanish empire in Mexico, counteracting years of “progress” and wasted money and resources. However,

Not every man needs a prescription level drug solution to address Erectile Dysfunction (ED) or male impotence. A combination of several powerful natural herbs and supplements such as those found in natural male enhancement pills can be a perfect solution in many cases for male impotence and Erectile Dysfunction sufferers. What makes male enhancement pills and products so effective? The specially formulated ingredients of male enhancers and their consistent effects for Erectile Dysfunction and male impotence sufferers are what have made them the best Male Enhancement product alternative to prescription drugs. And, unlike many prescription drugs that treat Erectile Dysfunction, the herbal male enhancement products are natural, fast acting,

The conquistadors ventured to the America’s in approximately the 1500s. During the process of settlement the conquistadors, led by Hernan Cortez encountered numerous natives who originally inhabited the land. When two unfamiliar civilizations encounter each other the end result can be unpredictable. Each human being has an unique thought process. Therefore numerous spaniards viewed the native americans as a peaceful, and kind civilization, while on the other side of the bridge, several spaniards like Hernan Cortez viewed the indians as a threat to their wellbeing. However, Bartolome de las Casas viewed the native Indians in a different manner. Bartolome de las Casas viewed the natives as a genuinely kind civilization, therefore the people

Hi: I'm Christopher, thanks for checking out my profile. In this section I'll provide some additional information, to clarify compatibility. And if you think, feel we are companionable I look forward to conversing about your perspectives, and expectations.

Both of these articles discuss Spain's intentions and actions with the conquest of the New World. The first article focuses on how the Spaniards caused a genocide of Native Americans when they first came to the New World. It focuses on Columbus is grieve for riches in the New World and how he looked down upon the new Americans because of their quick generosity and lack of understanding of who the spaniards were. The author also touches on the English is cruelty towards Native Americans and how they battled with them for Lent and push them farther and farther across the North American continent. The second article is about how the Spaniards were propagandized by other countries in Europe to sound more vicious and murderous than they actually

The Spanish had several motives that added to the conflict. One of which was dealing with the Indians. According to the “Requirement” article, the impact