APRN Role

In the Texas, state law prohibits Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) including nurse practitioners (NPs) from practicing to the full extent of their education and clinical ability. Currently, Texas law requires than an APRN receive approval from an individual physician prior to engaging in the practice of advanced nursing. This type of complex regulatory scheme is outdated and restricts patients’ access to care, creates geographic disparities in services, and unnecessarily increases health care costs. For example, current law requires APRNs to meet periodically face-to-face with a supervising physician; with few physicians choosing to practice in rural areas, many APRNs who are willing to work in rural areas are essentially forbidden from delivering care to these underserved areas.

First, the state licensure regulates NP practice and it has been a big issue since NPs are not able to practice to the fullest extent despite of their education and training. NPs practice is regulated by state licensure and only about one-third of the nation has adopted full practice authority licensure and practice laws for NPs (Hain & Fleck, 2014). The American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) reports that, under a full practice authority model, NPs are still required to meet

This paper explores the perception of clinical practitioners to the change in policy related to the advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) full practice authority. The author conducts a one-on-one, open-ended interview of 5 nurse practitioners and 5 physicians licensed to practice in Maryland on their perceptions of the recent passage of the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse Full Practice Authority. A literature review was conducted in a policy report by the professional nursing organization, and discussion within the peer-reviewed article supported an overview, regulatory differences among 50 states, including the District of Columbia. Their policy implication for enhancing APRNs role nationally. The author discusses a critical component

Insurers are less likely to reimburse APRN’s in states that mandate physician supervision. Nurses need to push for reform of the regulations governing APRN;s.

The Full Practice Authority for APRNs (HB 1415/ SB 681) deals with the legislation which will permit Nurse Practitioners (NPs) to practice to the complete magnitude of their education and training. It will also eliminate expensive and difficult regulatory requirements like having contracted delegation arrangements with physicians, and will place NPs under the select supervisory authority of the Texas Board of Nursing (BON). Bill HB 1415 was filed on 02/01/2017 and was “Left pending in committee” as of 04/25/2017. Bill HB 681 was filed on 01/31/2017 and was “Referred to Health and Human Services” as of

With the passing of the Affordable Care Act in 2010 approximately 32 million more people will be insured throughout the United States. The need for healthcare workers and providers will be in drastic demand to provide care to these insured Americans. The 2010 IOM report details out how the advanced practice nurse can be a valuable asset in primary, chronic and transitional care and their skill set should be used to promote better healthcare across the nation (IOM, 2010). This impact of this report should help progress advanced practice nurse’s ability to practice without individual state regulation and be governed under one body to server in and outside of the hospital setting

The Texas Nurses Association is a strong proponent of permitting APRN’s to practice with full authority using their clinical skills and education to their fullest potential (Cates, 2017, p. 2)l. The TNA is a member of the APRN Alliance, which encompasses four statewide associations (Cates, 2017, p. 2). The APRN Alliance joined forces with the Coalition for Health Care Access (CHCA). This coalition is comprised of “over 20 business, consumer-advocacy, and health care stakeholder groups” (Cusack, 2017, p. 2). Currently, APRN’s barriers include expenses associated with partnering physicians (Holmes & Kinsey-Weathers, 2016). Granting APRN’s full practice authority would results in a monetary loss to these physicians. The AMA and AAFP oppose the passing of HB 1415 (Hooker & Muchow, 2015, p. 89). The pushback from these organizations stands regardless of strong evidence of the positive outcomes with allowing APRN’s full practice authority.

Advanced practice nurse practitioners (APRNs) have been attempting for many years to eliminate barriers that prevent full practice authority nationwide. Each state has its own licensure and regulates APRN practice roles. APRNs benefit health care by addressing two pertinent needs: the lack of available physicians; and, the increase in patient comorbidities (Gray, 2016). Florida is about to experience a shortage of medical practitioners. According to the Physician Workforce Annual Report of 2014, statistics state 13.4% of medical providers are expected to retire within the following five years after 2014 due to an increase

Hi Swanthi, great post on the APN Consensus Model. In your post you mentioned many healthcare organizations had “criticized the inconsistencies in APRN practice and brought up concerns of patient safety issues due to these competency irregularities.” Although this model was developed in 2008, there are still many regulations and unclear terms that need to be clarify. I can see for nurses that are just beginning their APRN education will be able to eventually achieve the same licensure, accreditation, credentials, and education (LACE), but what about those are currently practicing now? If I was the APRN that had to take extra courses to be licensed in my state than I would feel a bit dissatisfied when another APRN from another state that required

According to reports found on the web page MEDPAGETODAY (2014) there has been an increase in the independent practice for advanced practice registered nurses (APRN). The article quotes data from the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) which reports 17 states and the District of Columbia allowing “full practice” with this meaning the APRN evaluates, diagnoses, orders testing, prescribes medication and initiates and manages treatments. 21 states require “collaborative agreement” with a physician and 12 requiring supervision of a physician. Collaborative agreement scope of practice varies by state and institution of employment.

Defining the scope of practice for an advanced practice nurse (APRN) can be a difficult task. Currently, in the United States, each state has its own policies regarding APRN scope of practice. State policies/laws vary from restrictive to independent. States under a restrictive policy of APRN scope of practice may have strict physician collaboration regulations. For example Missouri requires the collaborating physician to review a percentage of charts and be within so many miles of the APRN’s work place. Restrictive scope of practice can also limit prescriptive authority and decrease reimbursement of services (Hain & Fleck, 2014). States with more independent scope of

Whether the changes are related to evidenced-based practice or laws related to practice, the nursing field is constantly evolving. Although APRNs are heading in a great direction, there are still many limitations to their practice. As shown in Barton Associates’ (2015) law guide, there is a trend in the chart that shows more restrictions placed on NPs the farther southeast one works. Considering I live in South Carolina, I witness these restrictions first hand. However, to our advantage, South Carolina has a lot of influence from the military community considering it’s high population of military personnel. “The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is proposing to amend its medical regulations to permit full practice authority of all VA advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) when they are acting within the scope of their VA employment” (Department of Veterans Affairs, 2016). Therefore, APRNs will be able to practice independently within the VA system, regardless of the state’s rules and regulations. I am looking forward to the changes this will bring within the next few years. I believe this will help motivate states to relieve some, if not all, of the restrictions placed on APRNs as they see more efficient use of healthcare resources in the VA system in every

Expanding the scope of practice for APRN remains a controversial issue in Missouri, where I currently reside. Expanding the scope of practice also remains an issue for the health care field nationwide. Stakeholders that I can identify include The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN), The National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF), APRN Consensus Work Group, National Council State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN), APRN Advisory Committee, along with other health care organizations, health care educators, and health care providers nationwide (IOM Report., n.d., p. 133). Focusing in on Missouri, the stakeholders for this endeavor include health care

As resistant as some states’ legislative and regulatory bodies are to grant APNs autonomy of practice, the damage being done by over-regulation is clear (Safriet, 1992). Physicians are forced into a position to either supervise the APN’s practice or be constantly consulted for approval of their practice decisions. Safriet (1992) described that in and of itself, this constant supervision may appear to patients that the APN is not competent to provide adequate or care equivalent to that of a physician. If the role of the APN is to bridge gaps in health care by relieving the medical establishment of some of the patient load by performing the same function as a physician in a primary care setting, it seems wholly unnecessary to restrain their scope of practice in those areas. This type of restrictions affect cost and patient care accessibility (Safriet, 1992). This was a problem stated in the article, however 25 years later, populations of patients remain unseen or cared for and APNs continue to be underutilized (Safriet, 1992). Rigolosi and Salmond (2014) cite the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) when they state that not utilizing nurse practitioners due to practice restrictions costs $9 billion annually in the US (p. 649).

As the healthcare system in America is overhauled, advanced practice nurses are going to increasingly assume the role of primary care providers. Many states have kept up with the evolving expansion of