ARS/WBE Report Sample

(Exhibit 3). Having received no response since March 8, 2017, on March 20, 2017, Counsel for State Farm sent Arnold a letter: 1) reminding her of her outstanding discovery requests; 2) indicating that we had not yet received her outstanding discovery requests; and 3) requesting that Arnold provide her discovery responses within five days of the date of the letter. (Exhibit 4, March 20, 2017, letter from Green). To date, despite repeated requests, State Farm has not received Arnold’s Answers to Interrogatories, and the docket entries for this matter do not show that the same have been served. (Exhibit 2).

As is all too often the case, a payment dispute accompanied the conclusion of this substantial construction project. In early 2007, Metropolitan refused to pay WCS several million dollars due for the labor and materials furnished to the project. (E. 917). As such, WCS filed a complaint to establish a mechanic’s lien. (Id.). In consideration for WCS’s release of

DOI: 7/7/2015. The patient is a 48-year-old male cleaner who sustained a work-related injury to his back while moving a heavy bookcase. As per OMNI, the patient was diagnosed with lumbar degeneration, thoracic or lumbosacral neuritis and myofascial pain.

There are a number of parties in this case. I’ll refer to the main parties as the plaintiff and defendant

CONDITION: Auditors selected two ETA 9130s (cost reports) that were noted as delinquent in the Delinquent 9130 Quarter Ending September 30, 2014 report. For one of the two reports, revealed that an FPO did not review, analyze, and accept the grantee’s cost report until approximately four months after the grantee’s initial submission.

This report was then filtered for participant which exited and completed 4th quarter follow-up by 1/1/2015. The contractors’ then reconciled each list by location site name and transferred those records to the CRWP for archive. The during the reconciliation process, staff quickly learned that what was indicated on the report from the system of record did not always reflect the actual records that had closed, nor the site they original registered and received service from. To resolve this issue, the contractors’ manually developed list to indicate what folders they were sending from each site to CRWP for archive. Additionally, the AD/DW contractor had over 500 records, enclosed in 29 banker boxes, which were transferred from prior contractors that did not show –up on the original report or had completed follow-up before 2014. Due to time

from 2003 to 2013 made 81 improper payments through commissions to employees of foreign governments or their third-parties. These payments totaled over $9 million, and resulted in more than $34 million in profits. These commissions were approved by senior management at Celcat or Condel, but the real purpose of the payments were concealed from GCC’s executive management.

These are responses that the VC did not address when they submitted their documentation to Beyond Rewards , the company investigating the Formal Complaint EC to Vol. July 2017

Duties included the administration of basic contracts and delivery/task orders against Basic Ordering Agreements and Indefinite Quantity contracts which encompass the spectrum of contract types from firm fixed price, cost types and special provisions. Reviewed contracts to determine required administrative functions to include coordination with the PCO, Contracting Officers Representative, contractor and DFAS. Monitored contractor performance for compliance with applicable laws, delivery schedules, payment provisions, contract data reporting requirements, and other contractual requirements. Analyzed contract funds status reports including the review and resolution of excess funds, request and review audits, monitor electronic payment functions, and resolve conflicting expenditures. Issued contract modifications and performed final closeout of assigned contracts to include reconciliation of funds and accounting for Government-Furnished property. Reviewed different types of audit reports to included systems, incurred costs and CAS issues and resolved penalty and other DCAA findings. Thoroughly researched inspection and acceptance problem tracked to a delegation issue, resolution enabling contract closeout. Provided Contract Audit Follow-up support to Administrative Contracting Officer on estimating

The most significant problems in this case as far as Augat goes is their decision(s) pertaining to

Just to let you know that I just finish working with Lisa all the Dental advance payments from the Dover location.I did all the dental corrections that she told me and post all the money that was on sitting on unassigned . The process take us long to do it b/c was a lot of errors from PMG when they post the charges and the adjustments from 2015 dental visits. The good new is that the Dental Dover location is clean now. She will be calling me on Tuesday againg so can do the 4th street location. She said that we did two full pages of corrections for the Dover side and now she feel more

at 214, all the rights and obligations of the prior agreement—no “exceptions.” (E. 2267, 2269; Appellant’s Brief at p. 21). In this matter, the plain and unambiguous terms of the 2007 agreement—consistent with National Surety’s concessions to this effect—demonstrate that it was not “clearly and satisfactorily” intended to “fully extinguish[]” “all of the provisions of the earlier contract” so as to completely “discharge” the prior agreement. I.W. Berman Props., 276 Md. at 8; Clark, 286 Md. at 214; Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 279 cmt. a. Accordingly, National Surety’s position is ultimately implausible because: 1) the 2007 agreement expressly incorporates provisions of the AIA Contract; 2) the integrated provisions of the AIA Contract further incorporate the AIA Contract in its entirety; and 3) various other provisions that fall outside the scope of the 2007 agreement still governed the parties’ relationship. As such, the 2007 agreement was not a substitute

This week my goals were based on the critique of my SOAP Note HPI narrative by my professor, which her feedback gave me the opportunity to re-evaluate and focus on the organization of patient information and documentation findings. Patient documentation is crucial in a collaborative health professional setting, due to the written documentation must be clear and easy to use and understand by others. Therefore, I will continue to work on improving my ability to overcome my written communication skills weakness. In order to accomplish my goal, I asked my preceptor to give me some suggestions. Unfortunately, I have a tendency to work harder than I need and don’t ask for help, but I like to build trust and excellent work with my team by being a

In early 1987, L & A Construction Company started building a bridge in Apalachicola Florida. As the general contractor, L & A subcontracted concrete delivery to Southern Concrete Services. The subcontract required Southern Concrete to obtain a performance bond. Southern received the bond from Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, and started supplying the concrete that same year. According to the court, it is agreed “that Southern failed to provide sufficient concrete to L & A in a timely manner and breached the subcontract in numerous other particulars (L & A Contracting Company v. Southern Concrete Services, Inc., 1994).” L & A complained multiple times about Southern Concrete’s poor quality of concrete and the slow delivery rates. On May 29, 1987, L & A sent a letter to Southern Concrete and F & D informing them that Southern had breached the contract.

Chiquita made the payments through a wholly owned subsidiary, a Medellin, Columbia-based C.I Bananos de Exportacion S.A., known as “Banadex,” which by 2003 was the company’s most profitable operation…Chiquita, through Banadex, paid the AUC nearly every month, ultimately making more than 100 payments amounting to more than $1.7 million…payments were approved by senior executives of the corporation…Chiquita recorded the money as “security payments” or payments for “security” or “security services,” although it never received any security services in exchange for the