AT & TV Merger

If they are able to maintain the loyalty of most of their current customers, the companies will then have a shared amount of about 100 million customers. This potential customer volume for the merging companies would greatly outnumber the customer volume of the industry leaders, AT&T and Verizon. This kind of turnout would create greater competition between the two merging companies and the two leading companies (Sprint Wireless News, 2014). Although the outcomes seem promising for Sprint and T-Mobile, there are also potential negative effects of a merger that the companies should take into consideration. Current Sprint and T-Mobile customers have expressed their fear of the possible merger for multiple reasons. The two biggest worries for telecommunication services consumers is the potential for rising costs and a reduction in provider options (John, 2016). In making a final decision, the companies, as well as the Federal Communications Commission, should weigh the advantages and disadvantages of a

In 1984, Southwestern Bell Corporation was born. Major changes in the competitive landscape that occurred due to the Telecommunications Act in 1996 caused Southwestern Bell to acquire Pacific Telesis Group and Ameritech Corp. Later on in 2005, Southwestern Bell acquired AT&T Corporation, creating the new and improved AT&T, which would become the leader in global business communications. In 2006, the company obtained ownership of Cingular Wireless. Shortly after that, AT&T led a major transformation in the communications industry by introducing the mobile internet. To this day, AT&T continues to be very successful. In 2013, the company bought Cricket to provide more access to mobile internet to customers in the prepaid market. In 2015, they purchased two Mexican wireless companies, Iusacell and Nextel. Later that year they acquired DIRECTV which made them the world’s largest TV provider. Their pending purchase of Time Warner Inc.

According to the researchers the increased value results from an opportunity to utilize a specialized resources which arises solely as a result of the merger (Jensens & Ruback, 1983; Bradle, Desai and Kim , 1983). For creating operational and financial synergies managers believe that two enterprises will be worth more if merged than if operates as two separate entities. Thus, the two companies, A and B:

However, a stock drop in the U.S. market is not historically unusual for impending mergers. So, all things considered, it looked like this might be a great combination.

To summarize, AT&T has a very organized management team that is always planning new things for the company’s well being. The AT&T managers believe in happy employees and happy customers. The company offers great employee benefits and salaries and by doing this they keep the employees working for the company a longer length of time. AT&T realizes that the longer the employees are with the company the more educated they are about the products and services and about company regulations. In turn AT&T spends less money training new employees because the employees that are with the company stay with the company as long as possible. AT&T also manages to keep long lasting relationships with the customers with different things like bundles and by introducing

Merging with another organization has downfalls of destroying wealth from the merger. Considering the buying price is important when merging, spending too much on the merger will impound the value after the merger. Some mergers do not create wealth so capital is lost through the merger. There is no guarantee of financial gain and every formula considered with focus, just as with an acquisition. The final decision dictated by the variables. One company merging with another company takes the debt and losses of those companies in the new formed company.

The grounds for any merger depend on the competitive nature of both firms. If one firm is highly competitive and tries to

Companies do not have the freedom to merge and acquire as they please do. All have to meet the requirements and essentially be approved by regulatory bodies. In the context of regulations, antitrust laws and security laws are commonly referred to by regulator to determine whether a merger or acquisition should be allowed or rejected. Antitrust laws prohibit mergers and acquisitions that impede competition. The point is very simple where antitrust is referred to as competition. The goal is to increase competition because more competition in economics means that consumers get more at a fairer or lower price. Anytime a regulator believes that a merger or acquisition will make an industry or market less competitive, the business transaction might

An account of the meeting told that Justice Department officials required AT&T to sell Turner Broadcasting, which will serve as a possible requirement for AT&T to clinch government approval. Another account claims that AT&T can sell off DirecTV, which the telecommunications giant has acquired for nearly $49 billion in 2015. However, AT&T and Time Warner shared a sentiment that such a concession

In a recent article by the Washington Post, Charter has recently acquired the rights to Time Warner Cable (TWC) in a $55 billion dollar deal (Kang). This comes a few weeks after Comcast, a close competitor withdrew it’s own merger deal after a potential. The article states that the merger between Charter and TWC creates a viable competitor to Comcast which currently has 40 percent of all broadband internet subscribers. With the merger the article states that the company New Charter, would have a 35 percent share of the current broadband market, compared to Comcast which would have had more than 50 percent.

This organization encourages the development of a comprehensive work environment where all employees are respected and can achieve at their fullest potential. AT&T has a very strong culture and their values are not only shared with management, but by all employees. While mergers are known to affect an organization’s culture, AT & T has proven success with at least three mergers. In October of 2004 AT&T completed a merger with Cingular to become AT&T wireless. In November of 2005, SBC and AT&T finalized their union and with that AT&T Corporation became AT&T Incorporated. The organization became the largest phone company in the United States when they acquired SBC, serving 13 states in the western and southwestern part of the U.S. Their latest acquisition came in Mar of 2006 when Bellsouth was purchased ("AT&T Inc." Notable Corporate Chronologies Online Version, 2006). With the merger of Bellsouth, AT&T picked up another nine states in the Southeast to provide available service in a total of 22 states (Reardon, 2006). The merger of AT&T and BellSouth, along with the consolidation of Cingular Wireless, will continue advancement in the communications and entertainment industry, where they will continue to invent new resolutions for consumers and businesses. These accomplishments prove that AT&T has a successful organizational culture.

Over the next four years, AT&T took action to succeed in changing the environment. It invested 35 billion dollars upgrades to its infrastructure. By mid –2000 AT&T had evolving networks- data, broadband and wireless. IN January 2005, AT&T bought SBC for 16 billion dollars and this created the industry’s premier communications and networking company. And just recently AT&T has merged with Cingular to created even more ties to what you like.

* AT&T should take advantage from slowing down in the merger activity and lower premiums. If negotiations take a long time, situation can reverse, driving the costs of acquisition up

AT&T was broken up into the Bell companies in “1974 by the U.S. Department of Justice antitrust suit against the monopoly” (From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia). Today AT&T has become a competitor vying for control of the telecommunications industry. “In monopolistic competition, there are many firms vying for control of one market. Each firm offers a different type of product, as opposed to perfect competition in which all offer the same product. Each firm, then, has a monopoly in the market of their own product”(Oracle ThinkQuest Education Foundation) AT&T in 1988 began purchasing stock in Sun Microsystems to begin its diversity in product services. Throughout the 90s AT&T continued purchasing more computer companies and cell phone companies to gain market share in the growing telecommunication industry (CyberStreet). Good pricing structures align with costs. AT&T Wireless realized that the marginal cost of a cellular minute was small compared to the cost of acquiring and maintaining customers. Their switch to a flat fee “One-Rate” plan was a huge success, stealing heavy users away from the competition. Prices increased for light users and many became hooked on the cellular lifestyle (Lake Partners Strategy Consultants, Inc. [LPSCI], 2001-2004). AT&T has seen that the ability to change quickly in the ever-evolving telecommunications market will help in gain market share. Its ability to see the value in keeping customers rather

This is a merger that creates market leadership. This is a merger that we can expect to be substantially accretive.