preview

Abolishing The Death Penalty

Better Essays
Open Document

"If you really want to kill someone, give them life without parole. It's worse than dying" (Steidl). Gordon Steidl, who lived on death row and in prison after being wrongfully convicted of murder, stated this after considering both sides of the argument about capital punishment due to first hand experience (Phillips). After its suspension in 1972, the modern death penalty was reinstituted in the United States in 1976 as it was deemed constitutional in three different cases, referred to collectively as the Gregg decision (Death Penalty Information Center). Since then, there has been massive debate over the subject of whether or not the death penalty should continue to be implemented. In fact, states have been executing fewer and fewer people …show more content…

Used almost exclusively for homicide cases, the death penalty takes killers and disciplines them by letting other people kill them; how can this be a proper and just punishment? The word humane is defined as showing compassion, benevolence, and kindness, thus making the term “humane execution” an impossible oxymoron, as in no way does execution display any of these values (Green). Killing people in capital punishment only makes us more like the murderers we so despise. Not only is capital punishment a horrific form of punishment for the victim, but its effects on those who perform the execution and those in whose name the execution is done are traumatic and unforgettable thoughts of guilt and sadness (Brook). It is bad enough that our society is plagued by crime, we don’t need to be further affected by becoming perpetrators ourselves by enacting the death penalty and living with the consequences (Brook). To add to capital punishment's inhumanity, it can sometimes even be deemed as discriminatory and unfair by being based on race and social class, as since 1976 the race of victims has been 75.6% white, and the race of defendants executed has been 34.5% black, which can be interpreted to favor the white race. (Race of Death Row Inmates Executed Since 1976.). The death penalty can also be seen as unconstitutional, due to its possible violation of the 8th amendment, stating that …show more content…

With all of the arguments against the death penalty, you would think that it’s still being implemented due to its effectiveness at inhibiting crime rates. However, this is not the case, as it has been heavily discredited and proved to not discourage crime rates at all (McElwee). According to “Death Penalty Information Center”, since 1990 there has actually been a higher rate of homicide in states with the death penalty than states without, and in 2015 there was a 25% higher rate of homicide in those death penalty states. This proves that in fact, the death penalty is so brutal on society, that when such violence is condoned via the death penalty, more violence is to follow (Brook). In addition, while one belief is that it is cheaper to kill the criminals instead of housing them, the overall costs of proceeding with the death penalty overtake those of its alternative; life imprisonment. Over the full extent of a case, executing prisoners can be up to three times as expensive as life in prison, due to factors like higher costs of capital punishment trials, automatic appeals, the long review process, and heightened security on death row (Brook). There is no need to fund a more expensive and inefficient means of punishment if there is a more humane and cost effective one available in life

Get Access