Slavery in America began during the early 17th century and followed with the abolitionist movement in the late 1800’s. This movement created a continental divide between southern and northern states. In the south, there are the Southern Democrats who supported the idea of slavery and believed that the institution was necessary for the survival of the south. Southern Democrats also argued that the North turned their back on the “real” America. While the northern states were composed of Republicans, such as Abraham Lincoln, whose efforts to exterminate slavery eventually caused the absorption of anti-slavery Whigs and most of the Know-Nothing party. In the years that followed, slavery fueled the fire that started the Civil War. The vast majority of southern states did not favor the abolishment of slavery in the 1850’s nor 1860’s. On the contrary, the states divided themselves of the increasing problem of slave versus free territories. The Compromise of 1820, also known as the Missouri Compromise, admitted Maine to the Union as a free-state in 1820 and Missouri as a slave state in 1821. In addition, the compromise prohibited the use of slavery in all parts of the Louisiana Purchase north of the …show more content…
The Compromises of 1820 and 1850 seemed to have slightly pacified the conflict, but the peace quickly dissipated. However, Stephen Douglas believed in popular sovereignty when he wrote the Kansas Nebraska Act. The act grew southern support because it repealed the Missouri Compromise and gave southerners the authority to bring slaves into Kansas. Although, the north saw the act as a way for the south to extend slavery just as they did with the Fugitive Slave Act. By mid-1850, the southern pro-slavery party and free-soil Whigs division could no longer be
In 1954, the Kansas- Nebraska Act was passed. Northern Democrat Steven Douglass in an attempt to build a transcontinental railroad petitioned the Kansas-Nebraska act on the bases that the Compromise of 1850 validated popular sovereignty. In Douglass’s opinion the Compromise of 1850 made the Missouri Compromise of 1820 void. There was opposition from Northern politicians who believed that the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was a sacred pact made by previous lawmakers during the union’s long history of compromises. For Southern politicians the Kansas- Nebraska Act would help the extension of slavery which most of the Northerners were against. Ignoring the wishes of the Northerners and pushing the Democratic agenda which wanted not only the
At the time, the United States contained twenty-two states, evenly divided between slave and free. In the years leading up to the Missouri Compromise of 1820, tensions began to rise between proslavery and antislavery factions within the U.S. Congress and across the country. They reached a boiling point after Missouri’s 1819 request for admission to the Union as a slave state, which threatened to upset the delicate balance between slave states and free states. To keep the peace, Congress came up with a two-part compromise, granting Missouri’s request but also admitting Maine as a free state. It also passed an amendment that drew an imaginary line across the former Louisiana Territory, establishing a boundary between free and slave regions that remained the law of the land until it was repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854.
territory. As northern settlers poured into Kansas, however, in 1861 it qualified for admission to the union as a state where slavery was illegal. So many Northerners were distraught over the Kansas-Nebraska Act that they founded a new, purely northern, purely anti-slavery political party. the 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act created the territories of Kansas and Nebraska, opened new lands, repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820, and allowed settlers in those territories to determine if they would allow slavery within their boundaries. The initial purpose of the Kansas-Nebraska Act was to create opportunities for a Transcontinental Railroad. It was not problematic until popular jurisdiction was written into the proposal. The act was designed by Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois. The act established that settlers could vote to decide whether to allow slavery, in the name of "popular sovereignty" or rule of the people. Douglas hoped it would ease relations in both North and South, because the South could expand slavery to new territories but the North still had the right to abolish slavery in their states. He was wrong; opponents denounced the law as a privilege to the slave power of the South. The new Republican Party, which was created in opposition to the act, aimed to stop the expansion of slavery, and soon emerged as the dominant force throughout the
The issue of slavery was left out of the Declaration of Independence for a reason, but why? We’ll also go over what the abolition of slavery is. We will find out whether abolition was present in the colonies during the American Revolution. And we will discuss how Lord Dunmore’s 1775 Proclamation influenced the Declaration of Independence. Those are the topics we will be covering today.
The Missouri Compromise was an effective temporally political compromise in reducing sectional tensions prior to the Civil War because it preserved a balance between the Northern and Southern states. In 1819, United States concluded with an equal number eleven slave and free states. However, settlers petitioned for Missouri as a slave state for its large population and became the first state to apply that was completely from the Louisiana purchase. Many opposed of Missouri as a free state due to the imbalance of states. This was resolved by admitting Missouri as a slave state and Maine
In the early 1800s, it appeared that these political battles could be decided with congressional compromises. Document A, also known as the Missouri Compromise, was created in 1820 to address the new state of Missouri. Whether or not Missouri was a slave state or free would be a watershed event, as from the onset it appeared one side would have more power in Congress. However, Henry Clay, one of the most famous congressmen of the time, was able to split up Massachusetts in order to create a new free state, Maine. With Maine being free, Missouri could join as a slave state, and both sides were appeased. However, no side was ever truly appeased, with Kansas-Nebraska act eventually repealing the Missouri compromise in 1854, only 34 years later. It is true that many more states were added into the union in those 34 years, such as Texas, California, and New Mexico. However, the Missouri compromise itself was not thought out for the long term, as it designated a single latitude line to divide the slave and free
The South seceding from the Union and the causes and effects of the secession have played a pivotal role in shaping the United States of America. The South seceding from the Union was caused by political, economic and social difference between the North and the South. These differences included the North and South having different views on slavery, states rights and politics. To this day, the United States is divided when it comes to issues such as politics, economics and race relations.
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 admitted Missouri as a slave state and balanced the number of slave states and free states by adding Maine as a free state. It also identified a line across the country that allowed slavery to the south and made slavery illegal to the north.
According to Henretta 2011 and U.S History, the Kansas-Nebraska act was a great political disaster for the political system of America, and was a strong, if not the leading, cause of the Civil War. Senator Stephen A. Douglas was behind said compromise. He wanted the territory known as Nebraska to decide whether or not it wanted to be a slave state, but, like mentioned before, the Missouri Act would be violated by such decision. Knowing this, Senator Douglas revised his bill and added that the Missouri Compromised should be repealed, and that popular sovereignty should decide the fate of the new territory, which would be formed as Nebraska and Kansas. When the Act was finally enacted, the disaster began. Northern Whigs and “anti-Nebraska” Democrats were enraged and opposed with passion to the act, denouncing it
In 1819, the House of Representatives had brought forth a bill with the idea of making Missouri a state. At this time, the Union consisted of eleven free states and eleven slave states. Once Missouri was established as a state, it upset the balance as Missouri would become a slave state, and there would be one more slave state than there would be free states. The southerners were happy about this decision while the Northerners feared this would lead to the extension on slavery in the north eventually. As a solution for all of the controversial arguments, the Missouri Compromise was made. In an effort to balance the amount of free states and the amount of slave states, in 1820, Maine was made a free states which in return allowed for Missouri to become a slave state. As well as balancing the number of free and slave states, the Missouri Compromise also denied slavery in the rest of the Louisiana Purchase, which was the boundary in the southern part of Missouri. Soon after this compromise had been made, Missouri decided to ban free blacks from the territory in which they obtained. Because of their decision to do this, the Union prohibited Missouri from joining until 1821, which was when a second Missouri compromise was made. The second Missouri Compromise forbid Missouri from inequity towards citizens coming from another state, yet left them the option to decide whether or not free blacks were considered to be citizens. Overall, the south took this as a victory over the
“Missouri would be admitted to the Union as a slave state, and Maine would be admitted as a free state, thereby maintaining the balance between slave and free states.” The Missouri Compromise held its promises which lasted for some decades until later on it become upended. Senator Stephen A. Douglas sponsored the Nebraska-Act which was to help build a railroad through Nebraska and Kansas which would enter the union as a free state. Later on Douglas went on to chose “popular sovereignty” which lead people to decide on which were slave or
Missouri Compromise: In order to maintain the balance between slave and free statehood, the Missouri Compromise temporarily dealt with several concerns. First, it admitted Missouri into the Union as a slave state, and Maine as a free state. It also established the Missouri Compromise Line on the southern border of Missouri, above which slavery was prohibited. However, this boundary would pose problems in the future, as the vast majority of the Louisiana Territory banned slavery.
The Compromise of 1820 was an attempt to halt the expansion of slavery. Maine was added as a state but with a prior ruling stating the number of slave states must equal the number of nonslave states, Missouri was admitted as slave state with the agreement that future states (bought during the Louisiana Purchase) north of the latitude marking Missouri’s southern border would be free, while all future states south of the latitude would be open to slavery. But the Missouri Compromise did little to resolve the answer of slavery. The KansasNebraska Act nullified the Missouri Compromise allowing the states to determine their slave status through popular sovereignty. The Missouri Compromise drew a specific line in the country which divided its
In 1819, Southern settlers in Missouri requested the federal government to allow the new state, Missouri, to be a slave state. Since Missouri was north of the existing border between slave and free states, the North was threatened by the northern expansion of slavery. If more states in the West would become slave states, then the South would overpower the North with its advantage of votes in Congress. In 1820, both sides adopted the Missouri Compromise. In this agreement, there would be no slavery north of latitude 36° 30', Missouri would become a slave state, and Maine would become a free state.
Southerners believes that if the United States could forbid slavery in Missouri, they could do so elsewhere. It 1820 congress finally agreed that slavery would be allowed in Missouri, but at the same time Maine would be carved out and admitted to the union as a free state. They also agreed that as the United States Expanded westward, states north of the 36 and a half degrees North would be free states, while states south of that would be slave states. This angered the north because under the compromise the new slave states covered more land than that of the new free states. Northerners worried that another slave state might increase the power of the southern states in the government.