Abortion - A Woman's Must Have the Right to choose
Abortion has been a long contested issue among Americans, and is one that nearly everyone holds an opinion on, myself being no exception. In my opinion, a woman's right to choose is imperative, important above all else. Like proven in Roe v. Wade, a woman's right to privacy - her right to choose whether or not to carry a child to term - is more important than the rights of the unborn.
Typical American rights - freedom of speech, rights to drive, vote, and drink, freedom to do and say what one wants - do not take effect until after an individual's birth. A fetus is not yet a human being; it is a mass of tissues and organs that has the potential to become a
…show more content…
Until the fetus exists apart from the mother - until it is born - it does not technically have rights.
The government has no place to put rights and limitations on a woman's body. In a free country, who other than the woman herself should have the moral and legal right to decide what she does with her own body? In conservative countries, especially in the Arab world, government and religion dictate these things. But the United States is much more socially advanced than these countries, or so we'd like to think. Who is the government - an often faceless, impersonal entity - to say what a woman can do to herself. Have the people that try to create these laws against abortion ever carried an unwanted child to term? Ever suffered the feeling of giving a child away? Chances are, they have not.
By disallowing abortion, a woman is sentenced to bearing a child against her will. This alone violates many of her own rights - her right to be happy, her right to be able to control the functions of her body, and perhaps even her right to life itself. By allowing abortions only in the cases of rape or incest or when the mother's life is at risk, a woman is denied these rights. She may choose to seek alternative forms of abortion, which may be harmful - or even deadly.
In all, the right to life cannot be denied. It is a sad
Women should not be able to make decisions about how to live their lives. Clearly, by the looks of the statistics, with approximately 42 million abortions a year, women are foolish. Women should not have the option of deciding when or whether to have children. They do this by making choices regarding when to have sexual intercourse and what contraceptive methods to use. The government should have all the power to make these decisions. Abortion reflects a women's value, her family, and her career.
Still, many people believe that women should not be given this right. They argue that the fetus growing inside her also has rights and that they should be protected.
Abortion for many years now has been a very controversial topic politically and culturally. Democrats are considered to be pro-choice for women rights to abortion, while the Republicans are against abortion due to their conservative culture. Women's right to have abortions have been violated by both state and federal government laws. Laws regulating women's right to an abortion is unconstitutional because the laws prohibits women from making their own decision whether or not to have an abortion performed. Women should have the right to an abortion with out any regulations by the state and federal governments because they may not be able to financial support the child or it may been an
The constitution does not specifically say anything on the topic which means that it all depends on the definition of human life, (what I have analyzed thus far), as related to the interpretation of the constitution. In the fifth amendment the constitution states that “No person shall… be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” So there is our answer right there, no person - the writers didn’t write an age limit there or a limit for developmental stage. But what about a woman having liberty to do what she wants with her body. Is that true? Absolutely! But science quite clearly shows that the embryos is not part of her body, so her rights should not override the rights of the unborn
Abortion is one of the most personal, widely discussed, and controversial topics in American culture today. In most cases, people on both sides of the argument take worthy and moral positions. Who can blame someone who wishes to prevent the termination of a teen pregnancy to save the life of an unborn child? On the other hand, who can blame anyone who advocates the soon-to-be mother's right to make such a personal, heartbreaking choice? No matter what she chooses to do, should anyone have the legal right to force her to bear an unwanted child? Most people in the US are pro-choice, and believe that abortion should be a legal, confidential decision that only a woman can make for herself. However, some are against the idea of
Proponents of punishing pregnant women, who put their fetuses at risk, have highlighted some pertinent legal and ethical issues. One is that a viable fetus (fetus after 27 weeks gestation) has certain rights and privileges. They are of the opinion that as soon as the fetus is viable and can survive independently from it mother, it becomes a
By arguing that the fetus has rights, it is implied that the fetus has a right to be in its mother?s womb regardless of her consent. This is obviously false, considering the mother has only let it be there by some form of her authorization. A fetus does not invade a woman?s body against her will, there was an act that the mother took part in, willingly or not, which allowed for a condition in which her egg was fertilized and began to mutate into a larger clump of her cells in her body and subsequently formed a fetus. If the fetus exists in a woman?s body only by her permission, how could we argue that it has a right to be there against her will? We can?t. It would be
Another argument in favor of abortions is the issue of freedom. If a woman chooses to end her pregnancy, she should have the freedom to do so. Taking away this freedom would be taking away a basic right. A fetus is part of a woman’s body and it would be illogical to restrict a woman’s choice to go through with the procedure. Moreover, the government and prolife activists should not try to regulate the practices of abortion; the fact of the matter is that an abortion is
Under the application of Federal Law and the U.S. Constitution it has been specifically addressed that a fetus has not been granted the rights and privileges of a person. The topic in itself is highly controversial with arguments originating on both sides of the discussion platform. Legal civil liberties have focused on the rights and privileges of the mother.
“Excessive restrictions stigmatize women seeking abortions and discriminate against those who lack the knowledge and understanding of legal grounds for abortion and vulnerable groups, such as poor and rural women and girls” (Finer). Abortion is commonly known as a murderous crime in which a mother chooses to terminate her child, but I do not view abortion that way. Abortion is when a mother determines that she is not capable to raise a child at the moment. I believe that tougher abortion laws should not be passed because it should be a women’s basic right to her own body, also, many women do not have the financial resources it takes to raise a child, and either way women will still seek illegal ways to get an abortion with risky outcomes
Even if a fetus is defined as a human being because it has a potential life, if the fetus does not yet aspire to live. It is impossible to argue that the fetus values its future yet, so why should it have a right to it?
Many would argue that a fetus is a potential person because it is has the potential to become what it is not yet. However, does a potential person have potential rights? An example was used: does a potential doctor have the rights of a licensed doctor? When one is describing potentiality, All he is really describing is what that thing is not. By declaring that a fetus is a potential person, one is also stating that a fetus is not a person. As one can see, this issue of the essence of a person and whether a fetus is a person is a very complicated one. This becomes seven more complicated if one takes into account the issue of rights. Now, the concept of human rights, that is to say, what American society dictates as human rights, conflicts heavily with itself. On one hand, we form a deep and heavy opinion on one’s right to life. On the other, we hold an equally strong opinion on one’s freedom to live that life as they please. American society by and large has a firm belief in an individuals right to live. Therefore, if one comes to the conclusion that a fetus actually is a person, then that fetus should receive the protection to it’s right to live, as much as you or I. This society also holds the firm belief in one’s right to the sovereignty of his or her own body, equal to that of one’s right to live. In this case, it is imperative that we understand what liberties we can and cannot take upon ourselves
When it comes to this decision it is possible for an individual support abortion on a political level but against it on a personal level. It all has to do with their morals and values that can come from religion, family, friends, knowledge and experience. Many Americans say, “Murder is wrong.” But what we have to think about the thousands of woman who end up pregnant as a result of rape or incest. The purpose of an abortion is to act as a life saver for both the mother and child. It has been estimated that before abortion was legal, about one million women per year had went through illegal abortions. Many of those women have died. To save a woman’s life, we must keep abortion legal.
The fetus cannot possibly have rights because the fetus cannot be determine as a complete human and no statics can back up 100% when human life begins without a doubt. We all assume we know but we don’t. It’s our own opinion; therefore, we cannot determine the laws and rights on our opinion but we can determine it on the fact that the mother is a human begin and has lived up the life. Besides the fetus depends on the mother at all time during the pregnancy and after birth. The mother is the one who is going to have to feed the child, clothes the child and change the child’s diapers. The child could not possibly do all of those things by itself; therefore, the child depends 100% at all times on the mother. That is why the mother deserves those rights and need safety procedures if she decides to
The right to a fetus is first shown through its growth, expressions, senses, and through its fundamental rights as a person.