Abortion Argument Essay

Currently, the use of research is to understand how the body develops from a fertilized egg and investigating how to produce more cells (Cox 1). However, there are limitations because of the uncertainty of how to fully control differentiation of these type of cells (Cox 1). Although they have solely been used for these specific expenditures, the problem still lies with “murdering” human lives. The people who support the embryonic stem cell research claim that the week-old blastocysts are only clusters of cells; therefore, they do not constitute as human beings (Rebecca 2). This is where they are wrong. They believe that because these cells, embryonic stem cells, are not “human”, they should not have the same human rights granted to the more advanced stages of cell growth. This is unjust because once the fetus starts to develop in the mother’s womb, it is a child with a life. The implementation of the embryo into the uterus wall around six days after fertilization counts as having life (Hug 1). Overall, embryos possess the same rights and are thus entitled to the same protections as are afforded to other human beings and in 2006, President Bush had ordered the limited funding of research involving human embryonic stem cells because of its violation of human rights (“Euro Stem Cell” 2). This demonstrates the seriousness of embryos having

An importance on what defines a human is very important. Is a human the result of sperm fertilizing an egg? At this point of fertilization the human is composed of a single cell with a unique DNA structure. Killing this unique cell would be wrong, however does

The creation of human life is an extraordinary system of cells combined to make a single individual, unique and beautiful. The only concern is closing the doors to a modern day holocaust. The nation might be blinded, but convincing others who are less human, do not have the same rights to life as you and I? Whether it is a zygote, blastocyst, embryo, or fetus it is still a human being no matter how far along in pregnancy the fetus has rights; evoking uprising controversy of fetal rights debates that have been working up through society, such as pro-life and pro-choice; a fetus is a person that has right just like a full-born human.

The real question regarding all of the varying opinions and controversy, is what is a human embryo, and what is human life? Other questions include the morality of embryonic stem cell research and is bearing children a right given to us by society? Further discussion of these question will entail why in

Personhood to me begins when the baby is starting to mature in the womb, then finishes when the baby is born. I feel the same way with when the embryo is an official human being, it starts in the womb and ends when the baby is born. I think an embryo is worthy of human rights is when it first develops, human rights develops with it. The time it grows from an embryo to a baby should be the same rate it gains rights, then when it's born, gets full-blown human rights. Protection of the law should given after some maturity in the womb. An unborn baby shouldn't be accused of a crime, that's ridiculous. The baby also shouldn't be under any danger such as in a violent act, it's just wrong if some stranger comes up and slaps a baby for no reason.

Abortion is the termination of a human pregnancy by choice. A U.S Supreme Court case on January 22, 1973(Roe v. Wade) ruled that unduly restrictive state regulation of abortion is unconstitutional. Although this court case essentially decriminalized abortion, the morality behind it is still heavily questioned 44 years later. Movements such as pro-life and pro-choice have both made strides in converting their beliefs into legislation. However despite the legal progress both sides have made, abortion continues to be an ethnically divisive topic.

I feel that the main argument with abortion is more moral than legal, although they both can go hand in hand for this topic. Morally, I feel abortion is murder. All of an embryo’s DNA is determined as soon as the sperm meets the egg. To me, this means that, even though these cells are not fully developed, the will be with time and they are still a human being that deserves to live even when they cannot fight for themselves. I read a post online once that had an interesting take on this and helped to form my opinion to what it is today. It was about a woman who went to the doctor with her 1 year old son. She found out that she

Concrete detail It is most commonly believed that life begins at conception and therefore that embryo should have full human rights and or the status of a human being.

From the moment the egg is fertilized, the embryo holds full potential to become a human being and thus deserves dignity and unrestricted

One of which is the belief that from the moment of conception, a fertilized egg is “a human subject with a well defined identity.” Any form of harm being committed against this innocent life should be considered inhumane. A developing cell mass, even in the beginning stages of life has all of the rights a human child would have.

Woman have the right to choose to have a baby. They should also have the right to an abortion. There are many reasons why women might choose to have an abortion. What if she was raped, or had a life-threatening medical condition? Abortion has been heavily debated before and since the 1973 Roe vs. Wade decision. Abortion was created in 1550 BC, and throughout western history it was legal, as long as Procedure was performed after 13-25 weeks of getting pregnant (British Broadcasting Corporation ). In 1821 abortion became criminalized and it wasn't until the Roe vs. Wade case that it was declared legal again (Duke Law Journal, Mar. 2003) . Many might say that abortion is murder and that mother will have long term side effects. However, abortion should remain legal because women should have the right to an abortion when they know the baby will have severe health issues, it reduces crime, and prevents self-harm.

In the germinal period which includes the creation of the fertilized egg, called a zygote, cell division, and the attachment of the zygote to the uterine wall (Santrock, J., 2008). To me, I believe that the germinal period is the only prenatal stage that you would not completely consider the fetus as a human being because, though it is a living organism, it shows no indication of being a human. Once in the embryonic period and fetal period, I believe the fetus should have complete human rights. The embryonic stage is the stage when the embryo begins to develop organs which are the first characteristics of a human being. This is why I would consider the embryo to be a human and having human rights from two weeks till birth. According to the law (in most states), it is said that women may not have an abortion after twenty-three weeks and at twenty-three weeks a child is able to live outside of the womb. I have learned this because my, now 3 year old niece, was born at twenty-three weeks and is a perfectly healthy child today with no problems. This means that a fetus can be aborted when viable to live outside of the womb. Regrettably, though, the seeming clarity of the viability rule

According to an article in Time, “The battle for abortion rights has become, in recent years, a losing war of attrition, … [and] lawmakers have steadily chipped away at women’s rights and women’s dignity.” Since the 1800s, the laws surrounding abortions have been debated, arguing whether conception provides the basis for life and therefore human rights, or whether the right to abortion lies solely with the mother. Another argument revolves around whether or not a woman has the right to terminate an unwanted pregnancy or if she should carry it to term. Abortion must be a protected legal right because the decision lies with the mother, as described in the Fourteenth Amendment and interpreted in Roe v. Wade, since the embryo does not have protected rights and in order to maintain the fundamental right to “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness” in the case of terminating an unwanted pregnancy.

One of many questions being debated today is Abortion and the moral legal rights of the fetus. Usually debates about abortion focus on politics and the law. Some believe that the law shouldn’t legislate morality, but all good law is based upon moral values. Behind the debates are more fundamental ethical questions which aren’t always given the specific attention they deserve, like debating the legal status of the fetus. Is the point of conception considered life of the fetus and does that fetus have rights? Many consider the point of conception as the first stage in human development. From a political perspective the first and most fundamental human right is the right to live. If this is so then the fertilized egg would not only have the right to life, but should have the right to develop like any other person.

Margaret Sanger once said that “No woman can call herself free until she can choose consciously whether she will or will not be a mother.” Abortion is the way of ending pregnancy by removing the fetus or embryo before it can survive outside the matrix, which can also allow women to choose whether they want to become a mother or not. However, people have developed the controversy about abortions. Abortion debate is an ongoing debate which has involved moral, legal, biological and religious status of the induced abortion. In this controversy, there are two groups emerged. The group of people who hold the opinion that abortion should be prohibited is known as pro-life, while those who think that abortion should be legal is called pro-choice.