Abortion Is A Controversial Issue

In the 19th century, after tremendous progress in surgical processes, abortions were then conducted by surgeons on a wide scale, while medical abortions are used concurrently. However, as abortion technology prospers, legal restrictions came with it. In 1803, a English statute abolished the previously-legal first trimester abortions. The act “condemned the willful, malicious, and unlawful use of any medical substance when used with the intent to induce abortion” (Stern, 1968). In 1821, Connecticut enabled the first statute in the United States regulating abortions. Within 10 years, states like Illinois, Ohio, New York, Alabama, and others enabled abortion restriction statutes, and by 1968, 50 of the 51 jurisdictions in the United States have prohibited abortion except in the case women’s life is endangered (Ibid., at 3). In 1965, Britain, however, legalized abortion for “medical conditions of the mother, for socio-economic reasons, for eugenic considerations, and for pregnancies which resulted from rape or incestuous intercourse”, which is still law today (Ibid, at 4). In Canada, abortion has been legalized since 1969 through Bill C-150 if “a committee of three physicians determined that the pregnancy was a threat to the woman's life or health” (Norman, 2012). In 1988, Canadian Supreme Court struck down bill C-150’s provision requiring committee approval to receive an abortion in its decision R v Morgentaler, legalizing abortion across Canada for any reasons (Ibid.).

In July of 2015, Canada became the fifty-eighth country to legalize RU-486 (a.k.a. mifepristone or “the abortion pill”). Using a social feminist method and taking an informational/qualitative approach, I will ask and attempt to answer open-ended questions regarding the legalization of the drug in Canada from a feminist perspective. Why did it take so long for Canada to legalize the drug when it’s been available since the 80’s, the same decade in which Canada decriminalized abortion? What medical and ethical objections to RU-486 exist and who is raising them? What are the potential implications of introducing RU-486 into Canada? What other examples of the government stonewalling of women’s issues (pertaining to reproductive health and legal

The topic of aborting an innocent fetus has been overwhelmingly controversial in the United States. The two sides to this ongoing debate is pro-life advocates and pro-choice advocates. Abortion is the ending of a pregnancy by removing a fetus or embryo before it can survive outside the uterus; whether it is an unplanned or unwanted pregnancy. Abortions are most often performed during the first twenty-eight weeks of pregnancy and can be performed as a medical or surgical procedure. Medical abortions include two types of abortion pills; while the surgical procedures include vacuum aspiration and dilation and evacuation. Ultimately, I am one of the many “pro-lifers”, and I strongly agree that abortion should be illegal because it negatively affects our people. Women across the nation are becoming impregnated and following a short amount of judgement time, turn to abortion to solve their problems but in the end hurt themselves with this decision. Abortions should be illegal because it is immoral and unconstitutional, causes severe mental and physical issues, and negatively impacts the economy. “During the ancient Roman times it has been supposed that abortion and the destruction of unwanted children was permissible, but as our civilization has aged, it seems that such acts were no longer acceptable by rational human beings, so that in 1948, Canada along with most other nations in the world signed a declaration of the United Nations promising every human being the right to life”

Despite this attempt, legal abortion access for Canadian women, especially for those who are in rural or remote communities, remains difficult due to the many different barriers, such as not enough of abortionists, unknowledgeable hospital staff, far distance, and high costs. In fact, only 15% of the country’s accredited hospitals had decided to provide the abortion services; in the province of Prince Edward Island, not even a single approved hospital offers the abortion service. Furthermore, anyone who lives in the north has to travel far distance in order to get surgery because most of the hospitals which offer abortion services are usually located within 150km from the US border. Hence, it is very costly and time consuming to travel for the ones who do not live in the city.

Fact: Before 1988, the Criminal Code prohibited abortion unless the life or health of a woman was endangered, the section 251(4) of the Code required them to obtain a certificate from a therapeutic abortion committee of an accredited or approved hospital. In 1998, a very significant decision took place regarding women's rights, which changed this. Dr. Henry Morgentaler, Dr. Leslie Frank Smoling and Dr. Robert Scott were all trained professionals in the medical field, that had organized a clinic to perform abortions for women who did not have a certificate/approval of the hospital. These ladies had publicly doubted the judgment of the abortion laws in Canada and insisted that a woman must have the unfettered right to choose whether or not an abortion is appropriate for her own matters. The legal case was between Dr. Morgentaler and Her Majesty the Queen. In the end of the case, only Justice Wilson, one of the judges defended an abortion right and announced that a constitutional right to abortion or “freedom of choice.” The decision 5-2, was split into four separate judgments. Although only Justice Wilson declared the

If a pregnancy is unwanted or unplanned, does that mean the life of an unborn child should go to waste? Abortion cannot be the solution, it promotes that human life is disposable. If Canadians are uninformed about the abortion guidelines it can affect their decision to abort the child. In Canada, there is a 24-week deadline for women to have abortions. Many factors impact a woman’s judgement to have an abortion, one of which includes religion. However, physical and emotional factors can also impact the mother when terminating a pregnancy. Canadian guidelines should be changed to further restrict “late-term” abortions; abortions should only be permitted under special circumstances due to the numerous valid ethical implications that go hand in

Although it hasn’t always been this way, abortion and prenatal testing are becoming more supported by not only society, but by medical practitioners. Recent statistics given by statistics Canada show that four out of five Canadians agree with the legalization of abortion (Stats Canada, Retrieved on June 5, 2018). On top of this, 77% of Canadians believe that abortion should be permitted (Scotti.M, March 6, 2017). Although this number has dropped slightly from 2016 statistics, it is higher than the global average of 71% (Scotti.M, March 6, 2017). The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario produced a code in September, 2008, which states that a physician must disclose his or her opinion on abortion and must refer a patient if he or she

Your term paper provides an in-depth discussion on the geographic disparities in access to abortion care services. The paper duly distinguishes between provinces and territories disparity, as well as, rural-urban difference. Your paper also discusses the limitations of the literature reviewed. However, it offered no discussion on the theoretical framework used - feminist theory of health and healthcare. Although you state this theory informs the organisational framework, the discussion did not elaborate on the theory and its relation to the access disparities to abortion service. You did Your term paper provides an informed discussion on the mental health care in rural Canada. The paper highlights the differences in observation among researchers.

This author has chosen to discuss the ethical issues of abortion. This is a highly debated topic that will exist amongst women. It is happening at high rates. “In 2013, 664,435 legal induced abortions

Abortion rights are one of the most heatedly debates in society. There are many arguments for and against abortion. Each woman has the right to an abortion and the right to have a child. Women have the resources, rights, and respect to make reproductive health decisions that are best for themselves. (“Women’s”) We live in a free country and women should continue to have the choice to do whatever with their body, concerning women’s rights, health issues, and religious reasons.

Abortion is a controversial issue in many countries all the time and there are always two sides of abortion. Pro-life supporters believe that abortion is immoral, so they argue that it should be illegal because an unborn baby is life. However, they do not figure out that woman who is on the inevitable situation such as infection, rape, or extreme poverty would still have the abortion even though the abortion is illegal. Many women die due to unsafe abortion, which is illegal and performed by uneducated people. Therefore, the abortion should be legal to protect the life of ‘alive women’ because women’s life is equal to human’s right. I would like to provide more affirmative bases to support abortion in this paper.

Before the prevention of abortion was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme court in 1988, the law served as the biggest challenge that women faced when they decided to terminate a pregnancy. Pregnant women when prosecuted would be incarcerated for two years while the doctor who agreed to perform the operation would be imprisoned for life. These consequences served as great deterrence for people who performed abortions and women who wanted to get them. The social and economic consequences of continuing an unwanted pregnancy could also be dramatic, even in a developed country like Canada. Having a child can be a life-changing event that makes pursuing life goals in personal relationships, education and employment much more difficult. The law against abortion was struck down in Canada in part because the Supreme Court of Canada acknowledged that prohibiting abortion interfered with a woman’s ‘‘priorities and aspirations’’. These physical and social demands can indeed be welcomed in the case of a wanted pregnancy. However, if the pregnancy is unwanted and an abortion is denied, forcing a woman to endure the physical and emotional strain of pregnancy and childbirth, and the potential for socio-economic disadvantage can only be experienced as

Since abortions are recommended in the early stages of pregnancy because it is safer for the mother and less problematic surgically, mothers cannot risk delays or waiting lists. Consequently, they are inclined to travel to an alternate province or community in order to acquire access to an abortion clinic. Mothers who want to confidentially abort their child, especially teenage mothers, will have difficulties migrating far for a certain time duration and validating the reasons for their absenteeism. Subsequently, they might attain alternative approaches to manually abort the baby. If they do seek clinics far away, they might encounter additional barriers like language, biased counseling, parental consent requirements, policies, and financial issues which can terminate the abortion process (Downie & Nassar, 2007). Furthermore, some countries or states have anti-abortion legislations where abortion clinics are completely

In the steps in acquiring an abortion, A doctor 's referral is not necessary, although an independent ultrasound usually needs to be done. The quantity of Canadian med schools that give direction in fetus removal strategies is diminishing, which could conceivably make a shortage in medicinal faculty gifted here. Abortion is limited and differently ruled in provinces. Access in British Columbia (BC) is administered by the Access to Abortion Services Act, which confines political exhibits outside of fetus removal giving offices, doctors workplaces, and doctora homes to set separations. Third-trimester premature births are not by and large accessible. Case in point, in Quebec, there is no specialist who will perform a third-term fetus removal unless the wellbeing of the lady is in extraordinary hazard or there is a hereditary issue. The province (quebec) sends ladies who look to have third-term abortions performed to the United States. Quebec is effectively hoping to contract a doctor to do third-term abortion, however has not been successful as of October 2004. Until 2004, Manitoba did not subsidize private abortion centers. Be that as it may, in July 2004 the region 's just private fetus removal facility was bought by a non-benefit association, which then effectively sued the common government to pay for abortion techniques there. In December 2004, a Manitoba Justice decided that the area must pay for every single remedial abortion.l This was overruled in

Abortion is a highly sensitive and controversial subject within the United States that has been an issue of changing opinion for over 200 years. This right has already been resolved to be provided by the Constitution by the Supreme Court. A ban on abortion can possibly violate the separation of church and state, with the reason that those who wish to ban it, are often religious in nature. I strongly believe that the federal government should not ban abortion or have the option to decide what a woman can or cannot do with her own body.