Abortion : Pro Choice Or Pro Life Essay

Abortion is one of the most personal, widely discussed, and controversial topics in American culture today. In most cases, people on both sides of the argument take worthy and moral positions. Who can blame someone who wishes to prevent the termination of a teen pregnancy to save the life of an unborn child? On the other hand, who can blame anyone who advocates the soon-to-be mother's right to make such a personal, heartbreaking choice? No matter what she chooses to do, should anyone have the legal right to force her to bear an unwanted child? Most people in the US are pro-choice, and believe that abortion should be a legal, confidential decision that only a woman can make for herself. However, some are against the idea of

For more than 30 years, reproductive rights have been a controversial topic in the United States pushing people into opposing views as pro-choice and pro-life . In 1973, Roe v Wade granted the legal right for women to abort fetuses before they are viable (Gostin & Reingold, 2016) . However in 1992, Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v Casey gave states more rights to regulate abortions in a way to protect the mother and fetus (Gostin & Reingold) . Gostin & Reingold stated that the 1992 law could protect and define the viability to terminate pregnancy, but states could not make it difficult for women to obtain an abortion if they wanted one . Although the issue has gone through years of legal battles, abortions still lie as personal issues for individuals in society and the medical system . The variability in moral stances about abortion in the medical system and the right of patients to receive fair care can be skewed despite the laws in place (Birnbaum, 2014) . This paper, explores the ethical implication that abortion carries including woman’s rights and how they specifically apply in nursing .

Rawls and Nagel would support Hillary Clinton’s stance on abortion in a secular society, regardless of certain comprehensive doctrines, if we are to call the state just and rational. If we were to consider that women were rational beings, as we should, then rationally the issue of abortion would not be a dilemma. Since we live in a pluralistic society where all citizens comprehensive doctrines are free to be heard, this issue of pro-life and pro-choice becomes a controversy. This creates tension within the public sphere between religious citizens and the public sphere. This can be demonstrated between the different ideology of four theologians. Michael Sandel and Thomas Nagel agree that banning abortion is not correct but they clash in the way that they justify this issue. John Rawls is consistent with Nagel 's theory on the justification of abortion for women but not to the extent of Hillary Clinton’s late pregnancy abortion. Finally Ratzingers argues why rationality can not be the only source for the justification of abortion shows why this causes tensions between the religious citizens and public sphere.

Another argument in favor of abortions is the issue of freedom. If a woman chooses to end her pregnancy, she should have the freedom to do so. Taking away this freedom would be taking away a basic right. A fetus is part of a woman’s body and it would be illogical to restrict a woman’s choice to go through with the procedure. Moreover, the government and prolife activists should not try to regulate the practices of abortion; the fact of the matter is that an abortion is

Abortion is the termination of a pregnancy. Since 1973 abortion has been an important controversial issue within the United States. 1973 marks the year that the famous Rowe versus Wade case was decided before the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court ruled that abortion be legal and available to all women. Legal abortions can be performed up until the sixteenth week of pregnancy, after sixteen weeks most doctors or clinics will not perform the procedure unless keeping the baby presents a medical risk to the mother. Even in these situations abortions are very risky after sixteen weeks.

“Abortion is the spontaneous or artificially induced expulsion of an embryo or fetus” (Abortion, 2002). An artificially induced abortion is the type referred to in the legal context. Abortions happen in different situations. The question comes when is it the right or wrong choice. The root question becomes the moment a fetus becomes a person and entitled to rights. The fetus could be a person at conception, during the pregnancy, or at birth. The deciding moment differs from the Pro-life group and Pro-choice group. After critically analyzing four different arguments about the pros and cons of abortion, one will be able to understand the ethical, moral, and

Abortion is among one of the world’s greatest debates. Americans hold the notion that someone is either pro-abortion or anti-abortion; there is no in-between. There is so much research to support both sides of the issue. For those who support abortion there is research that says that the choice belongs to every woman. There are certain circumstances that support this claim. A woman’s choice to have an abortion is her right. Is it right? Is it murder? There are countless people that view abortion as a tremendous sin, and strongly believe that it is one of the worst sins that can be committed. A fetus does not have the ability to stand up and argue and fight for their chance to live and breathe in this miraculous world. For the people who stand against abortion, those who believe that it is a woman’s choice are seen as the enemy. Advocates for anti-abortion can turn to protests and other activities to support their opinions on the subject. So, what is right and what is wrong? Each person has the right to choose what they believe in. Just like in any other matter in life. A person was guaranteed the right to choose when they were born. A colossal controversy in the discussion of pro and anti-abortion is whether these unalienable rights pertain to the unborn fetus growing inside the mother who legally has the right to choose. Do these rights only belong to those who have breathed their first breath? Anti-abortion advocates will say that in no way is abortion right. These two

Not only is the pro-life argument based on protection of the fetus, it is also concerned with the wellbeing of the women. Consider this story. Christi, a remarkably friendly and outgoing seventeen year old girl was devastated; her world as she knew it was suddenly crumbling to pieces. Frantic over her undesired situation, Christi and her parents could only think of one solution: abortion. The day after Christi's eighteenth birthday, her mother drove her to the Mayfair Women's Clinic in Aurora, California, hoping to solve the intruding problem that had arisen. Christi and her mother's fears diminished when they saw how clean and professional the clinic seemed to be. The doctor led Christi into a counseling room before they proceeded

Advocates identifying themselves, as “pro-choice” believe that choosing to have an abortion are a mother’s right and should not be limited by the government or religious authority. The mother’s right to autonomy supersedes the right of a preborn inherent right to life. Opposed to this are “pro-life” supporters, who believe that the fetus’s personhood begins at the time of conception. The government has a responsibility to preserve all human life, and that rights of personhood should be granted. Putting religion and social views aside, there is irrefutable evidence of potential for

To most pro-choice advocates, an embryo/fetus is not considered a person, because the apparent pain a fetus experiences during an abortion is false, and most people do not believe that life begins at conception. The main concern surrounding abortion for pro-choicers stems from a woman’s right to control her body and what happens to it. Just as a woman is able to decide when she takes birth control, and when she has sex, she should also be able to decide when she has an abortion.. Many say that no baby should be born into an unstable environment where it is unwanted, and that abortion eliminates many of those cases. Since both parties know abortions will happen regardless of legalism, making abortion legal also reduces the amount of abortions performed underground. Therefore, it is safer for women if abortions are

Abortion has become a sensitive topic for many. Personally, I have pro-life beliefs with pro-choice circumstances. Although I do not agree with the overall concept of abortions, I know it will continue to happen whether I like it or not. Thus, I prefer the process to be done safely. Additionally, no matter what my opinion is, everyone has their own rights. After reading this article, there are many aspects in which I agree with Carol Sanger. Firstly, I agree with her statements on the ultrasound laws, “to be persuaded against exercising the right you came in with.” I do not agree with the ultrasound laws. A women should have the right to choose if she wants to see the ultrasound pictures or not. They should not be forced in order to change

What is an abortion? An abortion is a term that refers to terminating a pregnancy by removing the fetus or embryo before its ready for birth. There are two types of abortions; we have a spontaneous and purposeful abortion. A spontaneous abortion is often known as a miscarriage while a purposeful abortion is induced.

The argument of abortion is primarily a moral issue that has created a divide between two groups of people. In general, the two opposing groups are pro-life and pro-choice. Pro-life includes those who do not support abortion, namely the Texas republican party. Pro-choice includes those who support a woman’s choice to have an abortion namely the Texas democratic party. One of the many arguments made against abortion is that, “abortion is prima facie wrong because it deprives someone of a ‘future like ours’.” (Saad). Those who are pro-life believe a human fetus becomes a person upon conception. By having an abortion, a woman is essentially committing murder by terminating what they consider a person. Some pro-life advocates also believe that abortifacients should be illegal because they prevent the natural process of a fetus to form. The Texas Republican Platform states that, “We call upon the Texas Legislature to enact legislation stopping the

About 20 million, out of 45 million, abortions are medically unsafe and can lead to serious injury or death to mothers (Ojeda 13). Illegalizing abortion would bring up the number of medically unsafe abortions. People say abortions should be illegal to stop the killing of unborn babies. The mothers are the ones who really get to decide if they want to be pregnant for nine months or if they want to get rid of the baby that may have been caused by rape, broken condom, or many other reasons. Many bad events could happen if abortion became illegal. The government should make sure that abortion stays legal.

One of a human's main purposes in life is to procreate. Humans are fortunate enough to have contraceptive methods such as the female and male condom, birth control, IUDs, spermicides, and many others. Occasionally these forms of contraception do not work or they are not used, and this can result in the woman becoming pregnant. On average, there are around 31 abortions per 100 live births. Restricting a woman’s right to terminate a pregnancy can result in some extremely negative impacts on the child's life as well as the woman’s life, such as mental health issues, poor quality of life and a possibility of becoming financially unstable. No one should have the freedom to decide what another woman does with her body or her life other than herself. If abortion were to be made illegal it would result in a poor quality of life for the woman and the child.