Abortion: The Right To Choose Essay

My first argument is that women have the moral right to decide what they want to do with their body. The fetus only exists in the body of the female therefore the woman has the right to decide what she wants to do with the fetus. Does the woman only have the right over her body or does she have the right over the

Abortion is a decision every person should decide for themselves. The major arguments against abortion are how a fetus is a person; a fetus has rights; and it is morally impermissible to take a life. Many consider abortion to be equivalent to murder. However, a fetus is not a person. There are important traits one most hold to be a person, 1) self-awareness, one must be able to make decisions regarding themselves 2) being able to converse with others and hold a relationship 3) consciousness, one must be able to make rational decisions and have thought (Warren). On important aspect of being person is the ability to be aware of its surroundings and decision making. Being a pregnant is not a situation everyone gets to experience and the

Development of a fertilized egg into a baby is a continuous process and any attempt pinpoint when the egg becomes a person is debatable and true evidence is hard to find (2012 Murnaghan, Ian). A human embryo is a human being but in its early stages in life, just as an infant is a human but in the stages of a baby. Although, the embryo doesn’t currently have the personality or the features of a human, it will soon become a person. For this reason, I believe it should be given the dignity and respect it deserves as a human

As an ethicist, it is my utmost duty to provide a comprehensible standpoint that will serve to protect the life of these embryos and their natural and legal rights. In regards, to these embryos they have the potential to become a person thus granting it vital. The process involving the development of life arises from a fertilized egg and this is an ongoing process. An embryo is a human being within the embryonic stage, similarly as, the infant is a human being within the infant stage. Although, it appears to be absent of displaying human-like characteristics, it is still developing and will display these characteristics in due time. Since, embryos are capable of being humans they should be given the respect and dignity of a person (2017, Ethical

One of many questions being debated today is Abortion and the moral legal rights of the fetus. Usually debates about abortion focus on politics and the law. Some believe that the law shouldn’t legislate morality, but all good law is based upon moral values. Behind the debates are more fundamental ethical questions which aren’t always given the specific attention they deserve, like debating the legal status of the fetus. Is the point of conception considered life of the fetus and does that fetus have rights? Many consider the point of conception as the first stage in human development. From a political perspective the first and most fundamental human right is the right to live. If this is so then the fertilized egg would not only have the right to life, but should have the right to develop like any other person.

If a woman just finds out that she is pregnant, the group of cells in her womb is not a child, or anything for that matter, that can even have the potential to think on its own and be its own person according to pro-choice advocates. There was a case that was written about in Randy Alcorn’s book, Pro- Life Answers to Pro- Choice Arguments Expanded and Updated, (page 33) where a doctor was about to perform the abortion and Randy writes, “As the surgeon was closing the womb, the miracle happened. Baby Samuel pushed his hand out of the womb and grabbed the surgeon’s finger. Photographer Michael Clancy caught this astonishing act on film. And in that instant, Clancy went from being pro choice to being pro life. As he put it, ‘I was totally in shock for two hours after the surgery… I know abortion is wrong now- it’s absolutely wrong.’” If a baby is taken out of its mother before the abortion is performed, and it already knows to grab and hold onto a finger then it is not just some cells. All babies do that in order to show and be shown affection. If the baby is “not alive” then why and how did it know to do that already when it has not been born

A embryo is not a person nor is a fetus. The fetus or embryo may have DNA but it can't sustain life without a person who has the right to choose the life. Medical practices have come so far that a child back in 1970 was not liable at only 20 weeks of gestation so there was no chance of living but nowadays the chance of a fetus surviving at 20 weeks is greater. Everyone knows that a newborn isn’t viable without the support of a mother, But a newborn, one year old isn't viable without the

organizations would argue that the fetus is not a person until birth. Christian’s reference the

If a fetus is a person, it is a person in very special circumstances – it exists entirely within the body of another much larger person and usually cannot be the object of direct action by another person.

I am inclined to think that we shall probably have to agree that the fetus has already become a human person well before birth. Indeed it comes as a surprise when one-first learns how early in its life it begins to acquire human characteristics. By the tenth week, for example, it already has a face, arms, and legs, fingers and toes; it has internal organs, and brain activity is detectable.

baby takes on its own complex DNA, which is not the same as his mothers. Human life is a gift

When an abortion is performed, during any stage of pregnancy, it is undoubtedly killing a

For thousands of years, people have questioned if actions we’ve become accustomed to are right or wrong. This moral compass has no clear explanations of the criteria to be right or wrong, which leads to a large ethical debate. Technological advancements have allowed us to see the world in a new light, but this also leads to new blurry lines of morality. Whenever something can be researched, people begin to discuss if these actions have a moral standing. This discussion is extremely common in the case of embryonic rights. The underlying issue with the moral status of embryos is that there is no clear definition of when something is considered alive or when it requires respect. It cannot be easily solved because people’s definitions of

individuals who are expert life and against premature birth, consider the embryo as an individual.

Despite this readily available information, a number of arguments are still present and advocate for the legalization and acceptance of abortion. One of the more frequent claims is that a fetus, rather than its own being, is rather a potential being, or just a clump of cells. First of all, one of the six classifications of life is, quite literally, to be a “clump of cells”. There is no clear empirical evidence that points out the distinction between arbitrary sizes of these clumps. From the youngest zygote, to the oldest senior citizen, all humans are clumps of cells. The second and more implicit claim within the above statement, which would imply that a potential being cannot be a life, and is instead comparable to a single egg or sperm cell, is similarly not based in objective truth. The egg and sperm cells, before fertilization, are not genetically unique, but rather are products of the parent, containing parent DNA until conception. It has already been stated that a fetus is a living human, but if fetus is recognized as equivalent to an oocyte or spermatocyte, the entire value of human life becomes both muddled in confusion and laughable. If a sex cell of a parent organism is considered to be alive, why not consider a blood cell or a hair cell? They similarly share the same qualities of any other living cell, but the distinction is found in the uniqueness of a fetus. A skinned knee and a haircut both take away the living qualities of human DNA, but do so in a manner