Abortion Vs Abortion

　　　　In our society, abortion has been a controversial topic that has led some people to take sides on the matter. These two opposing sides (pro-life and pro-choice) fight for their moral and political stance of abortion; raising the questions if abortion is morally right or whether it should be made illegal. Pro-choice activists argue that women should have a right to choose abortion and cling to the idea of freedom, whereas

NARAL pro-choice America is an organization made up of pro-choice women and men that was founded in February of 1969 in Chicago, Illinois. This organization supports legislations to protect access to abortion and bring awareness to reproductive issues. From the “NARAL Pro-Choice of America” from the Salem Press Encyclopedia, this organization’s goal is to guarantee reproductive health which includes the right to have safe and legal abortions to end pregnancy. This group also advocates safe sex education, birth control, quality prenatal care for future mothers or adopters, and fights for paid family leave for new parent(s). This groups are created so abortion is available to any woman, that wishes to end the pregnancy and is another reason on why abortions are important for women and their right to choose it to end pregnancy, and being pro-choice is important so people can support women and their reproductive rights.

Out of all modern social controversies, perhaps the most heated controversy is that of abortion. In today’s society you are either a Pro-life or a Pro-choice, there is not a middle ground. Pro-life are individuals who believe abortion is immoral and should be stop for the wellbeing of women and unborn babies. In contrast, the Pro-choice individuals do not necessarily promote abortion, they just believe women should be the ones to make decisions over their bodies and health. Although the two main sides of the abortion debate have concerns for human life, pro-life activists worries more about the fetus and morals, a clear difference from the pro-choice that worries more for the women and their rights. Based on the points I explored, the pro-choice arguments are stronger than pro-life arguments. Most of both groups arguments comes from peer-reviewed researches from well-known sources to support each individual concept. Effects on women,socio-politics, and fetus are some of the main point of conflicts between the pro-life and pro-choice advocates.

In the United States abortion was legalized in 1973 in the case Roe V Wade but that didn't deteriorate the brutal feud on the issue.It's a matter of personal opinion,culture, or tradition that determines if it's a wrong or right execution.There's been a controversy for decades now on whether or not abortion should remain legal, in other words it's pro choice vs pro life.They’ve disputed the future of the women and the child through debates with few if any compromises.Abortion being legal reduces death and maternal injuries caused by illegal abortions.Abortion needs to continue being legal not only because some mothers or parents are financially incapable of taking care of a child

Abortion is a controversial topic in today's society due to reasons of religion, morality, science, and ethics people perceive. Currently there are two sides to the argument such as pro choice and pro life which push if abortion should be illegal or not. Pro choice supporters believe that individuals have unlimited autonomy with to their own reproductive systems, as long as they don't breach the autonomy

Rationale: The debate between being pro-choice or pro-life is an argument that continues to separate people due to one’s beliefs or values. With this debate I was able conjure an argument that states why I’m pro-choice. A boy in my class said there was two options, pro-life and pro-death, forgetting the real name of the other view (pro-choice). I quickly corrected saying it was pro-choice, because that is exactly what it stands for; one has the choice to make that decision. My audience are people who are not very educated when it comes to this matter, and Susan B. Anthony. I believe everyone has the right to their own beliefs and values. However, how could someone possibly impose their beliefs on everyone and condemn them to one option. My

How a woman uses her body is her concern only. If she chooses to have an abortion, it is her choice and that’s all that matters. Pro-choice is not the same as pro-death or pro-abortion. We are not suggesting that each and every pregnancy ends in termination -- only that the choice is there. It is going to be the person who is carrying that child who ends up with the responsibility of raising that baby, not the people who are picketing outside of the local PlannedParenthood. Perhaps if you are pro-life you can also just be considered pro-birth. Your main focus is to have a baby born, but not about a child raised, fed, or taken care of. If someone doesn’t want a child, then how are they going to take care of it? If we outlaw abortions, women

Freedom, as defined by the Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary, is “The power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants without hindrance or restraint.” Innocent people deserve freedom, yet people are suppressed everyday; and abortion is one right that many women do not possess. Even geographically locations that permit abortion by law do not always guarantee a women this right. Some states in America, for an example, have upwards to twelve restrictive laws against abortion put into place to keep this right suppressed (Guttmacher Institute). Pro-choice is justifiable because abortion isn’t murder, and because every conscious living person with the capability to make a choice has the right to make that choice. Both of these reasons are

If women do not have the right to chose if they want to be a mother or not, they are not being treated equally and getting the rights they deserve. “It should be her right to life that is predominant in pregnancy” is what Katha Pollitt states in “Abortion: No More Apologies” (Pollitt 13). If women do not feel comfortable or safe enough to get an abortion if they need one, they will postpone it and wait longer. The longer a woman waits to have an abortion, the higher the risk (haney 49). Pro choicers think that women are taught to feel safe and secure in this world, and if they do not have the right to their own bodies, how can they feel secure. If women do not feel comfortable or safe enough to get an abortion if they need one, they will postpone it and wait longer. The longer a woman waits to have an abortion, the higher the risk (haney 49). Pollitt says that “legalization changed how women saw themselves: as mothers by choice, not by fate”(Pollitt 13). By this statement, she is saying that women feel good knowing they are not being forced into being a mother, but have the opportunity to if they would like.

When the topic of abortion is discussed people tend to assume one of two standpoints: “pro-life,” they believe that the woman should not have the right to abort a human life because it would be murder or “pro-choice,” they believe that the woman carrying the fetus should be given the ability to decide whether to carry the baby to term or to abort it. Although Americans are divided on the subject of abortion by these beliefs, most do not fall strictly on one side or the other and ultimately the majority favor restricted availability. Abortion is a cruel and disgusting crime, but some still think that it is okay (Arguments For and Against Abortion).

Abortion is a unique social problem in America due to its controversy. Initially, the feminist movement was very popular and due to the shock value was constantly featured in the media which incited public reaction. Eventually, The Supreme Court ruled in favor of women’s rights to have access to abortions in Roe vs Wade causing major policy change in America. The social problems workers such as Planned Parenthood doctors and nurses helped to implement the new policy. The Pro-Life movement reviewed the policy outcome and the work of the social problems workers and deemed the abortion laws a social problem. Through a series of claims, grounds, and warrants The Pro-Life movement activists have been attempting to change the abortion laws

The word abortion brings up very strong feelings, judgements, and opinions. Merriam Webster defines abortion as “The termination of a pregnancy after, accompanied by, resulting in, or closely followed by the death of the embryo or fetus”. Mostly everyone has some kind of opinion on the subject whether they are pro- life, or pro- choice. In this paper I will be discussing my views on the subject and its use in the case of a medical emergency, and as a form of contraception.

Abortion is dividing America. Without a common understanding of abortion, this issue will always be divisive in America. Throughout the history of America, abortion has been an issue that has generally separated people into two camps, those in favor of abortion and those against abortion. However, these two groups, more often than not, have not approached their understanding of this issue from the same perspective. Generally speaking, those in favor of abortion see the issue of the personal rights of women. However, those against abortion, view the issue of the rights of the child. As a result, these two perspectives will never gain unity or a common understanding of abortion. The purpose of this paper is to not only give a clear understanding of both sides of the issue, but to argue that this issue will never be a unifying issue in American culture.

The National Abortion Federation is an organization that supports all of the above views and more and publishes numerous resources covering a wide range of subjects related to abortion for health care providers, medical educators, patients and the public. In face of myths and misinformation about abortion, NAF's resources provide medically accurate information that enables women and the public to make informed choices. Their policy focus on the importance of women having access to safe and legal abortion options. They believe that in recent years Congress has made this impossible by banning safe abortion procedures, voting to make a fetus a person for the purposes of federal criminal law, and restricted access to abortion for federal employees, military dependents, Native Americans, and low-income women. They quote the fact that during his eight year stay in office President Bush has nominated over 200 anti-choice judges to the federal bench, has made a host of other anti-choice appointments to non-judicial posts, and has signed anti-choice legislation passed by Congress, and has used his administration to further policies limiting access to safe and legal abortions. Their view is that abortion providers offer quality care to woman in the face of hostility, harassment, and threats of violence. They advise that reproductive health care providers undertake comprehensive security measures to keep staff and

Abortion is a controversial topic that has been debated in society. In the entry of abortion in The Oxford Companion to the Bible it states, “abortion as such is not discussed in the Bible (Dolansky 51).” Since the Bible doesn’t clearly discuss the topic, abortion, it is currently debated whether it should be accepted or not. People make the argument that getting an abortion is ending a life so one is committing the first commandant by aborting a child. Friedman and Dolansky discuss where the Bible could be relating to abortion in some way.