Abortion Vs Pro Life Essay

Abortion is never an easy decision, but women have been making the choice for thousands of years. It has become a large dilemma since 1973, when the U.S. Supreme Court passed a law making the procedure legal, and an even larger controversial issue. The controversy is divided into “Pro-Choice” and Pro-Life” views. Pro-Choice supporters believe that the woman should have to choice whether to abort or not. Pro-Life supporters believe that it should be illegal to abort and preformed. However, there are many ways for this procedure to be performed. Abortion still remains today a controversial issue, by who should determine if it is the right thing to terminate a pregnancy or not and by how the procedure should be preformed.

The topic I chose to research was the funding of Planned Parenthood, and the services they provide. One of the positions on this topic was to defund Planned Parenthood. The article, by Sarah Torre, "Congress Should End Federal Funding to Planned Parenthood and Redirect It Toward Other Health Care Options" discusses the idea that PP should not receive any government funding to its clinics. A main argument established by Torre is that the flow of federal tax dollars could be redirected to other health providers that do not provide abortions. She specifically proposes that money received from family

Abortion is one of the most personal, widely discussed, and controversial topics in American culture today. In most cases, people on both sides of the argument take worthy and moral positions. Who can blame someone who wishes to prevent the termination of a teen pregnancy to save the life of an unborn child? On the other hand, who can blame anyone who advocates the soon-to-be mother's right to make such a personal, heartbreaking choice? No matter what she chooses to do, should anyone have the legal right to force her to bear an unwanted child? Most people in the US are pro-choice, and believe that abortion should be a legal, confidential decision that only a woman can make for herself. However, some are against the idea of

For many years, abortion has been vexed issue in the United States that conjures strong emotions on both sides. It is a moral issue that tears some people into two groups Pro-life and Pro-choice. Those who are Pro-life state that no matter what the reason behind it, such violent action is murder and should not be executed. On the other hand, the Pro-choice advocates are more respectful of women's rights to take such action; they believe it is their own personal decision since they are the ones who are going to take care of the child, not the law or morality. Despite society's evolving moral standards, the controversy surrounding abortion and women’s' rights still divides our nation. So why did I visit a Planned Parenthood for the first time in my life? Because I was confused as to what is the real face of the people gathered outside the abortion clinic was.

Abortion is the termination of a pregnancy. Since 1973 abortion has been an important controversial issue within the United States. 1973 marks the year that the famous Rowe versus Wade case was decided before the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court ruled that abortion be legal and available to all women. Legal abortions can be performed up until the sixteenth week of pregnancy, after sixteen weeks most doctors or clinics will not perform the procedure unless keeping the baby presents a medical risk to the mother. Even in these situations abortions are very risky after sixteen weeks.

When facing an unwanted pregnancy Many go to their doctors or loved ones for help. The majority of those who do not want to keep their baby turn to Planned Parenthood. Planned Parenthood has gained a bad reputation because they perform abortion services. Individuals who are against abortion are strongly against planned parenthood and often protest outside local clinics. Although planned parenthood is known for their abortion service, they offer many other services that are important to society’s needs such as STD/ STI testing and contraception. In my paper I will be talking about how Planned Parenthood is helpful to individuals, political views on abortion, and the effects of defunding Planned Parenthood.

Prolife or prochoice? This is the debate that seems ongoing for as long as I can remember yet seems to have risen in intensity over the years. We have more recently seen things in the news about defunding Planned Parenthood and there always seems to be protestors on the streets no matter where you go screaming at you their point of view. This essay will focus around the ideology of Planned Parenthood as an organization. Why would people dislike an organization so open to the idea of a human’s right to choose what happens in their own body? I would like to look at both viewpoints of this argument because even though I have my own beliefs I have always been very intrigued in others as well. While I could easily write a paper simply on prolife or prochoice I want to go deeper than that into this well known, and well-argued topic. I will mainly focus on the defunding argument of the organization as well as what they stand for as a whole and what will happen if they no longer exist.

I will connect with my readers by using factual information about abortion.Also, I will attempt to defend and prove my stance at the topic at hand. In addition, I will develop my argument and state why it is of importance Lastly, I

Abortion is a major controversial topic centering on women and their rights to abortion. The argument is life and death though the uncertainty of complication makes it difficult. Abortion is a life or death matter, having equal supporters on both sides that have one goal in common which is to decrease the number of abortions and make abortion safer. Abortion is defined as the “removal of the embryo or fetus from the uterus in order to end a pregnancy” (Dictionary.com). Abortion is surrounded by many questions such as, whether the constitution defends a right to abortion, does this include confidentiality, is a developing fetus a being, and should the law allow abortions in situations such as rape or incest? Many believe the act of aborting an unwanted child should be against the law, while other people feel that a woman’s body is her own and she should have the choice to do whatever she wants. However, many people do not think about the basic human and religious values, the right to live and health risks. Due to the lack of knowledge and sometimes ignorance of it, a huge number of women die every year from unsafe abortions. Abortion due to rape is another controversial topic. Babies born of this act are not intended since the sexual act is forced. Many say killing these babies is okay but is it? Pro-life is a group that goes against abortion claims that human life begins at conception. They believe the unborn deserve life. Even for rape, they believe the child shouldn’t be

Abortion is a topic that seems to be on everyone's minds these days. There are a lot of questions that need to be answered and concerns that need to be put to rest. Women must not be looked at differently because of the choices they make regarding the wellbeing of their child.

Abortion has been one of the hottest topics concerning women’s health care and reproductive rights. Tune into any presidential debate and you’ll notice candidates spending as much time discussing the topic as immigration, foreign policy, climate change, and gun control. There are a lot of misconceptions about the pro-choice movement but it can be explained in very simple terms. Being pro-choice does not mean pro-abortion, it simply means accepting that women have the choice to choose what they do with their bodies, not the government or anyone else. I believe strongly in this issue and believe that we should look at our past and not go back to a time where women did not have the same rights as men over their bodies. We are trying to become equal, not return to an era of submission. No man or government should have the power to control a women’s body; every person has a right to his/her own body. Abortion should be kept an easy, accessible, safe, and legal option for all women regardless of beliefs. We should be taking strides forward toward equality, not steps back. In the mid-twentieth century, second wave feminists saw major struggles of women and sought to radically improve and change the security of women and reproductive rights. We have fought hard for many of the rights we have today, but everyday we are challenged by those who want to oppose and erase our efforts.

The issue that is to be discussed is if the government should continue to fund Planned Parenthood. This question is a sociological issue because it can affect millions of people because in a year Planned Parenthood can help four million people who are mainly low-income, of all religions, and race (Berg). Not only that, but is it something that is constantly being discussed in the media and on the floor, so it is something that we should be focusing on right now. I will say that I am a supporter of Planned Parenthood and I am open that I am also a patient there as well because to me Planned Parenthood is more than just what the media shows, but even so I will stay objective to be ethical in this research (Schaefer).

Abortion is a life or death matter that has two polar aspects with no grounds of agreement. It refers to terminating a pregnancy before it is ready for birth due to underlying reasons. These reasons typically fall into the categories of financial struggle, rape victims, underage, or unexpecting mothers. The Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v Wade declared that it is a crime for a woman to get an abortion and that it violates her due process rights. A stakeholder known as “Planned Parenthood” is an organization whose main objective is to defend the fight for women’s safe access to legal abortion care. While there are doctors that refuse to perform abortions, Planned Parenthood ensures and defends woman’s fundamental human right of choosing abortion. “Planned Parenthood” desires to remind women everywhere that a woman can never be equal if her basic right of making a decision for herself is denied. They endorsed this notion by creating advertisement of protests through the use of rhetorical appeals such as ethos, pathos, logos, and kairos, where they are able to show people their on going fight against anti-choice politicians and activists.

Aristotle held a similar view that many share today: population control and the prevention of passing along genetic mutations. Subsequently, Soranus, a Greek physician (A.D. 98-138), wrote a dissertation compiling his knowledge of gynecological and obstetrical work. He claims that contraceptives differ from abortion, “For the first does not let conception take place, while the latter destroys what has been conceived” (Soranus 62). Within, he lists numerous methods for avoiding pregnancy after intercourse, such as applying freshly ground pomegranate peel as a vaginal suppository, mixing various herbs and wines to later ingest, and even immediately squatting down and sneezing after engaging in sex; “These things not only prevent conception, but also destroy any already existing” (Soranus 65-66). Equally important is Soranus’ mention of two different views on abortion: one side opposes abortives for they believe pregnancy is natural, or fate, and should not be interfered with, while the other faction approves them, but only when they’re used to prevent the mother from dying during childbirth (63). Fast forward to 1803, Britain passed a law known as Lord Ellenborough’s Act, which prohibited abortion; this was the very first law to ban abortion. Any persons who committed the crime of having or performing an abortion would face the death penalty (Keown). Unfortunately, the reason behind the passing of this act was never clear; however, it can be assumed that the intention stems

The right to abortion has been debated continuously by the pro-life and pro-choice camps in courts ranging from local to the supreme court, and it has created a strong divide between the two camps. It is a topic so controversial that political analysts have estimated that it could swing the result of the presidential elections, forcing voters to choose between the pro-choice democratic party and the pro-life republican party. The mainstream media have contributed to this division through their depiction of the absolute division between the two beliefs. But from my personal experience of having conversations with friends and family regarding abortion, the difference between the two sides are not as great as it seems. Although many people in the pro-life camp advocates that all life is sacred, they do not wish to impose their beliefs on to others. But for the government, the decision to allow or ban abortion is not as simple, as the Supreme Court ruled in Roe v. Wade: “[the government has] important and legitimate interest in protecting the potentiality of human life” (“Roe v. Wade(1973)” 7), but they must weigh it against the interest and health of the woman who must carry and raise the child for the next eighteen years. Although the government should consider both social values and individual liberties to reach the most just outcome, the access to safe and legal abortion should be available to all women given that the potentiality of human