Abortion is Murder Essay example

Is abortion murder?  Murder is defined as "illegal killing with malice aforethought." Abortion fails this definition for two reasons. First, abortion is not illegal, and second, there is no evidence to suggest that expecting mothers feel malice towards their own flesh and blood.

Abortion has been one of the most popular and argumentative topics that has still yet to be settled. Ultimately the question we can ask when trying to solve this issue is whether or not pregnant women should have the right to kill an unborn baby. Abortion is the ending of a pregnancy before birth takes place and is a moral wrong. Can we as a society call ourselves human if we allow the deaths of unborn babies to take place? Those who take the side of pro-choice or as also known as pro-abortion often use statements concerning life, humanity, human rights and freedom to support their claims. I believe abortion should be illegal because we as a society must protect the human lives that are in danger whether or not they are in their first

Abortion is murder. Abortion is a worldwide talked about issue in today's society and there are many views on the morality of the legal procedure to end a child's life. But a human is no less a human simply because it's smaller and more delicate. 40-50 million abortions are performed each year because of the “Woman's Rights”. But how can we let mothers make the decision to end the child's life before even given the chance to live it, because of an inconvenience.

In Americas Society Abortion is a topic that most people rather not face. More and more abortions occur everyday, causing potential lives to be terminated due to irresponsible sexual activity among adults and teens. Abortions cheats the unborn child of his or hers existence and unknown experiences to come. Abortions are quick escape goats for irresponsible individuals and cause pain, suffering, and death. I t is against the law and immoral to kill another human being, and by terminating a fetus you are performing another act of killing. In my essay I will use different articles and references to back my conclusion of how Abortions are cruel, examples of different types of abortions and how

When implementing this model within the topic of abortion the first and, for some, the uppermost principle of the value of life creates possibly one of the most relevant debates surrounding this issue. The organisation Pro-Life state that absolute respect for human life is the keystone of justice and the right to life is the most important right from which all others flow. The movement argues that even non-viable, undeveloped human life, is sacred and must be protected. Pro-Life members are diverse in economic status, race, religion, and education. They are unified by the concept that all humans, especially the innocent unborn, have an inherent right to life.  One of the main reasons against abortion given by Pro-Life advocates is that life begins at conception and that, by terminating the pregnancy, causes the foetus to die. They point out that during the first 8 weeks of pregnancy, when most abortions take place, a baby develops a heartbeat and elementary brain activity. It is believed that, by terminating a pregnancy, this seriously violates the human rights of the foetus and discriminates the fundamental principle of the value and right of life. This termination results in the foetus becoming a ‘silent’ victim of murder (www.prolife.org.uk). Many people and particularly those from religious backgrounds believe that nobody has the right to kill or take a life that god has created. Others argue that if

Again the pro-life argument on the abortion issue defines human life as beginning with conception. Medical research has proven that the fetus is a living organism from the moment of conception. Some may argue that a living organism cannot be considered a person, but what else can it be. Once the sperm and egg unite, the 23 chromosomes of each are brought together to form one cell with 46 chromosomes. Once this cell with 46 chromosomes is formed, that one cell has all of the DNA, the entire genetic code that makes up a human being. Everything which constitutes a human being is in that one cell from conception on it just takes time to grow and develop. Who is the one person able to claim at what minute in time a fetus changes from a living organism into a human being. The start of human life should not be a religious, moral, or philosophical issue since each and every person has their own morals and views. The beginning of life should be a scientific and biological issue. Science says that once the 46 chromosome cell is formed, the unborn fetus

There are many different ideas on when life begins, yet none are concrete enough for people to agree upon. Despite the differing ideas of when a person has emerged from a fetus, lawmakers still have to make the crucial decision of when an abortion should be outlawed. Because scientific data has yet to conclude when the fetus passes into personhood, legislators should be wary of using emotional or religious views when deciding the law.

The greatest controversy with determining if abortion is permissible or not is one of defining if whether the fetus is a human being or not. In a genetic sense a human being is defined as the member of biological species, homo species which includes fetuses and humans without functioning brains. In the moral sense a human being is defined as a fully-fledged member of the moral community, consisting of all and only persons. Moral humanity overrides the genetic humanity in that there are five characteristics that entitle an entity to be considered a person: consciousness and in particular the capacity to feel pain; reasoning; self-motivated activity; capacity to communicate; and the presence of self-concept and self-awareness [The ethics of abortion, (2015)]. Warren (1973) argues that if any ‘being’ does not possess most of these characteristics it is then rendered not a human being in the moral sense, thus assuming that there is no stage during fetal development at which a fetus resembles a person enough to have a significant right to life [The ethics of abortion, (2015)]. A counter-argument to the above school of thought points out that if killing the fetus is permissible because they are not ‘full-fledged’ members of the moral community, by the same standards it would be permissible or justifiable to kill new-borns as they have not entailed these five characteristics of ‘personhood’ and depend fully on an adult individual to survive and cannot survive on its own.

Abortion, for years, has called into debate questions related to the morality of life and death situations. Philosophers in particular have discussed in length the notion of ‘personhood’ as it pertains to the morality and permissibility of life and death situations (such as abortion). Questions such as; ‘What constitutes a person?’ and ‘If a foetus is a person, is abortion murder?’ are vital to many of societies beliefs, the answers to which often dictate which side people sit of the abortion debate, pro-life or pro-choice. As with any bioethical issue there is never a clear line of ‘yes this is good’ or ‘no that is bad’, and so we see constant disagreement between two very different and varying views. To answer the many questions surrounding

Abortion is being constantly talked about and always has, it is personhood versus humanity. For example, Hitler acknowledged that Jews were human beings but however not of personhood. Humanity is human beings in a whole, personhood is the quality of being an individual person. Many say that an unborn baby isn’t an individual person hence not being of personhood. Size, level of development, environment, degree of dependency those are reasons people do not consider little humans of personhood. (Bridge, Catholic)

Since 1973, when it became legalized, abortion has been of the most controversial ethical issues in America. In the court case of Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court came to the conclusion that women have the right to privacy which includes the right to having an abortion. This ruling has caused many controversies and millions of people throughout America protest against abortion every year. Abortion is an operation of other intervention to end a pregnancy by removing an embryo or fetus from the womb. Since its ratification, more than forty-eight million unborn children have been killed by means of abortion in the United States since the Roe vs. Wade judgment (Abortion in the United States).With abortion outlawed, these lives could have been

In short, Roe vs. Wade has had an enormous impact on our society as a whole. It might be hard to see the effects it is having on us because we are so involved in our daily lives that we hardly ever take a closer look at what is going on around us. We

Many Christians and scientist wonder whether abortion is scientifically or biblically wrong. For a Christian you have to prove that God values life before birth and that he has a pro-life stance. You have to also prove that God considers the time in the womb just another stage. From a scientific perspective you have to prove that the zygote, embryo, or fetus is indeed alive. You also have to consider at what point during development it becomes alive. You would also have to prove that it is human. This would show us that killing or aborting it would be ending life therefore murdering.

The topic of elective abortion is greatly contemplated, with arguments on either side: opposing and supporting the legalization of abortion. Both sides, whether Pro-Life or Pro-Choice, have many of their arguments backed by ethical and moral theories. The basic dilemma of whether or not abortion is morally permissible stems from the question of personhood. Personhood entertains the idea of what constitutes the term "human being." Does a human being have more than just a genetic sense? Are there certain criteria that are applicable when deciding whom or what is considered a “human being?” Do factors such as at what point does human life begin to play a part in the decision? These are all questions that philosophers take into mind when attempting to back their position on the morality of abortion. These are all questions that could have more than one answer, but one basic premise that exists in our world that has only one answer is: Is it wrong to kill humans? The answer to this is universally accepted as yes, it is wrong. But, this is where the conflict begins. Pro-life supporters believe that this premise can be applied to fetuses because fetuses are people. Whereas pro-choice supporters understand this universally accepted statement, and abide by it, they believe that this concept has no effect on the morality of abortion seeing as a fetus is not a person, either not until birth or later into the development. The basic discussion of whether or not the fetus has a moral

Due to the fact that they changed their minds, it causes the main debated in the battle over whether abortion is morally acceptable. At times in church history, the point at which life was thought to begin varied. Some thought human personhood began at conception, while others believed in the Aristotelian concept that life began 40 to 80 days after conception when the soul enters the body (Childress and Macquarrie 2). Today, science shows that although the human ovum, or egg, is alive when it enters a woman’s fallopian tubes, it is not considered a human being until it meets with a sperm causing conception and the beginning of life as a diploid.