Robert Day
Miss. Leavitt
English Composition 1
November 18, 2014
The Legacy of Lincoln: A President For The People
In a time when political injustice and scandals plagued Washington D.C, many lost faith in their government and the union which it looked to preserve. The country brought to the verge of civil war, only one man was thought to be the best chance to keep the nation intact in the Republican Party. His name was Abraham Lincoln. In this captivating biography, Doris Goodwin, a much admired historian, gives readers insight on what made President Lincoln one of the most respected and well known presidents in the history of the United States. Goodwin makes the case for Lincoln's political prowess by inspecting the connections he had with
…show more content…
Chase, William H. Seward and Edwin Stanton. These men, all skilled, nationally known, and diplomatic, originally belittled Lincoln for his lack of experience and rural upbringing, and were appalled at losing to this backwoods Illinois Lawyer and failed politician. Lincoln not only convinced them later on to join his administration, but in time he ultimately gained their admiration and respect as well. If he did not possess the wisdom and confidence to select and work with arguably the people most suited for the positions, he could not have led the nation as effectively through this time of turmoil. Though Goodwin can't help but cover the basics of the history of Lincoln, the angle is focused enough to offer a new perspective on Lincoln's leadership style and his innate understanding of the complexity of human behavior and morality. Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln shows readers detailed accounts and information of Lincoln’s political career in office about why he had made the choices he made, how imperative …show more content…
The end concludes, Lincoln wanted political power not for his own glorification, profit, or amusement, but because he wanted to for humanities sake. This drive kept him going in his early years of obscurity and enabled him always to put the good of his country above his own ego. Lincoln was not a politician in it for the fame or to push his agenda upon the masses, but he was a true humanitarian, and Goodwin credits him for it. Quotes from men like Walt Whitman, Ulysses S. Grant, and Leo Tolstoy who also give Lincoln admiration and respect for what he had done during his time as president substantiated the claims. Goodwin quotes Tolstoy near the end of the book about why Lincoln’s name had become so legendary: “Now, why was Lincoln so great that he overshadows all other national heroes? He really was not a great general like Napoleon or Washington; he was not such a skillful statesman as Gladstone or Frederick the Great; but his supremacy expresses itself altogether in his peculiar moral power and in the greatness of his character” (Goodwin, 2203). This was a man who had such strong determination to benefit others before anything else. This emphasizes just why Lincoln has kept such awe-inspiring status since his death while the seemingly good names of other assassinated presidents have fluctuated with time. In a time when political injustice was very apparent in
In her award-winning book entitled Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln, Doris Kearns Goodwin quotes the former president as warning his delegation prior to the Chicago Republican Convention to “Make no contract that will bind me.” Lincoln was the sculptor of his own life. He had spent years chiseling himself into the model leader that he wanted to present to the nation. An independent thinker, Lincoln did not want the political whims of others to define him. In the same fashion, I am a person who eschews the capricious desires of society.
The strengths of this book is that it is well organized and credible. Dilorenzo organizes the book to “raise . . . questions” about Lincoln (Gamble 1). Dilorenzo does a great job of making the reader think because it is so well organized and does not jump back and forth for one subject to another. Also, Dilorenzo uses credible sources throughout the book.
Lincoln was a mainly unknown prairie legal representative, and at the start of the war which everybody estimated to be over quickly, he did not tell much about how to choose and use the superlative Generals. By the half, nevertheless, he had skillfully maneuvered a condition where the British and French might not send help to the Confederates without observing pro-slavery, and then made the astute decision to back U.S.Grant as his General-in-Chief. For the time being he had exposed outstanding dexterity in the management of his talented but rebellious cabinet, and by the period of his tragic assassination, had got his place as one of the boundless men of American history, probably the greatest.
Was born on February 12,1809 in the Hodgenville Kentucky. He was killed by John Wilkes booth on April 15,1865,Good Friday, at the age of 56. Abe had 2 siblings ,1 sister and 1 brother, and had 4 kids with his wife Mary Todd Lincoln. He served as a president for 2 years and faced reelection in 1864. Although he only had 3 months of military service he led the United States through the civil war. His sister Sarah died at the age of 20 and his brother didn’t live for more than 3 days. Not only was Abe a president and a war hero but he also was a lawyer. He was the 16th president and he was a republican.
Abraham Lincoln was the sixteenth president, and served during an incredibly fragile and monumental age in America’s growth. As president during the civil war, and creator of the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, he was controversially viewed as either an innovator or a wrongdoer. In any light, his presidency and murder created shockwaves throughout America during their time of post-war healing and grief, and sparked change that led the U.S to be the country it is today. The assassination of Abraham Lincoln was unjust because he was an influential leader and active abolitionist who made great changes for equality in America, but he completely disregarded the needs of the confederate movement during their time in the Civil War.
Although James McPherson presents Lincoln as having numerous qualities that defined him as a brilliant leader, he wastes no time in revealing what he believes to be Lincoln’s greatest strength. In his Introduction, McPherson states regarding Lincoln’s political leadership: “In a civil war whose origins lay in a political conflict over the future of slavery and a political decision by certain states to secede, policy could never be separated from national strategy…. And neither policy nor national strategy could be separated from military strategy” (McPherson, p.6). Lincoln could not approach the war from a purely martial standpoint—instead, he needed to focus on the issues that caused it. For the catalyst of the war was also the tool for its solution; a war started by differing ideologies could only be resolved through the military application of ideology. This non-objective approach to the waging of the war almost resembles the inspired approach McPherson brings to his examination of Lincoln himself.
Lincoln outperformed Douglas through overcoming Douglas’s mudslinging, public perception, and
The first of the two sources to be examined here is Allen Guelzo's House Divided: Lincoln, Douglas, and the Political Landscape of 1858. This source took a more technical examination of not just the speeches and overall influence of Lincoln during this time, but also on where politics stood around the middle of the nineteenth century. To begin with, this source took a more critical examination at the Lincoln-Douglas race from the perspective of the complex political situation that was inherent during this time. That is to say, the campaigns that were waged were not merely about how viable each candidate was for office, but rather the philosophical differences between these individuals and many others, according to the source. This means that the source was able to take a closer look at why Abraham Lincoln, as well as Douglas, actually believed what they did. This retrospective aspect of the source allowed
In Abraham Lincoln, by George McGovern, McGovern summarizes and gives insight on one of the United States’ most well-known and highly praised presidents, Abraham Lincoln. McGovern thoroughly outlines Lincoln’s life, his struggles and how he became the great president that he was. One point McGovern continues to mention is how no matter how bad a situation was or even when people doubted Lincoln, he would take his defeats and preserve. In the beginning of the book, McGovern recounts Lincoln’s life as a kid and a young adult. He describes how no matter how bad Lincoln failed or how sad he was, “Lincoln would not resign himself to failure and loss; instead he learned from each experience and carried on” . In addition, McGovern continues to mention how Lincoln never stopped learning. From a young age, Lincoln loved to learn, read and expand his knowledge so he could fully analyze any situation. According to McGovern, this personality trait allowed Lincoln to work and rise up from a farmer’s son to the President of the United States. This trait, also, allowed Lincoln “to take a far more active role in managing military affairs” . Lincoln was able to come up with a new strategy for the Union to win the Civil War.
In Thomas DiLorenzo’s book The Real Lincoln, is about giving the people who want to know the real story about the “greatest” American President. When in fact he was not all that great of a president. People know him as the great emancipator. This is ironic because “Lincoln barely ever mentioned the issue of slavery before 1854, and, even then, he did not seem sincere” (3). This is what everybody knows Lincoln for is freeing the slaves, but it proves that he is given credit for something he did not do. What else was Lincoln given credit for that he did not deserve? Thomas DiLorenzo is a professor of economics in Sellinger School of Business and Management at Loyola College in Maryland. Specializing in history and political economics. He has
Thomas J. DiLorenzo exposes the preconceived “Hero” myth of Lincoln in his novel “The Real Lincoln”, while also conjuring an internal debate within the reader. In doing this he creates intrigue, which encourages a more thought provoking study into Lincoln’s legacy. The novel covers a wide variety of content, starting with Lincoln’s run at the local and state government levels, while also expanding on his late political career – a time during which the Union’s struggle to secure State’s rights led to the conflict we know as the Civil War. DiLorenzo delves deeper into the Lincoln political machine, and delves deeper into the economic and social policies during his tenure in office, ultimately demonstrating how the Lincoln administration changed policy for the years to come.
One of the ironies of the Civil War era and the end of slavery in the United States has always been that the man who played the role of the Great Emancipator was so hugely mistrusted and so energetically vilified by the party of abolition. Abraham Lincoln, whatever his larger reputation as the liberator of two
April 15, 1865 was a highly anticipated evening at Ford’s Theatre in Washington, D.C. President Abraham Lincoln, along with Vice President Andrew Johnson and Secretary of State William Seward were scheduled to attend a showing of Our American Cousin. This enjoyable gathering soon turned to tragedy for the American leaders. In the middle of the performance, shots were fired and blood was shed while the unassuming audience sat oblivious to the events unfolding. John Wilkes Booth executed his scheme to assassinate President Lincoln, one of the most important and influential men in American history, who inspired the masses with his unexpected rise to power.
Abraham Lincoln was considered by many American’s as one of the greatest Presidents of the United States. Having come from humble beginnings it could be said that Abraham Lincoln rose up to meet all the challenges that would greet him, and it could be argued that at the time the only person who could successfully guide the United States through the Civil War was Abraham Lincoln. At the time of his presidency, the United States was falling apart, with the South trying to secede from the North, creating much chaos that Lincoln had to deal with. He worked slowly and throughly, which sometimes got people agitated but he was a very careful working man and knew that it was better if he took his time. Abraham Lincoln was not
In the history of the United States of America many men have made contributions to our nation, whether it be small or large. Our founding fathers John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and George Washington helped give birth to our nation by successfully guiding us through a revolution and our country’s infancy. Franklin D Roosevelt led the nation through a war on two fronts eventually defeating the Axis powers of Nazi Germany and Japan. The list could go on and on about legendary men that made important contributions to the United States of America, however one man that seems to always come out on top of all these men is none other than our sixteenth president Abraham Lincoln. This man guided a nation through a Civil War that saw six hundred and twenty thousand people die. Signed the Emancipation Proclamation declaring “that all persons held as slaves" within the rebellious states "are, and henceforward shall be free." And gave one of the most famous speeches in American history with is Gettysburg Address. The amount of things Lincoln accomplished in his lifetime could go on and on, but one thing is for certain he was one of the greatest Americans to ever live. However what type of man was Lincoln? Noble? Driven? Stephen B Oates gives us the best interoperation of the man Lincoln really was in his book With Malice Toward None.