Abraham Lincoln 's Emancipation Proclamation

On january 1 1863, Lincoln delivered the emancipation proclamation, reshaping the cause of the Civil War, from saving the Union, to abolishing slavery. Lincoln's emancipation proclamation stated that all individuals who were held as slaves “hence ward shall be free”.( Biography). President abraham lincoln became father abraham a near mythological hero. A “lawgiver” to african americans,And a masterpiece of god sent to save the union.(Biography). His humor was present as an example of his humanity. His humorous pardons stated his “great soul” and his sorrowful demeanor reflected the burdens of his journey as the leader of a “blundering and sinful country”.(Biography). This shows that Abraham Lincoln impacted all the lives of african americans that were enslaved during the Civil War. Because he was committed to preserving the union and thus vindicating democracy no matter what the consequences to himself the union was indeed saved. Because he understood that ending slavery required patience, careful timing. Shrewd conclusion, and an iron resolve, slavery was killed. Lincoln managed in the process of saving the union and killing slavery to define the creation of a more perfect union.(

The Emancipation Proclamation was a pivotal document in the American Civil War, but not for the reason a lot of Americans think. Crafted by 16th president, Abraham Lincoln and issued on January 1, 1863, The Emancipation Proclamation did not free the slaves ("The Emancipation Proclamation"). Rather it did not free any slaves in the Union. The Emancipation Proclamation stated all slaves in the rebellious states "shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free" ("The Emancipation Proclamation"). The most important phrase in this quote word being "rebellious states," this phrase means that the only slaves being "freed" were the ones who currently lived in the place where the people did not consider

With the Civil War in full swing in 1863, President Lincoln was grappling with a nation divided. Long-standing racial turmoils had finally boiled over in 1861 with the battle of Fort Sumter. The country had been thrown headfirst into bloody battles, culminating most recently with the infamous Battle of Antietam. Antietam allowed the president to issue the most important document of his career with a narrow Union “victory”and an attempt to boost low spirits. As a result, the North secured an advantage when Lincoln announced his intent to free all Confederate slaves with the shocking Emancipation Proclamation. Determined on securing and protecting the Union, Lincoln took a pragmatic approach in issuing the controversial document. A defining moment in American history, it is essential to investigates the reasons and acts leading up to it, the responses it elicited from the nation and the world, and its effects on the country.

In school we are taught that Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves. This statement is reinforced continuously throughout our education, beginning from the time we are in elementary school to when we are in high school. However, it’s never really expounded upon when taught. The discussion never goes further than ‘Abraham Lincoln enacted the Emancipation Proclamation and thus freed the slaves’, but is still able to instill the implication that he did so out of his own moral values and that life for ex-slaves was better for it. The truth of the matter is actually the complete opposite. The emancipation proclamation was a purely political decision that instead of truly freeing the slaves, only served to keep them bound.

The Emancipation Proclamation is centered on the concept of freeing the slaves; however, the proclamation did not actually free any slaves but had a greater goal of preserving the Union through European alliance. The Emancipation Proclamation did not free slaves in Union controlled lands but instead freed the slaves where the federal government had no real power. At his inauguration, Lincoln even stated that he has “no lawful right [to] interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it [already] exists.” Furthermore, Lincoln revealed, in a letter to Horace Greeley that slavery is not even a primary focus of his political agenda when he stated “my paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and it is not either to save or destroy slavery.” This letter also emphasizes Lincoln’s chief interest during the American Civil War – to maintain the Union. Therefore, Lincoln himself indicated that the Emancipation Proclamation’s purpose was to preserve the Union by successfully aiding in closing the door to European intervention in the South.

An example of a presidential executive order which congress did not authorise would be Abraham Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation.

1) What is the Emancipation Proclamation? When is Baldwin’s letter written and what is the significance of the timing of his letter (specifically: what is the situation of African Americans at the time Baldwin wrote the letter?)

Lincoln released the Emancipation Proclamation at a pivotal moment in the war; thus, marking the first significant movement that was widely recognized as the beginning of the end of slavery. In September of 1862, after the Battle at Antietam and the Union’s victory, President Lincoln cleverly issued a statement declaring that the rebellious states, Delaware, Kentucky Missouri, and Maryland, would have to return to the Union by January 1, 1863 or freedom would be granted to the slaves of those states. President Lincoln’s timing in delivering his preliminary proclamation guaranteed that the Emancipation Proclamation would positively influence the Union’s efforts. Not one of the four confederate states complied with President Lincoln’s terms.

The Emancipation Proclamation was an executive order. I think it was very important for Lincoln to start off by identifying himself as the President of the United States before he begins to say anything else. Adding on to that fact he also states he is Commander in Chief to really stress upon that the Emancipation Proclamation was going to try restore the relations with the Union and the Confederate States. He try's to compensate with the Confederate and basically says 'I will not free the slaves from any state that will come back to the Union." But in this case none of them did. So he compensated emancipation for the slave owners willing to sell their slaves to the government.

Abraham Lincoln had more power to fight against slavery than Frederick Douglass because of his presidency. SInce he was the president one of his first actions was to create the Emancipation Proclamation as it states “ This proclamation ensured freedom for most slaves in the United States. By issuing the proclamation, Lincoln took an important first step to ending the practice of slavery in the United States”(The

However the impact on such history is both that of national mercy and unilateral overreach. The Emancipation Proclamation sought to free 3.5 million slaves, but it was more-so punishment of the ten states remained rebels to the Union as of 1863. The Proclamation was an Executive Order by the President, a unilateral document that did not see the vote of Congress or advice of the Judiciary. Instead it imposed drastic measures of war on states, while it may have been signed in the interest of freedom it was done so with the neglect of freedom. This impact is a lasting one, a precedent for many American President’s who have acted unilaterally, on fundamental issues such as war and immigration- the idea of the ‘Imperial Presidency’. However 4 million American slaves were freed by Lincoln’s signature and ability to advance the thirteenth amendment through the lame duck session of Congress. Forever impacting the national history, truly establishing the land of the free and allowing the ‘negro’ to eventually stand equal to the white man, to do as he wishes, even to run for

The Emancipation Proclamation was not the first bill to deal with slavery. However, it definitely was the first legal measure to touch down right on the heart of the conflict between the North and the South. Before continuing in the treatment of Emancipation proclamation in this paper, it must be noted that the Emancipation Proclamation was not a work by the president to contribute for the incarnation of an anti-slavery belief he had due to many reasons. First, the fact that Abraham Lincoln had no intention to take the office or to engage in a war with the southern states standing on anti-slavery goals has been already clarified within this paper. Second, if Abraham Lincoln’s war goal was to free the slaves, it would

On September 22, 1862, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, issued the first, or preliminary, Emancipation Proclamation. In this document he warned that unless the states of the Confederacy returned to the Union by January 1, 1863, he would declare their slaves to be “forever free.” During the Civil War, he was fighting to save the Union and trying not to free the slaves. Lincoln was quoted to say, “I am not, nor have ever been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races.” The Emancipation Proclamation illustrated this view.

From Guezlo’s introduction of “Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation: The end of Slavery in America”, he acknowledged that this is one of the representative of President Lincoln’s writings in the history demonstrating his dedication to free “four million black slaves”. At the end of Guezlo’s introduction, he proposed the idea of how Lincoln would be a white friend to African American due to the power, the position he had that can help him to start deliverance. The author stated, “It would be special pleading to claim that Lincoln was in the end the most perfect friend black Americans have ever had. But it would also be the cheapest and most ignorant of skepticisms to deny that he was the most significant” (359). The president was described as a manumitter who broadens the destinies for the Negroes. Moreover, this is also an opportunity to solve the happening concerns between masters, slaves, and many others involving folks. Additionally, in Guezlo’s pieces of evidence, he suggested that there was always the thought of releasing African American slaves in Lincoln’s mind even from the day when he first had the presidential oath. The president implied the “hatred” he had on slavery, of how it might affect the world, “I hate it because of the monstrous injustice of slavery itself …” (354). Lincoln insisted that having slavery is equal to the violation of the Declaration of Independence as well as the belief of the Republicans of how this issue would influence the whole society.

The freedom of America’s slaves has always been accredited to Abraham Lincoln, but he was not always the complete abolitionist as he is commonly portrayed. The “house divided”, as Lincoln depicted it in his famous “House Divided” speech, of the United States during the Civil War was not always led towards the freedom of all mankind and there is sufficient evidence to support this claim. The sixteenth president of the United States is most commonly remembered for inducing the courage and determination to end the American Civil War with the Emancipation Proclamation although, when it is more closely studied, he did not cross the great divide of enslavement vs. freedom with the submittal of that fabled document. When reviewing the many famous