Aca's Code Of Ethics: A Case Study

The ACA and NAADAC code of ethics will help the counselor with decision making. When the counselor is not sure how to act or say about an issue, it is important that she goes back and review the ACA and NAADAC code of ethics to make sure she is not being biased or discriminating a client in her practice. ACA and NAADAC is a guide that will help the counselor to reference.

* Justice - concerns the distribution of scarce health resources, and the decision of who gets what treatment (fairness and equality).

There are four principles of ethics: Respect for autonomy, Beneficence, Non maleficence and Justice. This four principles offers comprehensive thought of the ethical issues in clinical settings (Beauchamp and Childress 2001 cited in UK Clinical ethics Network 2011).

I thought your discussion post this week was great. After looking at exercise 4-4 I completely agree with you that using PRN nurses and working with float nurses is such a smart idea. Decreasing discharge teaching time like the manager wants to do on the unit is unsafe and unethical to patients. The nurses on the unit are doing their part by providing excellent patient care, but reducing education can lead to dangerous outcomes for patients in the long run. Provision 3 of the ANA Code of Ethics (ANA, 2015) states that nurses should promote, advocate, and protect the rights, health, and safety of every patient. By implementing your proposed thoughts I really do believe wait times and patient satisfaction could certainly improve. There are always

The 2014 ACA Code of Ethics provides structure that protects clients. Responsibilities that counselors to be aware of is avoid imposing their own values, attitudes and beliefs on clients (Ethics, 2014). Developing a relationship with clients requires providing counseling in a culturally sensitive manner (Ethics, 2014). Counselors respect the diversity of clients take measures to ensure that they are not of risk of imposing their values onto clients (Ethics, 2014).

Autonomy includes three primary conditions: (1) liberty (independence from controlling influences), (2) agency (capacity for intentional action), and (3) understanding (through informed consent) (Beauchamp & Childress, 2009, p. 100). According to Beauchamp & Childress (2009) to respect autonomous agents, one must acknowledge their right to hold views, to make choices, and to take actions based on their personal values and beliefs (p. 103). Respect for autonomy implies thaturges caregivers to respect theassist a patient in achieving? Heed? the autonomous choices of their patients. From there, patients can act intentionally and with full understanding when evaluating medical treatment modalities. Autonomy also includes a set of rules, one of which requires that providers honor patient decision-making rights by providing the truth, also known as veracity (Beauchamp & Childress, 2009, p. 103). In this case, several facets of the principle of respecting autonomy, specifically veracity, informed

These principles have become widely used frameworks for ethical both in healthcare practice and also in clinical research. A few brief definitions; beneficence refers to the balancing of benefits of a treatment against the risks and acting in the way that most benefits the patient. Nonmaleficence is the avoidance of excessive harm. All treatments will have some risks and harm however minimal, the principle of nonmaleficence requires that the harm should not be disproportionate to the benefits of the treatment. Respect for patient autonomy is just as it states, that the patient should be respected as someone who can make reasoned, informed decisions of their own free will. Lastly, the principle of justice simply requires that risks and benefits be distributed fairly and that patients in similar situations should get similar treatments from their healthcare professionals. In another article, Macklin criticizes the four principles for not providing a useful way of solving bioethical issues, rather she believes that they provide a “sound and useful way of analysing moral dilemmas” (Macklin, 2003). I am inclined to agree with Macklin here, because it appears that

The ACA Code of Ethics states, “when counselors are faced with ethical dilemmas that are difficult to resolve, they are expected to engage in a carefully considered ethical decision-making process,” (ACA, 2014, p. 3). Throughout these three case studies, I will use the seven-step ethical decision-making model to address the important professional issues, relevant ethical codes, and legal standards (Forester-Miller & Davis, 1996). By applying the steps to each case I will share how I came to my resolutions.

There are multiple precautions and/or practices that private practitioners can adopt that will minimize their liability, while also promoting the best possible practice and therapy for their clients. Following the Code of Ethics, while maintaining current educational and supervision practices also help.

The article I found about a HIPAA breach in confidentiality involved a Walgreens pharmacist in Indiana. The pharmacist looked up the prescription history of someone her husband had previously dated. She then shared the information she found with her husband who in turn tried to use the information in a paternity suit. The lady whose information was accessed complained to Walgreens officials. As a result the pharmacist was given a written warning and required to retake training regarding HIPAA rules. The Marion Superior Court jury found Walgreen's responsible for the actions of their employee. They ordered Walgreens to pay $1.44M in damages and the Indiana Court Of Appeals upheld the decision. I looked on the Kentucky State website about

In the case of 33 years old Ken, presented in his friend's office of is a Mental Health Counselor. He is dealing with depression, he broke up with his fiance, and has no job since moving to be with his ex fiance. He does not know what to do, he feels worthless, he feels like when he make choices about his life, they never go the way he plans it. He starts telling his friend about what is going on. He is asking for his friend professional opinion.

In this manner, the changeless patient issue makes moral difficulties for human services experts and healing center overseers as they endeavor to accommodate contending commitments. Patient self-respect and decision may be bolstered and proceeded with inpatient hospitalization if that what the patient desires. On the other hand, human services experts and healing facility directors have an obligation to be great stewards of social insurance resources. Health care experts may trust that keeping patients in the healing facility when intense care is no longer medically important damages their expert uprightness (Bruce,

A tiny measure of patients deny care from the earliest starting point, having been conveyed to the healing center without wanting to by law implementation faculty or prehospital care suppliers (West Publishing Company , 2008). Despite the conditions under which the patient arrives, a choice to leave the crisis office against therapeutic counsel places work force in an unbalanced bind, constraining attendants and doctors to pick one of two choices which incorporate permitting the patient to leave, or they can control him and compel him to acknowledge treatment. Like most choices made in the crisis situation region, this one must be made in a flash.

State of Minnesota - USA Project type: e-Commerce marketplace Project name: The Affordable Care Act - MNsure Date: Jan 2014 Cost: In the region of $150M USD

How would you feel if you went to the hospital and the staff treated you differently because of the way you looked or your social status? The phrase "everyone should be treated equally" is often easier said than done. Especially in the healthcare field, this is often a topic of interest. Healthcare providers are suppose to treat every patient that enters the hospital the same no matter the patient 's race, religion, social class, and ethnical background. However, there are often many variables that hinder physicians from treating every patient the same such as legal factors and sometimes personal biases.