Accepting Incentives For Charity

One of the points that was brought up was that donating may potentially cause suffering to one’s self as they work hard for their money. They work hard and strive for what they want (affluence). Working a full time job in order to be broke, unhappy, and struggling like those in Bengal, for example, would be a disgrace and disappointing. Not only that, but people will also bring up the fact that if not everyone in society or in the world donates and gets away with not feeling guilty, so why should they feel obligated to so and contribute their efforts towards something that doesn’t directly affect

The second alternative solution is a reward system of organ donation. People that donate organs could receive money in return for their donation. That money could either come from the recipient of the organ, or an established organization. A disadvantage to a reward system of organ donation is that, people would be donating organs for the extrinsic value of the act, instead of doing it to help the greater good of someone else. Another problem that could arise is that, people would begin to feel entitled to receiving an organ if they are wealthy or come from a high level of society. On the other hand, an advantage could be that, more people would begin to donate organs if they knew that they would be receiving something in return.

No one wants to voluntarily sign up for an unnecessary surgery, which is why there is a five to ten year wait limit for an organ donation. The New York Times Article “Test Incentives for Organ Donations – There’s No Reason Not To,” written by Sally Satel, states that in order to raise the number of donations, people should be rewarded (Satel). Based on the statistics Satel provides, she says altruism is not producing enough donations. Instead, she believes the government should offer some form of incentive to lure people into doing a good deed (Satel). Satel’s article does develop solid points to teach readers about her topic effectively while simultaneously providing evidence to endorse her argument. She gets her purpose across by

The benefits of a corporate charitable giving program are not limited just to external results: Employee Engagement: Recruiting excellent performing employees and keeping them happy is a priority of all thriving corporations. Charitable giving improves employee engagement by boosting productivity, ethical behavior, gratitude to the organization, and pride in their work.

The ethics behind offering incentives for charitable acts are essentially righteous. The news of bonus points or a federal tax deduction will not only give people an incentive to do charity work, but also gather a larger group of people in doing so. For example, high schools often have fundraisers to help raise money for children in need or for their own school. Regardless the cause, when it comes to rallying students: incentives are usually involved. These incentives include stickers, t-shirts with the charity logo, or a chance to win a raffle. These small freebies are usually not the reason why the kids stay after school to clean up their cafeteria after a fundraiser or why kids participate in them. Students go because they are interested in the cause and enjoy

Thoreau makes some very valid points about philanthropy. As he notes, our selfishness plays a very large role in philanthropy. “And it is our selfishness that overrates it.” (Thoreau, 1962, p. 170) By this, Thoreau means that it is our motives that make philanthropy overrated. If people are raising money for a good cause, are they really doing it for the cause or are they doing it for themselves? While there is no doubt that some people are truly touched by the causes for which they aim to aid, many are simply using the cause to make themselves feel less selfish. What better way to prove that you are selfless than to raise money

Kidneys are one of the most needed organs for transplant, but the National Kidney Foundation opposes the idea of allowing compensation for kidney transplant donors. Like many others who oppose the idea, the Foundation believes that "any attempt to assign a monetary value to the human body, or body parts, either arbitrarily, or through market forces, diminishes human dignity." ("Financial Incentives") Offering money for organs can also be seen as a way to compel the poor to sell their organs; tempting those in dire economic straits to sell off of parts of their body in exchange for the much needed money. And the offer of money for organs may not even solve the problem. A

First of all, by compensating people for their organ donations, it would increase the number of lives saved. The current approach to obtaining organs is through volunteerism of live donors and altruism of deceased donors families. Altruistic consent for donation has not been adequate to meet the demands of those who are in need. The amount of individuals in need of a life saving organ is far greater than the amount donated annually. “If we keep thinking of organs solely as gifts, there will never be enough of them. We need to encourage more living and posthumous donation through rewards, say, tax credits or lifetime health insurance.”(226) If a financial incentive was offered for organs, like there is with egg donations for example, then more people would donate if they had more to gain.

I believe you make several valid points it’s not always just about looking good in the public eye, sometimes it’s just the right thing to do. I also believe that people take for granted the people involved with performing the volunteer duties and the personal benefits that they receive from doing a positive acts of kindness. This could also contribute to a company’s wellbeing policy that can greatly effect productivity and general happiness within an organization. In the end it’s a great gesture that effects all many people both within the organization and within the community that these organization conduct business.

It would be a perfect world if every adult wanted to give back and be a volunteer. Realistically, thats not the case. If everybody was forced to, that would lessen the point of service. The reason why volunteering is such a great thing is because it isn`t mandatory. If people want to volunteer,they do it to help others. There isn`t a financial gain or a law requring them to do so. If their hearts aren`t in it, then

Additionally, being given something can make individuals feel like a worthy part of the community. Indeed, I hope to gain by completing this project is that the gratification of assisting individuals such as children to bring joy into their lives with donations. Furthermore, I hope to gain by completing this project is that to implement ways to get involved and help the community.

I didn’t truly understand it at the time, but as I grow older and mature I am beginning to understand more and more. Also, in that same conversation, my father told me about some of the people he works with and works for, and how they give back but often only in the spotlight. They will donate money when the attention is on them, or they will do charity events when the media is involved. Looking back at it, this is a very selfish idea. When do we hit that point in our life where we are so selfish that we can not help others; is it a conscious decision or are we just not aware of our actions? I have seen this same of idea of selfishness in my own experiences. I went to a very wealthy private school, with many students coming very wealthy families. Often these families would donate money to the school, but in return they expected a plaque or they expected something to be named after them, some kind of recognition. Some people will say this is not selfish because they are giving back; however, others will say this is a selfish action because they are only giving looking for a return.

In today's modern society many students in preparatory school such as high schools and junior high schools are now requiring students to do “donate” their time to volunteer work or community service. These preparatory schools are doing this now in hopes that it helps prepare the young adults for the “real world” where the teenagers will have

Why do people who have money feel inclined to give it away? Throughout history, reasons for philanthropy have ranged from guilt to concern for personal image, from religious principles to simple generosity. America is awash with corporate CEO’s who have so much money that they could never spend it in a lifetime. What is pocket change to them could save thousands of lives in a third-world country. And yet only some of them choose to give their money away. Even then some of the ones who do are not charitable out of the goodness of their heart but do it purely to make themselves look better in the eyes of the public.

There are many ways that parents use to motivate their kids. Parents paying their children for good grades is tradition for many families in the United States. It is a simple as $5 per A. In fact, the American Institute of CPA conducted a study on children and money and found that 48% of parents paid their children for good grades. That is nearly half of parents in the United States. If all these parents do it, why shouldn’t you? Even though 48% of parents use this technique, you need to find a new way. Rewarding your child with money for good grades is a technique you should not use.