preview

According To Nuyen's The Mandate Of Heaven

Decent Essays
Open Document

The Mandate of Heaven is the ancient Chinese belief and political idea that heaven appoints a moral person to rule the empire who is qualified based on their ability to govern the people. According to Andrea and Overfield, “The Mandate of Heaven was a political-social philosophy that served as the basic Chinese explanation for the success and failure of monarchs and states down to the end of the empire…” (p. 1). Basically, the authors are saying that the Mandate of Heaven depends on whether an emperor is morally sufficient to rule the empire. If an emperor cannot fulfill his people’s need, he then loses his Mandate to rule. The Heaven would then transfer to another person who would rule the best. When the monarch loses his Mandate, the rebellions from inside the empire and outside the empire will attack their Kingdom. If the empire loses in the battle, people would then think the ruler has lost his morality and Mandate to rule. Therefore, considered as the renewal of a monarch and empire. …show more content…

The overthrow of a monarch from his power indicate that a monarch had lost his Mandate to rule the Kingdom. According to Nuyen, although Heaven does not speak whether a ruler lost his mandate or not, the Heaven’ will can be identified by the welfare of the people. Nuyen also states, “The people are, or their welfare is, the reason why (the ration) a ruler is fit or unfit to rule, and it is through them, or through how they fare in life, that it is known if someone has or has lost the Mandate to rule” (p. 122). The ancient Chinese believed that the signs of the ruler lost his Mandate to rule are such as peasant revolt, invader attack empire, and natural disasters like floods, earthquake, etc. Therefore, the Heaven assigns a new ruler who will rule the best in order to stop such difficulties and problems that they encounter in the

Get Access