According to Community Science Action Guides, nuclear power plants are cheaper to run, require

Nuclear energy is the world's largest source of emission-free energy. Nuclear power plants produce no controlled air pollutants, such as sulfur and particulates, or greenhouse gases. "Renewables" like solar, wind and biomass can help. But only nuclear power offers clean, environmentally friendly energy on a massive scale. The use of nuclear energy in place of other energy sources helps to keep the air clean, preserve the Earth's climate, avoid ground-level ozone formation and prevent acid rain. “Currently, there are 103 commercial nuclear power plants producing electricity in the United States, located at 64 sites in 31 states. They are, on average, 24 years old, and

•     Waste from nuclear energy stays radioactive for thousands of years. Great care has to be taken in storing this waste safely.

The use of nuclear power can have several negative impacts on the economy. The use of nuclear power can be costly. The building of the plants can cost between $12 - $18

The United States should use nuclear energy to help supplement energy demand because it’s cost-effective, safer for the environment, and a more reliable source of energy than any of the other types of fuel. Some of the topics of interest are cost-effectiveness, recycling options, long term storage options, environmental protection technologies currently being used, and a breakdown of how nuclear energy out performs other sources of power year round.

Throughout this world, we use various equipment that need certain energy requirements in order for them to run properly. Two of the utmost imperative sources of energy in our world today come from coal and nuclear power. Still, a great deal of citizens of this world are unaware of the impacts of nuclear power whether it be positive or negative due to the fact that nuclear power has not existed as long as coal power has. However, as nuclear power becomes a major resource of energy, we as citizens must determine which is more fitting for not only us, but our environment. As this report continues on, you will come to find the history of each of these resources along with the advantages and disadvantages of each. Concluded from this research was the concept that nuclear power is worthier for America as a whole. Included below are the specific points as to why nuclear power is far superior for American citizens and our environment. However, the main notion to be taken from this report is the view that we need to become further educated on the energy resources present in this world and be able to determine how we can become more efficient and contribute less to climate change in the long run.

The first advantage of nuclear energy is that it is one of the cleanest sources of energy available to us now. The process of fission doesn’t emit any greenhouse gases or emissions that are linked to global warming. Nuclear energy is currently the largest clean air energy source. It currently occupies 63.3 percent of the emission free electricity in the United States, and this must continue to get expanded upon. With increased use of nuclear energy comes a decreased use in fossil fuels, which would result in a lower carbon footprint for the U.S. This would help slow down the impact of global warming and climate change.

The nuclear energy institute refers to nuclear energy as “the most 'eco-efficient' of all energy sources because it produces the most electricity in relation to its minimal environmental impact.” Nuclear energy created electricity without burning anything and is therefore emission-free. The areas around nuclear power plants and their cooling ponds are so clean, they are often developed as wetlands that provide nesting areas for waterfowl and other birds, new habitats for fish, and the preservation of other wildlife as well as trees, flowers, and grasses not to mention the amount of actual land a nuclear power plant uses in relation to the amount of

Nuclear power plants have many advantages and disadvantages that must be weighed when comparing it to

Nuclear power plants are a safe, clean and reliable source of energy production. They are uniquely qualified to meet the growing demand for energy in the USA.

The advantage of of Nuclear Power is that it doesn’t depend on fossil fuels and is not affected by the erratic oil and gas prices. Coal and natural gas in other power plants emit carbon dioxide, whereas nuclear power plants emit minimal carbon dioxide. Nuclear fission produces a million times more energy per unit weight than fossil fuel alternatives.

Nuclear power also has a lot fewer greenhouse emissions. It has been determined that the amount of greenhouse gases have decreased by almost half because of the prevalence in the utilization of nuclear power. Nuclear energy has the least effect on nature since it doesn’t discharge any gasses like methane and carbon dioxide, which are the primary “greenhouse gasses” ("Pros and Cons of Nuclear Energy."). So, nuclear power is the cheapest source of electricity and produces the smallest amount of pollution than any other source of energy. But there's even more pros about nuclear energy. It is the most reliable source of energy. Solar energy is only good in sunny places, wind energy is only good in windy places, geothermal energy can only conduct electricity where hot spots are located, and hydroelectric energy is produced by water turning turbines that produce electricity. Nuclear energy can be conducted anywhere as long as there is enough space for the power plant to be

Renewability is another difference. Solar panels use the sun to produce power, so this source of energy is completely renewable. However, nuclear power use uranium that must be mined from the earth to make power; once this uranium is used, it will never grow back. The amount of land used also differs between the two. Solar power might not be the most environmentally friendly due to the vast amounts of land needed for solar farms. Nuclear power does not need as much land for nuclear reactors.

The US Department of Energy showed that 75 US nuclear reactors had initially had a budget of $45 billion, but ended up costing $145 billion. (“counterpoint: The Risks of Nuclear Power Outweigh the Benefits”) Another example of expensive nuclear plants would be that a study found that out of all nuclear plants in the world, 97% went over budget. Only 3% have been able to stay on budget, but probably because they had a very high budget, to begin with. Also, those power plants don’t get much income. “According to British Energy, a provision of 3 billion pounds invested at a return of just 3% per year…” (Buchan 2) All of this shows that nuclear power plants are too expensive to keep. They cost a lot of money and they have to spend money to make only 3%. 3 billion pounds for 3% back. I don’t think so. There are a lot more environmentally friendly ways to produce energy, other ways to make power and make more money and spend less money. This is an issue and governments must stop spending a lot of money on wasteful nuclear

As each year passes, more and more electricity will be made as a result of increased nuclear power plants around the world. The economic benefits of nuclear energy are equally advantageous as the environmental aspects.

The world's natural resources are being consumed at an alarming rate. As these resources diminish, people will be seeking alternative sources by which to generate electricity for heat and light. The only practical short-term solution for the energy/pollution crisis should be nuclear power because it is available, cleaner and safer.