Crystal Ziemer Professor Valenzuela ACCT 465 CASE 2 A. Basis of Accounting Both require an accrual accounting method and use historical cost basis for their accounting but IFRS allows revaluation to fair value in certain cases which is prohibited in GAAP. There was sufficient information provided to determine that conversion is required. He will have to figure out which accounting principles to use that are in accordance with IFRS. B. Cash and Cash Equivalents Under IFRS bank overdrafts can be included in cash and cash equivalents, this is not permitted under GAAP. Chris would have to find out if the bank overdrafts are ‘’repayable on demand that form an integral part of an entity’s cash management.’’ If they do then they would be under …show more content…
The amount of any reversal of any write-down of inventories, rising from an increase in net realizable value, shall be recognized as a reduction in the amount of inventories recognized as an expense in the period in which the reversal occurs.’’ Also required for IAS2.36 would be the disclosure of; • carrying amount of any inventories carried at fair value less costs to sell • amount of any write-down of inventories recognized as an expense in the period • amount of any reversal of a write-down to NRV and the circumstances that led to such reversal • carrying amount of inventories pledged as security for liabilities • cost of inventories recognized as expense (cost of goods sold) D. Property, Plant, and Equipment The company is currently using a cost method for property plant and equipment which can be moved over to IFRS without needing any conversion, or they could change to the revaluation model. Since revaluation is allowed under IFRS the company could choose to use this model. However, Chris would need to find this value at the date of revaluation less subsequent depreciation and impairment, provided that fair value can be measured reliably. He would also need to
Section 360-10-35-17 of the Code states that an impairment loss shall be recognized if the carrying value of a fixed asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The carrying value of the fixed asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and disposal of the asset. An impairment loss shall be measured by the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value.
The second way that Athina could have approached this issue is that Athina could have considered the write-off as an unusual or non-recurring item seeing as how the inventory-turned-obsolete was not something that happens regularly. In this case, by considering this event as unusual or non-recurring, there would have been no effect on the net income before unusual or non-recurring items.
* ASC 323-10-35: “A series of operating losses of an investee or other factors may indicate that a decrease in value of the investment has occurred that is other than temporary and that shall be recognized even though the decrease in value is in excess of what would otherwise be recognized by
ii. Reversing Entry that results in future deductible amounts and, therefore will usually give rise to a future income tax asset.
The concept of write-down inventory states that the value of inventory should appear in financial statements only if it has some value, which is equal to the difference between the current market replacement value and the original inventory cost. IAS 2 stipulates that loss on write down inventory if small should be reported as part of the cost of goods sold and if huge, it should be reported on a separate line on the income statement. It thus follows that exclusion of write-down inventory may lead to investor overestimation of earnings persistence thereby leading to ethical and financial implications. The ethical issues include loss of brand value and goodwill, concealment of fraud penalties, and loss of shareholder and investor confidence while financial implications may include excessive compensation of the management.
transferred under ITA 85 (1). However, the $18,500 loss would have to be treated as a capital
which they were incurred. During the carry-over period, the net capital losses can be deducted
cognizant of the fact that the choices he makes can affect the price a buyer pays
There are several differences between the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and the U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). The IFRS is considered more of a "principles based" accounting standard in contrast to U.S. GAAP which is considered more "rules based." By being more "principles based", IFRS, arguably, represents and captures the economics of a transaction better than U.S. GAAP. As a team me collaborated to answer the following seven questions.
If the costs on the leftover inventory have to be lowered, then the journal entry would need to show a “credit to the inventory account and a debit to the Decline in Cost Account” (Walther,
$8 mill needed to be deducted from net income on the income statement. They should have followed (Following) with disclosure notes to describe why this error occurred and how it impacted the statement and accounts that it touched. For instance, the notes would describe the presence of the correction on the current period of beginning inventory, and retainED earnings.
I would estimate the incremental cash flows over the economic life of the new machine, taking into consideration the after-tax salvage values of the old and new machine respectively. Changes in net working capital would be figured in as well. For the terminal year, we would assume that the net working capital is recovered and treat it as a cash inflow.
For asset impairment there are two major differences between IFRS and US GAAP. Under US GAAP there is a two-step approach applied when assessing for impairment. First, the carrying value of an asset is compared with the undiscounted value of the expected future cash flows that will be generated from the asset. Second, when the carrying value is higher the
Accrual basis accounting requires revenues to be reported when earned and expenses when incurred, regardless of the timing of cash receipts or payments. Accrual basis accounting is required under GAAP. Cash basis accounting reports revenues when cash is received and expenses when cash is paid. The cash basis accounting is not allowed under
* As we learned in class from reading Silic’s financial statements, 82.9% of the unrealized gains from revaluation will flow to the Revaluation Surplus account and 17.1% will flow to the Other Creditors account.