Accounting Scandal of Worldcom

As with Enron, the more that it was investigated the worse it became. There was fraudulent reporting on the balance sheet and income statement some that was found after the fact during the post-bankruptcy audit ( (Romar & Calkins, 2006). The total of the fraudulently report amounts was approximately $73.7 billion in overstated revenues and $5.8 billion in overstated assets for a total of $79.5 billion in overstatements in less than a two year period (Romar & Calkins, 2006). The biggest difference with WorldCom is that it restructured and was bought by

Phar-Mor, Inc. was a deep-discount store that had substantial growth in a short period of time. It started with 15 stores and grew to over 310 stores in thirty two states between 1985 and 1992. At first Phar-Mor was seen as a major prospect in the retail market. With sales of over $3 billion and growing, Phar-Mor's success even worried some of the biggest retail giant, including Wal-mart. The president, founder, and COO of Phar-Mor was Mickey Monus, who became quite extravagant with his money as Phar-Mor grew. The key to the company's success was "power buying" a phrase coined by Mr. Monus, it was a practice of stocking up on products when suppliers where offering rock-bottom prices. After using this "power buying" strategy

The stakeholders in this fraudulent case of WorldCom consist of Bernie Ebbers, Scott Sullivan, Buford Yates, David Myers, Cynthia Cooper, and Betty Vinson belong to the company. While the other stakeholders would consist of the creditors, Andersen (accounting firm), investors, and the public. This fraudulent act committed within WorldCom impacted every single stakeholder in a way. Either in a negative or positive way, most of the impact was caused with harm to everyone. The main individuals such as Ebbers, Sullivan, and Vinson all had major consequences as resulting with the fraud. Criminal trials were a major result with their fraudulent acts within WorldCom. Cooper was a lifesaver by most of the community. Aside from these individuals, the rest also got affected by the fraud. Investments conducted by the investors were all lost within the fraud process. The impact towards much of the image for Andersen was ruined. Many of the public lost their trust on the honesty and professionalism of Andersen and other certified public accounting firms. The entire employees from the top management to the smaller group of workers stayed unemployed and some with criminal punishment.

Deception, whether intentional or not, did occur. The shareholders had a right to know the financial state of WorldCom. In Ebber’s defense, he had unscrupulous bed fellows on this board. Their intentions are also at question especially regarding their eagerness to grant Mr. Ebbers a breathtaking loan for $341 million dollar at an interest rate of 2% to shield the instability of the company’s financial situation from shareholders. There were also some concerns whether such loans were ethical from the Security Exchange Commission Enforcement official Seth Taube. He stated that large loans to senior executives are commonly sweetheart deals involving interest rates that constitute a poor return on company assets. Federal prosecutors in New York cited Ebbers 's expensive lifestyle, and his overspending, as a motive to hide WorldCom 's mounting financial troubles. The impropriety associated with the largest loan any publicly traded company has lent to one of its officers in recent memory is evident. Unfortunately, if Ebbers had pressed the matter and sold his stock, he would have escaped the bankruptcy financially whole, but Ebbers honestly thought WorldCom would recover.”

Therefore, the company utilized 4.37% of its assets in 2000, but decreased to 1.48% in 2001 to earn net income of $4,153,000,000 and $1,501,000,000 respectively. The 2.89% decrease between the two years shows that the company did not utilize its assets as effectively as they could have (WorldCom 10-K 2002) (Rufus, Miller, & Hahn 2015) (Sherman 2016).

WorldCom and The Mississippi Scheme are both large financial scandals that have occurred. WorldCom was a telecommunication company that overstated their cash flow by reporting $7.6 billion in operating expenses as capital expenses. WorldCom is the largest accounting scandal in US history as of March 2002. The Mississippi Scheme was a business scheme that destroyed the economy of France during the 1700’s. The scheme involved the loss of paper money’s purchasing power as a result of asset inflation. Both WorldCom and The Mississippi Scheme were frauds involving manipulation to create higher stock prices and dubious practices within the organizations to keep the public unaware.

Andersen’s reputation was so tarnished from the revelations of the conspiracy that no public company would have Arthur Andersen as an auditor. Andersen's practice was disbanded and has now become defunct with only a handful of employees still working for the firm as they continue to wind down the business. In July of 2002, not long after the exposure of the Enron accounting fraud and bankruptcy, WorldCom Inc. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. WorldCom Inc. admitted that the company had fraudulently misclassified over $3.8 billion in payments for line costs as capital expenditures rather than current expenses (Beresford). The company’s executives perpetrated this fraud, grossly overstating revenues by improperly transferring billions of dollars in line cost expenses to asset accounts over a number of years. These transfers reduced WorldCom’s reported line costs and increased pre-tax income by $7 billion overall (Beresford).

the lines at a higher price. Under GAAP, these costs should have been reported as an

Before 2002, WorldCom was one of the top telecommunication businesses in its industry because of many acquisitions obtained by the company. Due to the increased popularity of the internet and the acquirement of UUNet and MCI

On March 15, 2005 former CEO of WorldCom, Bernard Ebbers sat in a federal courtroom waiting for the verdict. As the former CEO of WorldCom, Ebbers was accused of being personally responsible for the financial destruction of the communications giant. An internal investigation had uncovered $11 billion dollars in fraudulent accounting practices. Later a second report in 2003 found that during Ebber’s 2001 tenure as CEO, the company had over-reported earnings and understated expenses by an astonishing $74.5 billion dollars (Martin, 2005, para 3). This report included the mismanagement of funds, unethical lending practices among its top executives, and false bookkeeping which led to loss of tens of thousands of its employees.

WorldCom was the ultimate success story among telecommunications companies. Bernard Ebbers took the reigns as CEO in 1985 and turned the company into a highly profitable one, at least on the outside. In 2002, Ebbers resigned, WorldCom admitted fraud and the company declared bankruptcy (Noe, Hollenbeck, Gerhart, &Wright 2007). The company was at the heart of one of the biggest accounting frauds seen in the United States. The demise of this telecommunications monster can be accredited to many factors including their aggressive-defensive organizational culture based on power and the bullying tactics that they employed. However, this fiasco could have been prevented if WorldCom had designed a system of checks and balances that would have

From the time of WorldCom’s inception there always seemed to be a tradition in management as if the company was only 100 or so employees. There was a “good old boys” mentality among the limited few running the company and if you were outside that circle then were told only what they wanted you to hear. An unspoken rule among employees was to do what you were told without questions or risk the consequences. One example of this situation occurred when senior management member Gene Morse told an employee “If you show those damn numbers to the f****ing auditors, I’ll throw you out the window” (Kaplan, R.S., & Kiron, D., 2007, p. 3).WorldCom showed no concern regarding an employee’s need and obligation to voice concerns on matters related

Cable provider Adelphia was one of the major accounting scandals of the early 2000s that led to the creation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. A key provision of the Act was to create a stronger ethical climate in the auditing profession, a consequence of the apparent role that auditors played in some of the scandals. SOX mandated that auditors cannot audit the same companies for which they provide consulting services, as this link was perceived to result in audit teams being pressured to perform lax audits in order to secure more consulting business from the clients. There were other provisions in SOX that increased the regulatory burden on the auditing profession in response to lax auditing practices in scandals like Adelphia (McConnell & Banks, 2003). This paper will address the Adelphia scandal as it relates to the auditors, and the deontological ethics of the situation.

A multitude of choices made by executives at WorldCom led to the ultimate demise of the company as it was previously known, the employees and their livelihoods’, and the trust of the American people. In a time when corporations fail to set ethical standards and provide transparency to investors, how do we change corporate culture on a national level? By analyzing choices made to improve stock prices and company image that ultimately result in failure-- we can guide

WorldCom was once the second largest telecommunication company in the United States. Currently, the company is known for its enormous accounting scandal from 2002, which led to the company filing for bankruptcy protection. WorldCom executives were able to falsify the company’s accounting figures by inflating the company’s assets by almost $13-billion dollars. The fallout after the company filed for bankruptcy led to huge losses for investors, but also for employees and retailers. The scandal is one of the worst corporate accounting crimes in U.S. history, leading to some of its former executives held personally responsible. WorldCom executives instructed accountants to inflate assets by as much as $11 billion dollars, which led to 30,000 in layoffs and a loss of about $180 billion for its investors.