Accounting Standard in Bangladesh

The information in this report regarding the accounting standards for private companies is as stated in the proposal stage. The three options discussed are options being considered and the Accounting Standards Board (AcSB) has issued an

Note: General Note The Status Section identifies changes to this Subtopic resulting from Accounting Standards Updates. The Section provides references to the affected Codification content and links to the related Accounting Standards Updates. Nonsubstantive changes for items such as editorial, link and similar corrections are included separately in Maintenance Updates.

In 1973 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) was established to set the financial accounting standards in the United States of America for nongovernmental entities. These standards are collectively called U.S. Generally accepted Accounting Principles, or U.S. GAAP. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants acknowledge the authority of these standards (FASB, n.d). A “proven, independent due process” is used to collect the viewpoints of the financial statements prepares and users for the constant improvement of these standards. An Accounting Status Update(ASU) is not an authoritative source however documents the amendments to communicate the changes in the FASB Codification for a user to understand the reason and future of those changes (FASB, n.d).

Other accounting literature, including GASB Concepts Statements; pronouncements in categories (a) through (d) of the hierarchy for nongovernmental entities when not specifically made applicable to state and local governments; FASB Concepts Statements; FASAB Statements, Interpretations, and Technical Bulletins, AICPA Issues Papers; International Accounting Standards Committee Statements, pronouncements of other professional associations or regulatory agencies; AICPA Technical Practice Aids; and accounting textbooks, handbooks, or articles.

generally accepted accounting standards for private-sector entities, including businesses and not-for-profit organizations. A recognized expert in forensic accounting, Mr. Siegel has 17 years of experience in diverse and global industries that include technology, media, telecommunications, healthcare, retail, and insurance. Prior to his appointment to the FASB, he led the Accounting Research and Analysis team at the RiskMetrics Group in Rockville, Maryland (FASB.org, 2009f).

In May 2008, the AICPA’s Governing Council designated the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) as the body authorized to establish international financial accounting and reporting principles under rule 202 and 203 of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct. Below is an illustrative Independent Auditor’s Report on financial statements issued in conformity with IFRS.

The field of accounting is constantly evolving. This is true not only for the theory of accounting itself but also the entities that govern its theory and practice. Presently, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) are faced with some of the biggest challenges to date. To understand the significance of these two boards, it is necessary to understand their histories, relations between the boards, and the standards that they set. Also how the knowledge of these boards and the field they lead, gained through the masters of science in accountancy

The GASB Statement No. 56 was initiated on April 16, 2009. The essence of the new ruling aims to integrate the accounting and financial guidelines of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) with the GASB’s accounting procedures that concern the state and local government (“New Release,” 2009; “Statement No. 56,” 2009; “Summary of Statement No. 56,” n.d). The statement does not create new financial reporting guidelines or requirements nor imply amendments to the current policies. Rather, it “relocates the existing” guidelines from the “professional auditing standards (“Statement No. 56,” 2009, p. 11). There are three major areas that are taken into consideration, namely “related party transactions, “going concern” attributes

There are three kind of financial statements for companies which the content reflected different information. Among them, the first is the balance sheet, this statement reflects the financial situation of enterprises. For example, some of the listed companies wants to reflect good financial position in the statement, they will want to increase total assets, decrease accrued total liabilities, and then of course increase owners ' equity, making investors mistakenly believe the company has great investment value, thereby misleading public opinion and investors. Beside the balance sheet the other two financial statements are the income statement and cash flow statement. These two statements reflect the business situation of enterprises. The income statement is an important indicator to measure the performance of listed companies, it is closely related to the allotment and the profit. Therefore, in order to increase the profits of listed companies, they will have to Increase revenue, earnings, decrease expenses, costs and losses (Temte, 73). It helped increase tax evasion, embezzlement and other economic criminal activities. A large number of cases being investigated, all related to the accountants making the fake accounting entries. Therefore, the accounting credibility loss has restricted the development of the market economy. In a business, accountant often times handle the tax problem, so if

Fast forward to 1970, where the APB’s main contribution “Basic Concepts and Accounting Principles Underlying Financial Statement of Business Enterprises was highly critized for achieving too little too late. Ultimately, resulting in the AICPA suggesting that the standard setting role be turned over to an autonomous body known as the Financial Accounting Standards Board

The Codification’s goal is to clarify the company of thousands of U.S. authoritative accounting announcements published by diverse standard-setters. Therefore, to accomplish this objective, the FASB sponsored a project to incorporate and typically adapt all related accounting publication announced by the standard-setters of the U.S. in conjunction with those of the FASB, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants

However, this Statement maintains the scope of Interpretation 46(R) with the previous additional entities treated as special qualifying entities for purposes. The concept of these entities was eliminated in Statement No. 166. Therefore, the statement No. 167 also superseded the risks of quantitative-based and calculation of rewards to determine which enterprise, if any, provided a financial interest that controls an entity variable interest because the expectation of an access of the basic qualitative will be more efficient to identify which company has a financial interest of controlling in an entity variable interest. However, this is the way the FASB admitted to upgrade the financial reporting standards. Other additional necessity is an additional review event when deciding whether a company is a variable entity interest when there are any occurring circumstances and changes in facts. For instinct, the owner of the equity investment at risk, as a group, lose the power from voting rights to direct the activities of the entity that some characteristic impacts the economic entity’s performance. There will also be ongoing assessments of whether an enterprise is the key beneficiary of a variable interest entity.

According to the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB), general capital assets are required to be recorded at historical cost. If the cost of the capital asset is unknown, then an estimated cost can be used. Also if the cost of a capital asset are donated, they are recorded at their fair value at the time of receipt, plus ancillary charges.

The Big Eight firm partners had called on their offices around the world to draft chapters that included sections on the organized accountancy profession, auditing standards, and accounting principles and practices. It was the first such volume to be produced by a professional accountancy body. In its Introduction, the committee referred to the demands for 'improvement and greater uniformity in international accounting and professional standards ... which were voiced by many participants in the Eighth International Congress held in New York in September 1962'.?

The accounting world is shaped by stringent and clear rules, principles, standards and guidelines. These are all meant to define accounting operations and reporting discipline. With the emergence of International Accounting Standards (IAS), which was later replaced by International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), the accounting concepts, analysis, disclosures, reporting and presentation became easier and practical. Currently, accountants, managers and related parties find it concrete and consistent in protecting professional boundaries.