Accounting Standards Codification ( Asc )

The company’s leverage ratio is 28% - 72% of its assets are financed by common equity and the company was profitable in the last reporting period. The company should easily raise additional funds from creditors and a convertible debenture will be an appealing venture for creditors who would want to purchase stocks of the company in the future.

Convertible debts are long-term securities which can be converted into issuer 's stock options at a specified conversion ratio, if the debt-holder wants to exercise them. Convertibles include bonds and preferred shares, but most commonly take the form of bonds. Convertible bonds are a type of compound financial instrument with characteristics of both liability and equity.

o Cost of debt in this case is 12.5% though MCI can raise $ 100 million more with this option in comparison to option (a) above. Servicing this debt would be a significant drain on the cash flow. o Please see Exhibit 3. (c) $600 million Convertible offering @ 7.625% 20 year with conversion at 54 per share o Using this option MCI can raise $ 100 million more than option (b) at 4.88% lower rate of interest. It also gives MCI an option to convert it to equity once the stock price reaches 54 (it is currently 47). Based on previous convertible offerings (As per exhibit 6 of case, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981 and 1982), MCI has been converting it to equity within 18 months because of its high growth. As higher growth is projected for the next few years (Exhibit 9 of case), MCI is expected to convert this $600 million offering to equity, thereby reducing its leverage. o This option allows to finance its current activities and match capital inflows with expected investment outlays in the near future. It also allows MCI the option to eliminate the cash flow drain from servicing the debt once the stock price increases. o As per Exhibit 3 attached here, this offering will provide capital to meet the external financing needs for 1983.

7. If a convertible bond has a conversion price that is set in reference to the fair market value of shares on the conversion date, then the bond is classified entirely as debt. No (price) risk or reward is transferred to the investor and therefore there is no equity element.

The purpose of this research paper is to summarize research on codification topic 410 based on the information found in different academic databases. The first part of the paper will focus on the FASB Codification database. The second part of the paper will compare and contrast three other databases on the same codification 410 within the RIA Checkpoint databases: AICPA: Auditing and Accounting Guides, SOX Reporter, and GAAP Practice Manual. A summary of benefits and issues with the searches of each database will also be discussed.

Entity-wide disclosures are required under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 280-10-50-40 through 280-10-50-42. The disclosures are required because every corporation does not report information in a similar fashion, and the disclosures would provide comparability of the financial statements among entities. For example, if a corporation uses a geographic approach in its financial statements, disclosing certain information about the products or services sold will make comparability to other companies much easier. The disclosures will also help with comparability within an entity if they decide to choose another method of reporting operating segments in the future. There are three types of entity-wide disclosures; products and services, geographic areas, and/or major customers. Every public company has to comply with the disclosures, even if the company has one reportable segment. The only exception to the entity-wide disclosures is if it is impractical to provide the information, such as it would be extremely costly to the corporation, or if the “internal reporting systems are not capable of gathering financial information by product or service by geographic area.” A disclosure should be made when entity-wide disclosures are impractical.

ASC 480-10-15-3 Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity applies because the preferred shares has “characteristics of both a liability and equity and, in some circumstances, also has characteristics of an asset (for example, a forward contract to purchase the issuer’s equity shares that is to be net cash settled).” Also ASC 480-10-25-4 states “mandatorily redeemable financial instrument shall be classified as a liability unless the redemption is required to occur only upon the liquidation or termination of the reporting entity.” The Shares are not considered mandatorily redeemable at issuance according to ASC 480-10-25-7, “If a financial instrument will be redeemed only upon the occurrence of a conditional event, redemption of that instrument is conditional and, therefore, the instrument does not meet the definition of mandatorily redeemable financial instrument in this Subtopic.” The Shares will be redeemed only upon the occurance of the Contingent Redemption Rights, so the Shares again are not considered mandatorily redeemable financial instruments meaning it is not classified as a liability. Since it is not certain that the Company will not receive FDA approval at issuance, the preferred stock can be considered equity. If by the fifth year the FDA does not approve the product, the Company will have to reclassify the Shares from equity to a liability. This is shown according to the second

Even if uniformity were to be reached, the IOSCO disclosure standards do not encircle all of the information required of an easy access to cross-border capital markets.

330-10-35-1 A departure from the cost basis of pricing the inventory is required when the utility of the goods is no longer as great as their cost. Where there is evidence that the utility of goods, in their disposal in the ordinary course of business, will be less than cost

(3) Section 351 (g) provides that debt instruments or nonqualified preferred stock do not qualify for section 351 treatment. In our case, the stocks transferors received are common stocks. Therefore, it qualifies for section 351 treatment with this respect.

Inventories, is similar to the US GAAP definition under Accounting Standards Codification, ASC 330. According to Ernst & Young (2013) article, they are both based on the principle that the primary basis of accounting for inventory is cost. Both define inventory as assets held for sale in the ordinary course of business, in the process of production for such sale or to be consumed in the production of goods or services (pg.71). This which lead to the entries above. Under U.S. GAAP, the company reports inventory on the balance sheet at the lower of expense or market, where business sector is characterized as replacement cost of$180,000, with net realizable value of $190,000 and net realizable value less a normal profit of $152,000. In this case, stock was composed down to replacement cost and provided details regarding the December 31, 2014 asset report at $180,000. A $70,000 loss was incorporated into 2014 income. The company would report inventory on the balance sheet at the lower of cost $250,000 as historical cost and net realizable value as $190,000. Inventory would have been accounted for on the December 31, 2014 asset report a net realizable estimation of $190,000 and a loss on write-down of inventory of $60,000 (the historical cost subtracted from net realizable expense) would have been reflected in net income. IFRS income would be $10,000 bigger than U.S. GAAP net pay. IFRS held earnings would bigger by the same amount.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) writes the code that directs certified public accountants and accounting professionals in non-governmental environments. On occasions, the FASB proposes changes to those accounting standards. This process includes exposure drafts. The issuance of exposure drafts is for individual and business comments. The input from the respondents in comment letters is analyzed and considered by the board in the deliberations regarding the issue. "Proposed Accounting Standards Update – Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205): Reporting Discontinued Operations," published on April 2, 2013, discusses changing the reports to be more useful and reduce costs for preparers. This report will discuss the exposure draft in depth and the comment letters accordingly.

There are two main characteristics of the Series B Preferred Stock that behave like equity- the voting rights and conversion option. The host contract gives voting rights- which behave like equity. While voting rights fall into the equity category, these are not full voting rights. The voting rights allow the Series B preferred stockholders to vote with common stockholders only for significant events. These voting rights are therefore not full voting rights which means this characteristic is not given its full weight as being toward equity. The conversion option shows signs of equity; however, it also shows signs of debt. Since the conversion option is weighted equally for equity and debt, it essentially cancels itself in determining whether the host contract is debt or equity.

The advantage to choosing a convertible bond for financing is that "they provide issuers with ‘cheap' debt and allow them to sell equity at a premium over current value". Jen, Choi, Lee (1997).

First, The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issues The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) on U.S securities and exchange companies listed.