Acct 554 Amendment 1

The 14th amendment deals with equal protection to all citizens of the United States of America. All citizens are guaranteed their civil liberties, whether it's freedom of speech, religion, expression, right to bear arms, protection of the accused, etc; however, in the last couple decades, one of these rights has been a huge issue among the U.S. Government and citizens. The debate over the right to bear arms is not one-sided and has caused controversy throughout the years with many court cases, conspiracy theories and public outrage.

The basis of criminal justice in the United States is one founded on both the rights of the individual and the democratic order of the people. Evinced through the myriad forms whereby liberty and equity marry into the mores of society to form the ethos of a people. However, these two systems of justice are rife with conflicts too. With the challenges of determining prevailing worth in public order and individual rights coming down to the best service of justice for society. Bearing a perpetual eye to their manifestations by the truth of how "the trade-off between freedom and security, so often proposed so seductively, very often leads to the loss of both" (Hitchens, 2003, para. 5).

This discussion addressed the 2nd amendment in relation to the 21st century. Considering the most recent attacks on society, this issue is being highly addressed throughout America, and this discussion follows just that. Throughout this event, the speakers analyze the words behind the 2nd amendment, described the increase in police brutality in relationship to guns, and illustrates the connection guns have in history.

Policing methods have unequivocally expanded throughout the years with several different amendments from the U.S. Constitution like the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendment. Through these amendments, many speculate if expanding law enforcement methods are bypassing the rights of the U.S. Constitution.

Leading U.S. supreme court cases in criminal justice: Briefs and key terms is a source reference with respect to criminal law, constitutional law, and criminal procedure. The major focus of this book includes explained mandates of over 1000 U.S. Supreme Court cases and this book details key terms and definitions.

In the second amendment, passed in 1791, by James Madison, the people are given the right to bare arms. The right was established to allow the citizens to feel stable and secure. Had a war arisen or a tyrant gained control, the people would not be left defenseless. However, the core purpose of this amendment has been altered through time. Now and days, guns have become a large issue led by debate/ They are being used to unlawfully kill, and have essentially become a threat. However, some people still feel the need to have possession of a gun for protection. Being able to bare arms is still positive because it still allows a sense of security for citizens.

The Declaration of Independence expressed the concern that the military was an entity superior to civilians. The document asserts that King George III made the “Military independent of and superior to Civil power”. Complementing, It also expresses the concern of militia receiving trials in favor of them and reduced punishments when committing crimes to civilians of America. The Constitution addresses the concern of judicial bias for the military in Article 3. Section 2. It enacts that judicial power shall “extend to all cases, in Law and Equity”. Although this section of the Constitution does not explicitly mention the military, the concern of partiality in courts and the law is addressed. The Bill of Rights further addresses the problem of military superiority over civilians. In the second Amendment, it states that as an army is required to defend the country, civilians are given the right to bear arms in order to fight against a military power that stands to threaten them. The fifth Amendment establishes that a soldier cannot arrest a civilian without formal procedure. The Constitution fully addresses the concerns of military superiority threatening civilian

The Second Amendment to the Constitution gave United States citizens the right to bear arms. Although, the Second Amendment stated: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms. However, the framers could not foresee the type of violence we have in our cities today. Innocent citizens have and are being brutally killed due to this amendment. Stricter gun control laws must be enacted to receive these types of weapons.

One of the main powers law enforcement officers carry is the authority to make citizens involuntarily give up their rights. Most people when confronted by police get mild to moderate panic reaction, can become nervous or anxious, and do as much as possible to limit the time spent with the officer. Due to the difference in power between a citizen and a police officer, citizens often unknowingly, give up their constitutional rights when an officer acts tough or bullies them (Guidelines?1).

One of the amendments of the constitution is the right to bear arms. This allows many to protect themselves as well as defend against an abusive government. Many supporters of the second amendment believe that without the right to bear arms, the government would be free to control the

The United States Constitution is a social contract between the U.S. government and its citizens, which promises their [the citizens’] rights and liberties will be protected. The Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights states that every citizen has the Right to Bear Arms; moreover, it means that an individual has the right to defend him or herself from physical harm. States are passing Stand Your Ground laws, which are similar to the Castle Doctrine (one has the right to defend oneself in the confines of his or her home), but the Stand Your Ground laws extend the range; instead, people may defend themselves using deadly force in any area they are permitted access (Jealous, 2013; Cox, 2013; Moore, 2012). Stand Your Ground laws contain flaws wherein predators or vigilantes may twist the law to their benefit, yet the Stand Your Ground laws are meant to justify the deeds victims must perform in order to defend themselves. Stand Your Ground laws are beneficial through their fundamental purpose, but how defendants are abusing the laws and how critics claim that the presence of a gun influences the victim’s decisions during an attack are detrimental to the enhancement of the laws.

America has always prided itself on being the land of the free. Our national Constitution and Bill of Rights have ensured that the people of America maintain their basic rights. Nevertheless, many of the rights guaranteed in these historic documents are often the subject of heated debate. The right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee against self-incrimination, the First Amendment’s protection of speech and petitioning activity, all of these issues have been subject to contentious arguments in courts of law and the courts of public opinion. Of late, however, the most lengthy, argumentative and noisy debates have focused on gun control. Some people think that

Chapter 5 is the most important chapter for anyone who joins the law enforcement world. The chapter goes in depth of the policing legal aspects that anyone in the criminal justice system must know. Warren court was introduced as the ideology of offenders being protected by their individual rights. Warren Court believes it is best for the law enforcement to conduct their work by enforcing the law, however; the warren court believes individual rights is an important value. Furthermore, the chapter discusses the 4th Amendment’s definition and clauses. However, the consequence for law enforcement was not presented in the 4th Amendment. Many rules and doctrines were created to limit the corruption of law enforcement of over abusing the 4th Amendment.

On July 4, 1776, thirteen colonies declared independence from English rule, eventually forming the United States of America (“American History,” 2016). Built upon a unique platform of autonomy, the United States provides citizens with freedoms not present in other countries. In order to preserve such freedoms, the Constitution of the United States was enacted in 1797, outlining an array of rights and privileges afforded to all citizens of the country (“American History,” 2016). However, as in any society, crime and abuse pervaded the peace of the nation, continuing to date. Methods of public, social control span deep into the history of the United States, in an effort to combat wrongful, illicit activity, or crime. With the first official police force established in 1838, law enforcement has grown rapidly within the nation, employing millions (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2015). Nevertheless, with the evolution of law enforcement, crime and the American population have also evolved. In the present-day United States, fear and unrest regarding personal rights and freedoms are overwhelmingly prevalent, often creating controversy between the public and the police. Under democratically-inspired legal restraints, notably the Bill of Rights, the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution ensure the personal rights and freedoms of American citizens against certain police-related matters.

There are many challenges that law enforcement agencies faces when it comes to enforcing public safety at the same time protect the rights of individuals. This paper will focus on several key topics involving the relationship between public safety and individual rights. The first topic is the statutory authority and responsibilities of government officials, security personnel, and private citizens. The next topic involves the practices or laws relating to search, seizures, and surveillance by police, corrections, private citizens, and security personnel. This paper will also compare the laws relating to the use of