Act 15 And Galatians 2 Essay

Luke's account of Paul's mission spans much of the latter half of Acts 13-28, and more so in 13-20. In the course of that mission, Paul rises from Barnabas' junior colleague to a senior and veteran missionary. We also see Paul laboring in wider and wider spheres in the Eastern Mediterranean basin. It comes as something of a surprise, then, to see that activity grind to a halt in Acts 21-28. In these chapters, a sizable portion of the text of Acts, Paul is in captivity, his movements dictated by Roman officials.

From Chapter 6 - Paul defends his Gentile Mission - How is the issue of Jewish Christians eating meat related to Galatians 2:1-18 and Acts 15:1-35? What was the decision of the Jerusalem Council? Why is this important for Christians today?

The book of Acts brings out Paul as one of the most phenomenal apostles in the times post the death of Jesus. The documentation of Paul’s gospel begins with a mission by the leaders of the Antioch church who were instructed by the Holy Spirit to separate Barnabas and Saul from the Mission they were being sent on. During that period Saul was involved in the persecution and killing of believers of Christ and the instruction was a difficult trivia to the Christians due to the History associated with Saul. The conversion of Saul from a persecutor of Christians to an apostle spreading the Gospel is also a manifestation of the Holy Spirit (Keener & Craig,

The third issue Luther and Zwingli were at odds concerning is whether or not Christ is sitting at the right hand of God. Luther and Zwingli each looked at the idea of Christ sitting at the right hand of God from a different perspective. Luther looked from a figurative perspective and Zwingli from a literal perspective. Zwingli said since Christ has a human nature then one has to abide by that human nature, therefore Christ literally sits at the right hand of God in heaven. He believed the right hand of God to be a circumscribed place. Luther however heavily disagreed with Zwingli’s stance believing that Zwingli was giving too much power to the human nature separating the human from the divine nature of Christ. Luther said, “You must not believe

Nathaniel Hawthorne, as an admirer of psychology, uses a distinctive theme of moral ambiguity amongst his characters in the novel The Scarlet Letter. The characters, in particular Hester Prynne, Arthur Dimmesdale, and Roger Chillingworth, are rather difficult to classify as either good or bad; they are simply human. Hawthorne’s moral ambiguity amongst these characters makes them more relatable to real human beings and serves as a clear portrayal of the complex human psyche. One can not be defined as simply bad or good; humans are much more complex than these two binary words which is why Hawthorne’s realization of moral ambiguity is quite profound.

Acts of the Apostles chronicles the rapid advancement of the Gospel by way of the gift of the Holy Spirit. “The Holy Spirit in the Acts of the Apostles: The Charismatic Community in Mission” takes into account the narratives succeeding Pentecost including Spirit Baptisms from Samaria to Ephesus (Acts

Paul, a missionary, established many Christian communities as he traveled around. One church he founded in Galatia began to stray away from the Christian teachings that Paul left for them. Because of the people abandoning their beliefs, Paul writes letters to the church to set things straight. The letters he wrote to this church is now contained in the book of Galatians in the Bible.

Acts 2:42-47 is a direct model for the Christian Church today. These verses are a clear example of faith in action. The Holy Spirit’s effect on the early church and apostles brought teaching, fellowship, the breaking of bread and prayer into fruition. The real-life love shown shouts to the 21st century church’s need to refocus on these basic tenants. This passage is a summary of the life of the early church. The four contexts in which the modern-church can draw knowledge to incorporate these heart-felt actions are historical context, literary contexts, interpretation and application.

The cultural context plays a very significant role in Acts 17:22-31. The encounter at the Areopagus lays philosophies a plenty. An understanding of the historical thought gives forth the much needed insight to grasping Apostle Paul’s message at Mar’s Hill. In Acts 17:16-34, Apostle Paul gives a rich guide on evangelism for future evangelists and readers and in particular, Acts 17:22-31 is absolutely resourceful in art of engaging a culture.

In the book of acts provides thirteen example of supernatural guidance to mark the stages of Paul’s minister. In this paper it talks about four of these passages that deal with direction given by the Holy Spirit. In the first passage it was about the prophecy of Agubus (11:27-30) in which he predicts a coming famine. In the second passage it was given the spirit inauguration of Paul first ministry journey at Antioch (13:1-4). The third passage is the spirit’s prohibition to Paul to preach in Asia and in Bithynia; however directing his travel to Troas (16:6-7). The last passage that was discussed is the extended travel narrative in which the Spirit compels Paul to go to Jerusalem (20:22-24), then evidently desire not for him to go there (21:4).

The second specific insight I read was Paul makes it clear to the Galatians that the gospel of grace rules out the use of mere rules or some code of conducts as a means of self-justification. That the purpose of Galatians was to call the churches back to the true gospel that Paul had preached and from which some them had recently departed.

“And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place.”-Acts 2:1, the key is they were one in agreement and they were together in the same place. I believe the writer of Acts, Luke, is showing us a contrast from the early Christians and the leadership of the Jewish faith. Throughout the New Testament we see the sharp contrast between the Pharisees and the Sadducees. But in Acts Luke is showing us the shocking difference between the system of ‘religion” they came out of and this “one accord” they operated in. “A unique Greek word, used 10 of its 12 New Testament occurrences in the Book of Acts, helps us understand the uniqueness of the Christian community. Homothumadon is a compound of two words meaning to

Act 2, gave us a vivid description of how the new testament church began. After Peter preaches on the Pentecost day many were touched by what Peter said. Act 2 recorded that many who were present when Peter spoke had the urgency to receive the gospel so that their sins can be forgiven. Although many accused the disciples of being drunk the good news is that Peter was able to make it clear that they were not drunk rather they filled with the holy spirit. Fulfilling the prophecy that was given to the Jews by the prophets.

The second Part of a two-volume work related to the Gospel of Luke,1 called, “The Acts of the Apostles,” known as the most important book of the New Testament.2 Scholars overlooked the absolute purpose of Luke’s writings in Acts. Many lost focus of Luke’s apologic defense of the Christian movement concerning the Gospel of Jesus Christ that was addressed to the Jews. Instead, many evolving issues developed in the early church, as many Scholars dissected Luke’s purpose of his work. Whether the book is historically accurate, theological, or as the history book of the early church,3 it should be gleaned as Luke’s apologic plead to his unknown friend Theophilus, a senior Christian Roman official, or symbolically the entire

Paul decided to state on the Truth of the gospel. He gave everything to preaching the truth of who was and who is Jesus. Paul is a passionate man, and is quite prepared to be a part of the costly business of building God’s kingdom on earth, building Christian communities that will grow and flourish. However, when the Galatians have gone astray, they did not notice that their faith is compromised. After all that Paul has put into building, encouraging and nurturing their faith, they have started to dabble in things that are not holy. Paul’s anger is expressed in the language that he uses; it is not the language of marital betrayal, but of military desertion. Paul isn’t simply upset because he feels that he has been let down by his ‘children’,