Acts Of Deviance From Members Of Our Society

In downtown San Jose, there are many homeless people in the streets. Sometimes I find myself walking quickly past by hoping that they will not ask me a question. Some of these people could have led successful lives, and a misfortunate event may have caused them to live on the streets. We associate shaggy clothing and messy looks with homeless people. This false image creates the fear that we have yet to accept. This also increases the marginalization within our society. A thought Staples has is “to remain a shadow—timid, but a survivor” (167). For all we know, these people are minding their own business, and we insert ourselves into thinking that they may want something from us when they just want to get by in life. They remain on the sidelines when they know that other people do not accept them because they could be charged or arrested as a criminal for bothering someone else, since it is easy to be susceptible if one is a person of color. Thus, it could lead to false accusations and contribute to mass

Deviance is described as any violation to the norms present in a culture. Since these norms are culture specific, deviance is viewed as a relative concept. Chapter 8 in the textbook introduces us to deviance by showing the reaction of Napoleon Chagnon to seeing the Yanomamo Indians of Brazil, in what they would view as regular attire. These Indigenous people glared at Chagnon and his group, while being nude and having drug colored mucus running from their noses. They were covered in filth and would clean their hands by spitting tobacco filled saliva in them. This is disturbed Chagnon greatly, due to it deviating so greatly from the customary norms he is familiar with. Norms pertaining to greeting other, dress, and hygiene. To these Natives, their behavior was completely normal, while to foreigners, it deviated from the subjective norms they embody.

Labeling theory holds that individuals come to identify and act as per their labels. The major tenet of this theory is that the behavior and self-identity of individuals is affected by the way they are described by other people (Vold, Bernard, Snipes, & Gerould, 2016). According to this theory, the act of deviance is not implicit in a particular act, but is hedged on the inclination of the majority to ascribe labels to minorities in society who deviate from standard behavior. Labeling leads to dramatization of a particular act – which propagates the behavioral clash between the individual and the community. Through ascribing labels, the individuals acquire a negative self-image. The individuals accept themselves as labeled by the

Deviance is an act that goes against the social norms such as rules or expectations. It can be something small such as running through the stop signs or it can be something big such as hijacking an airplane. Deciding if the act is deviant or not depends on the context (society, environment, etc.). According to Howard S. Becker, it is not the act itself, but the reactions to the act that, makes something deviant. Deviance is not a word that is used for judging people, but it is used to refer to an act to which people respond negatively. Norms vary among different cultural groups, therefore, one deviant act in one group might not be deviant to another. For example, it will be considered deviant or going against the norm if someone decided to

Whether we choose to admit it or remain completely oblivious, our world is composed of social norms that govern our everyday actions. Everything from brushing our teeth to wearing appropriate clothing in public is predetermined and dictated by society. Violation of these established rules inevitably earn an individual a label of “weird,” “abnormal” or “deviant.” The concept of deviance as been debunked by a plethora of scholars—many of whom have adopted an anthropological perspective on the issue. Collectively, their theories and arguments portray the intricacy of the deviant phenomenon and its embedment within

A label defines an individual as a certain kind of person. Defining an act as deviant or criminal is not a simple straight forward process. A label is not neutral, it contains an evaluation of the person to whom it is applied. It is a ‘Master Status’ in the sense that it overshadows all the other statuses possessed by the individual. If an individual is labelled as criminal, mentally ill or gay, such labels tend to override the individuals status as father, husband, worker, friend or neighbour. Whether or not the label is applied will depend on how the act is interpreted by the audience. This in turn will depend on who commits the act and where and when it was committed.

Associating with the self-fulfilling prophecy, master status, and symbolic interactionism, Howard Becker’s labeling theory, views deviance as not an innate act, but rather, elects to target society impulse to engage in stigmatization (Cartwright, 2011). In this paper, I will discuss the implications of labeling specifically in the articles “The Saints and the Roughnecks” by William Chambliss and “On Being Sane In Insane Places” by David Rosenhan. Additionally, I will be discussing the far-reaching effects of negative labeling an individual, with respect to concepts such as labeling theory, the self-fulfilling prophecy, and master status.

Deviance can be defined as an absence of conformity to the social norm. Not all deviant behavior is necessarily illegal or harmful to individuals, these behaviors can range from standing in another’s personal space to murdering another individual. In some cases, it can be looked upon as a positive change or a unique and favorable act. Although, considered deviant because it is not the social norm, it still can have a very positive social aspect or lead to social change. Culture and the societies within these cultures have a significant impact on what is considered deviant and what is acceptable or even lawful behavior. The degree of deviance is measured by society’s reaction towards the action and the lawful sanctions that may take

Within any culture lies an array of definitive demeanors and actions that are deemed socially adequate and inadequate. Depending on the distinguishing behavior of a given individual and the society that they live in, there are invisible “laws” that prevent people from acting a certain way. If the individual’s behavior is adverse to the superior, predominant norms of their society, the actions of that individual are considered to be deviant. Social deviance in shown in a variety of dissimilar faces: within physical appearance, actions done to oneself and others, and religious groups.

In the 1998 film American History X, Derek Vineyard is paroled after serving 3 years in prison for brutally murdering two black men who were breaking into his truck. Through his Brother Danny’s narration of a paper he is writing, it is learned that Derek was the leader of a large Neo-Nazi group known as D.O.C., or Disciples of Christ, that committed many acts of racial crime throughout Los Angeles. During his time in prison Derek decides that hate is a waste of time after being violently raped by fellow white supremacists, and his only friend being a black man, who was only in prison for a misunderstanding. After getting out on parole, Derek learns that Danny is headed down the same racist path as him, and decided that he must put a stop to it. Throughout this film there are many examples of the five theories of deviance; Functional, Conflict, Labeling, Broken Windows, and Differential Association. From Derek’s initial exposure to racism, all the way to him deciding to change, all five theories are exemplified through Derek, Danny, their Father, Cameron, or the D.O.C. as a whole.

Society labels him with stereotypes, such as “other” and “deviant,” often refusing to serve or to be in close proximity to this homeless person (Wright 7). Such treatment destroys a person’s dignity and self-respect. SOME is a unique organization, for it not only provides the needy with food, clothing, and shelter, but the volunteer group also offers medical, dental, personal hygiene, and counseling services (Foundation). With this type of attention, the homeless can escape the negative labels that society forces on them because they do not appear to be homeless. By offering these special personal services, SOME instills a sense of personal dignity in a homeless person.

This is true according to differential association theory. It is because of symbolic interactionism. People majorly assume that deviance is learned like other social behaviors (Page 121). Some subcultures hold values that favor deviance learned through socialization (Page 121). The groups that have more deviance characteristics than others are because of the delinquent gangs around (Page 121). The people live with deviant subcultures and neighborhoods (Page 121).

Social deviance is a violation of social norms. So what qualifies as a social deviant? According to sociologist, Howard S. Becker the best definition of social deviance is, “It is not the act itself, but the reactions to the act, that do something deviant.” In cultures around the world, there are many practices Americans find deviant, but in other cultures, it’s the norm. In many countries around the world, girls are married as young as 11 years old. To Americans, that is considered child abuse and rape, but that is only because of our social norms. To the men and parents in different countries, it is perfectly normal because their social norms. In America, social deviance comes in many different forms. We have our sexual deviants,

Labeling theorists suggest that labeling individuals as deviant has the potential of becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy (Globokar, 2008). Howard Becker has described deviance as a “consequence of the application by others of rules and sanctions to an ‘offender’; the deviant is one to whom the label has successfully been applied; deviant behavior is behavior people so label” (Clinard & Meier, 2011:89). Culture, sex, age and other elements of identity all shape self-conception, but the meanings that an individual places on various circumstances and interactions certainly play a very important role as well.

Mala in se or mala prohibita are crimes that go against one 's morals and value system. These are criminal activities, which do not comply with the mandates of the land. However, these crimes or crimes can distort or clouds one 's judgments in regards to these regulations/ policies. These criminal offenses are actions in which the standards of society are stretched to the limit. The crime was various with the population demographic of the region where the actual crime was committed. These are brutal crimes that are view as illegal, which possess a threat, risk, and harm to one’s individual self or others. Offenses such as these are often banned or may even be considered as global mandates. Consequently, these terms often share common regulations along with strategies, which may be supported by their standards. The standards often entail particular specification which upheld these statutes or regulation in regards to these by-laws being that the courts have the final say in regards to these types of criminal activities. I think that an illegal drug dealer, prostitution, and a gambling fit are each simple crimes but goes against most morals and values; therefore, these crimes would be considered to be just wrong. For example, with the drug dealer if he/she decides to sell these drugs to others then this puts the consumer in harm’s way. Sometimes this individual can be viewed as a potential risk or threat to himself as well. In examining the prostitution arena, I think this