preview

Ad Hominem Fallacies In The Crucible

Decent Essays
Open Document

In Act Three of the play The Crucible, written by Arthur Miller, a Salem trial is presented of the people who are involved in witchcraft. Throughout the trial, almost everyone uses a countless number of fallacious statements that make the trial go chaos. Including Danforth, who is the governor of the case, was unable to stop the hysteria by failing to inspect evidence seriously and to act excessively. Danforth’s ignorance and unreasonable actions show that he is an irresponsible judge and that he messed up the witchcraft case. Danforth makes several appeals to false authority that makes him have the skill to deal with witchcraft and religion. In response to Francis’ comment about the girls being “fraud”, Danforth argues that “near to four …show more content…

First, Parris uses an ad hominem fallacy to appeal to Danforth that Proctor is guilty of witchcraft because he does not “come to church but once in a month” (90). Parris harms Proctor’s reputation by attempting to bring up Proctor’s religion. What’s wrong with Parris’ logic is that he does not provide an argument to Proctor’s reasoning. Parris’ ad hominem fallacious statement led to Danforth question Proctor of his knowledge of “the Gospel” ( Parris and Danforth use ad hominem fallacies by pointing out Proctor’s religion which had nothing to with the …show more content…

While Mary Warren was telling the truth to Danforth, Abigail points out fallacious statements that have an impact on Mary Warren’s testimony and thus leaving Danforth mishandling the trial. Abigail uses multiple numbers of red herrings to distract everyone from Mary Warren’s testimony. While Danforth was listening to Mary Warren’s testimony, Abigail uses red herring by pointing out “the wind” (109), showing that there is the presence of the spirits. What´s wrong with this scene is that Danforth is allowing Abigail to make multiple red herrings that have a negative impact on Mary Warren’s testimony. Abigail’s irrelevant statements caused Danforth to see Mary Warren’s testimony in a negative way and therefore suspecting her of witchcraft. After Proctor admits that he had an affair with Abigail, he tells Danforth that his wife, Elizabeth, is unable to lie. Elizabeth comes in, not knowing that Proctor told the truth about the affair, lies to Danforth that she did not know about it. Danforth uses a false dichotomy fallacy pointing out that Elizabeth “spoke nothing of lechery, and [Proctor] has lied” (114). What Danforth does not see as a third option is the reasoning behind Elizabeth’s lie, which was to protect Proctor’s

Get Access