Adam Smith And Karl Marx 's Views On The Deregulation Of University Fees

Adam Smith was born on June 16th, 1723, in Kirkcaldy, Scotland. He was a professor at the University of Glasgow. At the time, people believed

Smith advocated for free trade for a country. A country should export more than it imports. This stimulates the growth of the economy. Adam Smith was an optimist who sought the best for his country.

Over time, this powerful theoretical proposition has become a legitimating cornerstone for the robust defense of market capitalism, a particular ensemble of political institutions, and a specific line of justification for liberal ideas and values. Though manifestly plausible as an accurate reading of Smith when Wealth of Nations is read on its own, even on these terms, this interpretation, is limited and partial. Astonishingly, and disappointingly, most readers of Wealth of Nations fail to attend the very next sentence that follows Smith's seemingly transhistorical, objectivist theory of human dispositions, mindful of Mandeville's classical representation of human egoism. Smith immediately probed more deeply by asking "Whether this propensity be one of those original principles in human nature of which no further account can be given; or whether, as

Called the Father of Modern Economics, Adam Smith was an enormous advocate for private markets. He supported an economic system based on the decision making by individuals instead of the government. Smith felt that no one person or a group is fit to make decisions for a whole population of people and that the population knows how to make decisions for its welfare. In Smith’s mind, people work to supplement their own lives, and when people seek individual economic gain then they unexpectedly promote society and stimulate the economy subconsciously. If people earn more money by working harder then almost all people will work harder. Smith insinuates that people are naturally self preserving and by default selfish; but to a point. Everyone has something that they want and in this world most things can be obtained if a person has enough money. Smith believes that every man should be free to

Smith believed that self, self-interest, and self-determination, all were mechanisms where individuals are motivated to gain wealth and power for individual gain and group gain. Smith believed that ‘self' is a matrix of reason and passion (Levine, 1998). Furthermore, Smith believed that sympathy leads to empathy, and our individual self-determination leads to accumulation of wealth that benefits others as well as us (Levine, 1998). Examples of this concept are evident in our current economic society today. We see Bill Gates and Microsoft providing technology to communicate more efficiently, Henry Ford's posterity changing the transportation market, and many others who impact man with their accumulation of wealth.

On the other hand, Smith believes that at the state of nature, man actually tends towards harmonious relationships of bartering and are willing to work together instead of apart. He utilizes individual power to give him leverage in transactions. His creation of social order is not to control this tendency, but rather to create a system in which it can flourish, which he calls the division of labor. In this, each man finds his place in the social order, produces something in particular, and a lot of the transaction costs from bartering are worked past. Unlike Hobbes, he believes that social order simply adds to the ability of man’s power towards transaction.

It is said Smith’s mother led him to his scholarly efforts. By 1740, Smith had developed a passion for freedom in that personal freedom and liberty will lead to the best possible outcome. Because of this, Smith is often regarded as an essential proponent in laissez-faire. By 1748, Smith was teaching and giving lectures at Edinburgh. It was here that Smith first established his economic thoughts about freedom and liberty. By his late 20’s, Smith had already developed the passion for liberty, reason, and free speech.

Smith, however, was of the opinion that Mercantile System was deeply flawed. Firstly, as given in the Fourth Book (3) of the Wealth of Nations, he argued that the real wealth of a nation was “not in the unconsumable riches of money, but in the consumable goods annually reproduced by the labour of the society”. (4) Secondly, the balance of trade, as observed by him, often did little to enhance the wealth of a nation and instead served to create violent national animosity instead. He instead put forth the idea of a balance of annual production and consumption, which if it were unfavourable would have caused a decay of the wealth of a nation. Thirdly, Prof. Smith was a strong critic of the idea of colonialism; stating that, “To found a great empire for the sole purpose of raising up a people of customers, may at first sight, appear a project fit only for a nation of shopkeepers. It is, however, a project altogether unfit for a nation of shopkeepers, but extremely fit for a nation whose government is influenced by shopkeepers. Such statesmen, and such statesmen only, are capable of fancying that they will find some advantage in employing the blood and treasure of their fellow-citizens, to found and maintain such an empire.”(5) The implication being that the idea of colonialism was of an extremely oppressive nature, beneficial only to the colonial

One of the things I did understand though is his idea that the key cause of the wealth of nations is the division of labor and in order to gain wealth or become wealthy, you must be productive. Being wealthy is not about the money. According to Adam Smith, money is the universal commodity which means that it is a universal, useful or valuable thing. Smith uses the example of a pin-factory to show the benefits of the division of labor. Each worker can specialize their own trade to make the making of a pin much faster. Smith gave the example of how to make a pin by giving worker number one the task of drawing out the wire, worker two straightens it, worker three cuts it, worker four points it and worker five makes the head. Dividing the labor up among multiple individuals allows production to constantly flow instead of having one man do all five of those jobs even though he is not specialized in those five tasks. I also agree with this idea of dividing up labor to increase production. If you have one man doing multiple jobs but he is only trained in one of those jobs, production will be much slower than when you hire multiple workers to do their own specialization. He also uses the invisible hand example. The invisible hand is an invisible or hidden “force” that gets people to use their own interests, without their knowledge, to profit society. As these people compete with each other by

Can greed and self-interest benefit our society’s economy? majority of people would say, but one man by the name of Adam Smith would’ve disagreed. he believed that profit motive even greed could be good for the economy. This very theory spiraled an onset of controversies and debates. However, his theory shined in the right light; justified is the best solution for the economy.

If a man had no hope of property, Smith thought, he would obviously work badly. He based his beliefs from experience of all ages and nations. "Work done by freemen comes cheaper in the end than that performed by slaves." That sentence was immensely influential in the slave labor plantation system. Smith's interpretation was taken exceptionally serious because unlike most who were opposes to slavery based on factors such as religion and moral belief, Smith never mention moral or religion regarding slavery as a factor in his book "Wealth of Nations".

Since the early days of the United States, the Founding Fathers and other brilliant minds sought ways to understand and make sense of the inner workings of society and the economic market. Out of the many thinkers and developers of that time period, perhaps none made so great an impact on American society as the Scottish contemporary philosopher and political economist, Adam Smith—who is most known for his influential work, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, By the early nineteenth century, other streams of economic theory emerged from various individuals who were also influenced by the ideas of Smith. Some of these individuals included David Ricardo, Karl Marx and later John Maynard Keynes and Milton Friedman—each of whom contributed their own ideas on economic activity. However, it was Smith’s ideas on capitalism and his laissez-faire approach to free markets that have transcended other economic theories and continue to impact American economic thought to this day.

An important aspect of Smith's views, were taxes. In one of Smith's many opinions regarding human nature, he explains that the rich, once placed in a position of power, maintain that power through their dealings within a civil government which employs men of inferior wealth, to protect the wealthy lands of the rich. In layman’s terms a community with the bare minimum has little violence since there is nothing to fight over, but one with plush property and wealth, has a plethora of people fighting over one another. This is where Smith's views of taxes comes into play. In his world, the government would impose taxation, with the intentions of discouraging improper or luxurious behavior which he believed did not benefit society as a whole. (Smith, pp.18-20) When discussing human nature in the sociological spectrum, Smith likens humans to animals, or dogs in particular. The typical reliance of animals, once they're matured,on no one but themselves (becoming independents), is a characteristic that humans do not follow. I believe Smith's

His study of the renowned "rich country" has taken the spirit of industrial capitalism and presented its proven logic in the form of ruling the mindset of the most influential political economists of the nineteenth century. His first "theory of Moral sentiment" was written and published in London in the eighteenth century. The main point of view of his writings was that gold and silver were wealth and there were countries resisting exports and imports to maximize this metal wealth. Smith's insight was that the wealth of the country is really the flow of goods and services that it produces. Rich nations are leaving a powerful solution to the worst economic problems the world can throw at

Smith’s first book the Theory of Moral Sentiments was published just five years before he began writing his second, the Wealth of Nations – which