Adidas S.W.O.T Analysis

The highly recognized name brand—Nike— fails to notice the faults that are happening in factories that are violating a few disturbing rules. The company’s reputation has decreased due to demands and claims Nike; implying that they utilize sweatshops to produce more products at a lower pay. The company has been sued numerous times for abusing and exploiting their employees in factories for years. Another problem that Nike has faced throughout the years was making employees work in poor environments that affected the health of many— which contributed to being abused by the manager for not going to work. Nike distributes and sells merchandise of high quality for a high value. The company is giving the satisfaction of quality service to their

Internationally recognized companies such as Nike make use of sweatshops and aid in the exploitation of labor workers in many parts of the world. A sweatshop is an industrialized provision that is known to have poor working conditions, infringement of labor law, and long hours coupled with low wages. In today’s world, sweatshops are prevalent all across the globe; however they raise the most concern in developing nations. Nike is one of the world’s most renowned sportswear companies, but has been involved in several controversies in relation to the possibility of them making profit out of sweatshop labor. In the late 1900’s most Nike products were manufactured in countries like South Korea and Taiwan, however, this changed when the labor

In the following essay, I will write about Adidas Company and will describe the relationship among its various quality costs which are failure costs, internal failure costs, external failure costs, appraisal costs and prevention costs. In addition, I will analyze the efforts the company should focus on to further improve the quality of its products/services. Therefore, this essay is divided to 3 main points which I think the company should focus to improve its quality. The first point is the prevention cost which’s the most important quality cost that

Consumer demand risks for this group occur because as product demands change, it takes the company on average 12 to 18 months to obtain new products. If consumer demand changes too quickly, this can result in revenue loss. Over a period of time, if the consumer demands are not met in a timely fashion, this can be detrimental and critical to Adidas Group. Industry consolidations risks result in decreased bargaining power and price wars. It could also lead to inflated discounts on Adidas products as well as limited space within the retailers. This risk comes from market consolidation and strategic alliances. Political and regulatory risks- trade policies in particular, stem from restrictions on importing, tariffs, and other factors that could influencing or disrupt the free flow of goods within the company and other vendors. There are several sources that legal risks could come from. The main legal risks that the Adidas Group is faced with are patents and third-party trademark infringement. With so many competitors in the same industry, they must be careful not to raise concern for risk. Risks from product counterfeiting and imitation come from brand and design theft. Social and environmental risks for Adidas Group refer to the company’s responsibilities to their employees, vendors and the environment in which they provide.

Nike has been blamed for using sweatshop labor in the production of its soccer balls and footwear, the company used sweatshop labor to keep their spending costs as low as possible.while Nike earns millions of dollars, some of its employees are forced to work in poor labor conditions to support their families.

Adidas is a sportswear manufacturing company started by Adolf Dassler. Adidas group has incorporated brands including Adidas, Reebok, TaylorMade-Adidas and Rockport. The wings of the company are widespread and have assimiliated other productions including handbags, shirts, spectacles, watches, balls, and sportswear. Adidas is being the largest company that sells footwear in the European market and have achieved a momentous market share at the global platform. Adidas has achieved phenomenal sale and have reached the pinnacle of success on the global scale with other international footwear companies (McDonald & Milne, 1999).

As the article mentions, customers didn’t have productions so much. As a result of this, net income decreased 38% and sales increased only 2% from last year. Costumers are important core of the company, but Adidas couldn’t attract them. Moreover, there were anti-Adidas people who were fans of “The U”. They definitely don’t buy the productions, and their chatter on social media would affect to decrease customers. Although the article doesn’t describe exactly, turmoil in Russia would also influence Adidas. By declining the oil price, many investors were influenced. If Adidas invested oil company in Russia, Adidas would be caused a loss. If other American company invested the oil company, they were also caused a loss, and American economy influenced badly. People who invested the oil company reduced to buy production and saved money because of their

Our team has reviewed and compiled an assortment of financial statements and documents pertaining to the firm’s progress and financial position in comparison to its direct competitor, Nike. Through our financial analysis, we have identified potential areas of strength and weakness for Under Armour and Nike, which we plan to address and call to the attention of Under Armour’s management team.

Apparel and shoe manufacturers continued to offload the more costly yet easily replicated part so their business models to concentrate on brand building, marketing, sales and attaining greater distribution channels globally. These are the pressures all apparel and shoe manufacturers face, and it is particularly challenging in the athletic show industry (Kynge, 2009). Adidas, Converse, Nike and Reebok have been outsourcing production of their shoes for in some cases nearly three decades. Nike was one of the leaders in this strategy, seeing to create a more efficient supply chain and also drop the labor and union costs of manufacturing in the U.S. (Boje, Khan, 2009). Adidas, Converse and Reebok have all followed Nike's lead, with Adidas benefitting from the fall-out generated when investigate reports showed Nike using child labor throughout Pakistan and Vietnam (Boje, Khan, 2009). All four of these companies share a common prioritization of manufacturing operations, yet none of them with the exception of Nike has a comprehensive Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) program in place to ensure ethical compliance to global standards of outsourcing in their industry (Nike Investor Relations, 2012). The intent of this analysis is to compare and contrast the four companies mentioned and their outsourcing practices. Their reasons for choosing to outsource are very much the same; the industry is shrinking

Another perspective is to analyse based on the amount of good done as compared to the amount of bad. By subcontracting its operations in underdeveloped countries, Nike helps to create job and improve the lives of the employed. Then, we have to consider the poor working conditions, poor wages, and the constant violation of child labour laws. Now, the bad inevitably outweighs the good despite the lack of unit of measurement in the

Nike’s CEO’s and management made a decision to begin using sweatshop labor in order to save money and begin aggressive marketing. They used this aggressive marketing to have a one up on their competitors, in fact, Nike spent 280 million dollars alone on advertising in 1994 (Schwartz, 2000). Nike would give great athletes million dollar contracts to endorse and wear their clothing. For an example, Andre Agassi received 70 million dollars to endorse Nike's tennis clothing line. The choice to start aggressive marketing is the reason why Nike entered into this crisis and started making unethical decisions. Once the top management of Nike realized the profitability and popularity of hiring professional athletes to wear and endorse their clothes, regular advertising would not suffice. The company became greedy and were willing to use cheap abusive labor so that they could pay professional athletes millions of dollars (Schwartz, 2000).

1. What is adidas’ position in the athletic shoe market? How does the brand seem to be doing in this market? Position: the position of adidas has transferred from “leading supplier of soccer footwear worldwide” to “leading sport brand”. Adidas was founded in Germany in 1920. In 1995, it became a public company as well as the leading supplier of soccer footwear due to its great performance of footwear sales. In 1998, adidas began to move into the U.S. market. Adidas doubled its U.S. market share within only one year, so it hoped to continue to make big move in following years. In its way to U.S. market, adidas confront with the

On a like-for-like basis, Reebok segment sales declined by 5% in 2007. At TaylorMade-Adidas Golf, currency-neutral revenues increased 1%, negatively impacted by the divestiture of the Greg Norman Collection wholesale business. On a like-for-like basis, TaylorMade-Adidas Golf sales increased 9%. Sales in the HQ/Consolidation segment decreased by 60% on a currency-neutral basis, mainly due to the expiration of the Salomon footwear sourcing cooperation agreement. Currency translation effects negatively impacted sales in all segments in euro terms. Adidas sales increased 7% to € 7.113 billion in 2007 from € 6.626 billion in 2006. Sales at Reebok decreased 6% to € 2.333 billion versus € 2.473 billion in the prior year. TaylorMade-Adidas Golf sales declined 6% to € 804 million in 2007 from € 856 million in 2006. HQ/Consolidation sales decreased 62% to € 48 million from € 129 million in the prior year. (Adidas-group factsheet 2007).The merger and acquisition has gone beyond expectation. Although there were reports of declining sales of Reebok in the North America in the early years of its acquisition but this was due to the currency-neutral sales in the Reebok which is now associated to the turnover. But in later years, beginning 2010 despite the economic turmoil in US and Europe the Adidas Group together with other subsidiary products continues to boost its sales.Such increases are

Adidas is a major German sports apparel manufacturer, which was founded in 1948. It is the largest sportswear manufacturer in Europe and the second biggest sportswear manufacturer in the world, after Nike. The company's clothing and shoe designs typically feature three parallel bars. The company revenue for 2009 was listed at €10.38 billion. The market segmentation; targeting and position play an important role in this company. This essay will use the three factors to analyze this company.

Adidas is the second largest sportswear and apparels manufacturer (Dogiamis & Vijayashanker, 2009). By far, Adidas holds a market share of 22% (Dogiamis & Vijayashanker, 2009). Adidas had also registered the infamous ‘3 stripes’ as its trademark (Berntson, Jarnemo & Philipson, 2006). The founders of Adidas, Adolf and Rudolf Dassler had the vision of providing athletes with the best suited pair of shoes for their respective sports (Dogiamis & Vijayashanker, 2009). In efforts of achieving that, Adidas is had used the strategy of collaborating with important athletes to gain their insights on the products offered (Berntson, Jarnemo & Philipson, 2006). This contributes to the fact that Adidas had earned