Advanced Directives: A Case Study

The increased use of advanced directives, such as do-not-resuscitate orders, has made discussions on end-of-life care much easier for patients and professionals alike.

A patient barrier might include having limited knowledge surrounding life-support systems and treatment options, thereby hindering their ability to fully comprehend or demand certain interventions. Good counseling is therefore essential to overcoming this barrier in implementing the patient’s true and best wishes (Kroning, 2014, p. 222). Another barrier in implementing advance directives concerns the role and influence of family members and the patient. There may be discordance between the desires of the patient and family, which can result in serious debate and tension if not addressed and taken into consideration. Physicians still may have reservations, as certain demands made by the patient may raise ethical concerns in the future, if the provider feels the interventions being done are no longer medically appropriate.

An Advance directive is a living will, which allows one to document their wishes concerning medical treatments at the end of life. Even though it’s optional, but all health care facilities are required by law to ask patients if they have one, and offer them the appropriate information, and documents to sign if they want it. There are two basic kinds of advance directives, living wills, and

In addition to advance directives, there are other decisions involving end of life care that people should think about and discuss with their loved ones. These are decisions are around the ‘how’ and ‘where’ that people wish to die. These types of measures may be touched on in one’s advance directives, but may not go into great detail. If diagnosed with a terminal disease or if the end of life is imminent, one should decide on the type and amount of treatment they receive. With death as a certainty, most people turn toward either palliative care or hospice

This scenario presents various ethical issues that could be argued several ways from HIPPA violations to whether or not this patient has/had the cognitive ability to understand the execution of an advanced directive and Power of Attorney. Advance Directives are put in place for this very reason. It eliminates the need for family members to make a choice in the heat of the moment and also respects the wishes of the person whom it affects directly. Although Mr. E’s hypoxia could affect his ability to think clearly one cannot assume that he has an altered level of consciousness nor the inability to execute an advance

When you are able, you should put thought into the physical process you will go through. All of us love you and want to make sure that when the time comes, we know and can follow your wishes regarding the care you wish to receive. Having your decisions thoroughly and clearly stated in an advance directive will make this possible. (Berger, 2014, p. 590). Your advance directive document may contain a living will, a signed consent for Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), and information identifying your healthcare proxy. Understanding these things now, will help you make clear choices. A living will clarifies what care, or lack of care, you wish to have (Berger, 2014, p. 590). This is helpful for reference if you are ever unconscious or in any way incapable

Advanced care directives are legal documents provided to physicians and health care workers with an outline containing preferences for the treatment at end of life. Patients often do not discuss their wishes regarding end-of-life care with family members or health care providers prior to the event of a serious illness or traumatic event. Educational interventions focus on raising awareness and providing patients with information on advance care planning.

There are two types of advance directives: a Living Will and the Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care. A Living Will requires a witness or be notarized and consists of a directive that instruct the acting physicians to not utilize medical interventions in an instance that the patient is unable to make their immediate medical decision. The Living Will is the oldest form of advanced directives, requires a patient be terminally ill and it states that its interpretation is only to be assumed by the patient and their physician, there is never to be any family influence or interpretation of a Living Will. Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care is also witnessed or notarized and identifies an ‘agent’ to make health care decisions if the signer is unable to make their own decision. An agent is an individual that the patient chooses with great care, due to the amount of power/authority that is assumed to making such decisions. The Durable Power of Attorney does not require that a patient be terminally ill and is interpreted by the identified ‘agent’. There have also been known to be hybrid documents that combine elements of a Living Will and Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care that acts as an Advanced Directive. (Advanced Directives.,

The Advance Directives form is somewhat different but its purpose is the same: to let an individual make end of life decisions. It is a longer form, with more involved questions.

Patient self- Determination Act (PSDA) encourages people to make a decision about the extent of medical care they want to accept or refuse (American Cancer Society, 2015). It is the responsibility of ethics committee to make patients aware of their rights. Also, “committee members need to be educational and advisory in nature, they should educate themselves, other health care workers, patients and the family members regarding the ethical principles and organization’s policy relating to the ethical issues”(Alexander & Kavaler, 2014). Many people are not aware with the advance directives, they don’t know how to complete advance directives (ADs), what are the state regulation to complete ADs and only a few people discuss their preferences with doctor, which do not protect their autonomy during the time of end- of- life (House & Lach, 2014). Health care professionals must be competent to provide information on ADs so that patients will be able to make a decision. In addition, patient’s wishes and ADs need to be discussed among family members and the health care providers so ethics committee plays an integral role in protecting patients’ preferences and supporting ADs process for

Every person except one did not know what an advanced directive states. The only interview that knew what I was asking was because they had just lost a loved one and their family was going through the situation. There were five children in the family. They had two children as execrator of the will and one child as a healthcare power of attorney. Before the death, the client states to have a full code with no artificial nutrient or ventilation. They only sought out partial interventions which made their status a code C. During this time the patient coded, and the wishes the client states stood strong. Therefore, it is so important to have an advance directive on file or with the next of kin. You never know when this time will happen but you can be proactive, and be prepared for any situation to

“It is estimated that 75 percent of Americans have never taken the time to discuss their wishes or provided any written guidance to loved ones or health care providers in the event the patient is unable to speak for themselves” (Kottkamp, 2013). This is why patients should decide on having an advanced directive. Advanced directives exits to “encourage and empower patients to be ready for the unexpected, to provide the gift of guidance to their loved ones, and, ultimately, to be sure that patients get the care they want and need if they are ever unable to speak for themselves” (Kottkamp, 2013). Advanced directives are recognized in all 50

This film explains the legal role of advance directives in end of life issues. An advance directive is “a written document directing how medical decisions are to be made in the future when the patient lacks decisional capacity and is unable to decide and choose” (Hanlon, End of Life Issues, Slide 28, Bullet 1). All three of the cases demonstrate the importance in filling out some form of directive. When there is nothing to go off of, it makes decisions extremely tough for families and medical providers. Having legal documentation of patient wishes helps understand what treatments they would or would not consent to. In cases like

Advance Directives are our wishes when we are at end of life stages of life that give specific direction of how, who, and when to treat us in our final days and hours. We can have documents drawn up to say what we want in the event we are in a state where we cannot voice our wishes aloud. These documents have legal and ethical basis, and they should be followed unless the legally or ethically unable to do so.

The case of Karen Ann Quinlan led to four basic approaches to this ethical problem; advance directives or other clear evidence of the patients wishes while competent, surrogate decision making (power of attorney), and action in the patients best interest. Each solution has deficiencies both in theory and practice, but there can be no debate that their application has changed the landscape of medical ethics.